BF004 wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2021 16:36

23 hours away!!!

What a shame.

Perhaps they can get changed on the plane and go straight from the aeroplane onto the field.

First of all, no matter who the Rams play, I'm never going to say they are going to lose...As far as this game is concerned, I have said this multiple times on the forum. The Packers have had a lollipop schedule all season long and out of 13 wins only two of those teams they beat ended the season w...

I know things change year to year, but that schedule looks brutal. Fortunately the Lions, Vikings and Bears have virtually the same schedule. The only two differences (at least until they announce game 17!) are that we get Washington while the others get one of the other deadbeats from that divisio...

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

04 Jan 2021 13:07

Oh man, those poor Jags fans. Shad needs to get his head out of his ass and step back. Unless his plan is to keep sucking and move the team?

London Jaguars?

With coaches it's Belichick = Lombardi. I can't accept that. Lombardi had 10 seasons as head coach, won 5 championships, never had a losing record. Belichick has had 26 seasons as head coach, won 6 championships, had 6 losing records. Put him in the conversation for second place, by all means; but ...

bobsacamano wrote: ↑

08 Dec 2020 13:38

2021 the year for the london game?

I'm buying a ticket right now. I'm not waiting till they go on sale, or even till the fixture is announced.

MVS reminds me a lot of James Jones early in his career. Just drives you nuts. I think "bonehead play of the season" goes to whoever decided to throw to him on 3rd and 4 in the first drive of the second half. It was crucial that we got a first down because the defence had just faced a 7 m...

MVS reminds me a lot of James Jones early in his career. Just drives you nuts. I think "bonehead play of the season" goes to whoever decided to throw to him on 3rd and 4 in the first drive of the second half. It was crucial that we got a first down because the defence had just faced a 7 m...

the offense did enough to win this game, our defense isn't able to get off the field, week after week we give up 3rd and long, 3rd and short, and we suck on 1str and 2nd down too. feel bad for Scantling, however it's the same with some of the other players, it's great that they usually play well, i...

We want the Saints to drop two games but not 3 games because a 12-4 Bucs winning the South is game over for us. I think we can beat the Bucs. Not if we play them like we played them last time, of course - but I got the impression then that they were really up for the game and we weren't. Our team t...

Packers shut out the Bucs in the Dec. 1985 Snow Bowl, 21-0 https://fs64sports.blogspot.com/2015/12/1985-packers-shut-out-buccaneers-in.html . I really was there that day too! One of my fonder memories of Tom Brady was being at Soldier Field watching the Patriots beat the Bears by 36-7. It wasn't as...

Cdragon wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2020 16:47

Need those 3 and outs baby!

Oh the pessimism. I'll take three-and-out if it's the best we can do, but I'm really hoping for one-and-interception.

Rodgers also missed MVS on like 2-3 throws. I saw Rodgers miss a receiver by a long way 3 times in the game, and all 3 were aimed for MVS. Which leads me to believe that MVS might have been in the wrong place. Or perhaps that he and Rodgers read the same defence and get entirely different answers.

I mean I think a general theme we are seeing is your team needs to have at least one elite component (defense, run game, or QB) to win it all. Is there a SB champion that exists where every component was just....meh? New York Giants x 2? Just a suggestion? I don't remember them being outstanding at...

I've never fully believed in the "time of possession" issue. Number of plays, yes. Teams with more plays tend to tire out the defence. But if one team gets down the field in 12 plays with runs and possession-type passes while the other gets down the field in 12 plays with longer passes int...

'Just not really feeling the strategy here, short-term or even long-. We'll see. Here's the strategy. The strategy is that if a GM thinks that a QB is potentially a really good starter and perhaps even Hall of Fame, the GM drafts him. Thompson did it with Rodgers, and it would be hard to say he was...

'Just not really feeling the strategy here, short-term or even long-. We'll see. Here's the strategy. The strategy is that if a GM thinks that a QB is potentially a really good starter and perhaps even Hall of Fame, the GM drafts him. Thompson did it with Rodgers, and it would be hard to say he was...

Yoop wrote: ↑

27 Apr 2020 09:14

Belechick passed up a HOF QB

In 2000, Belichik passed up a HOF QB 6 times. You must have been laughing that weekend.

The problem is that the conclusion you draw bears no relation to the three paragraphs before it. He's drafted Love because he wants to be the best and continue being the best even after Rodgers has gone. If he had wanted to be just good enough, he would have signed a first round draft pick who can ...

There is no defending this draft - egotistical rubbish from the front office. Rodgers has every right to demand a trade at this point. This is an organization trying to signal its power to the face of the franchise. Rodgers should give them what they want and demand a trade - there is nothing wrong...