Packers have 4 SBs. Though 2 came before it was called that.
Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2022
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14333
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Very True.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14333
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
1999, 2000, 2005, 2008, 2013, 2017, 2018
The seasons with 10 wins or less.
The seasons with 10 wins or less.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I've added tier lines
The NFL had made illegal contact fouls an emphasis this season, and I'm not a big fan.
Can lead to a lot of ticky-tacky calls in coverage, especially early in the season. And we know this will only benefit the O...
I hate it when a CB sneezes in a WRs direction and the receiver takes a swan dive and instantly start flailing their arms for a penalty... Or a WR runs straight into a CB and then acts all victim-like.
Also, illegal contact has very little to do with player safety.
Can lead to a lot of ticky-tacky calls in coverage, especially early in the season. And we know this will only benefit the O...
I hate it when a CB sneezes in a WRs direction and the receiver takes a swan dive and instantly start flailing their arms for a penalty... Or a WR runs straight into a CB and then acts all victim-like.
Also, illegal contact has very little to do with player safety.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Agreed. That's the sort of small thing that could totally change Rasul's game. He's a handsy defender, for sure.salmar80 wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 19:03The NFL had made illegal contact fouls an emphasis this season, and I'm not a big fan.
Can lead to a lot of ticky-tacky calls in coverage, especially early in the season. And we know this will only benefit the O...
I hate it when a CB sneezes in a WRs direction and the receiver takes a swan dive and instantly start flailing their arms for a penalty... Or a WR runs straight into a CB and then acts all victim-like.
Also, illegal contact has very little to do with player safety.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13814
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I think given we still have elite defenders back there, and less than ideal WR's, this probably helps us this year a lot. Our D will still be great, our WR's could use some assistance.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 20:56Agreed. That's the sort of small thing that could totally change Rasul's game. He's a handsy defender, for sure.salmar80 wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 19:03The NFL had made illegal contact fouls an emphasis this season, and I'm not a big fan.
Can lead to a lot of ticky-tacky calls in coverage, especially early in the season. And we know this will only benefit the O...
I hate it when a CB sneezes in a WRs direction and the receiver takes a swan dive and instantly start flailing their arms for a penalty... Or a WR runs straight into a CB and then acts all victim-like.
Also, illegal contact has very little to do with player safety.
A coach should be able to challenge two to four of these subjective type calls per game.salmar80 wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 19:03The NFL had made illegal contact fouls an emphasis this season, and I'm not a big fan.
Can lead to a lot of ticky-tacky calls in coverage, especially early in the season. And we know this will only benefit the O...
I hate it when a CB sneezes in a WRs direction and the receiver takes a swan dive and instantly start flailing their arms for a penalty... Or a WR runs straight into a CB and then acts all victim-like.
Also, illegal contact has very little to do with player safety.
That would make the games utterly unbearable to watch.wallyuwl wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 22:03A coach should be able to challenge two to four of these subjective type calls per game.salmar80 wrote: ↑08 Aug 2022 19:03The NFL had made illegal contact fouls an emphasis this season, and I'm not a big fan.
Can lead to a lot of ticky-tacky calls in coverage, especially early in the season. And we know this will only benefit the O...
I hate it when a CB sneezes in a WRs direction and the receiver takes a swan dive and instantly start flailing their arms for a penalty... Or a WR runs straight into a CB and then acts all victim-like.
Also, illegal contact has very little to do with player safety.
Every between-play conversation would revolve around an in-progress challenge, should have challenged, or too bad they used all their challenges.
Ugh, I really don't like the look of negotiating through the media like this.
Read More. Post Less.
Packer fans think where tight wallet honcho's, Margaret McCaskey has her first penny of baby sitting money she ever earned framed and hanging next to Papa Bear Daddy George's Picture in the study
the price for ILB's is on the rise, good ones change the complexion of a defense, as good as we where last year with Campbell, we will see even more improvement adding Quay next to him.
Jamaal Williams being a leader:
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5308
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Sean McVay on trading for Stafford:
“We can sit here and exist, and be OK winning nine to 11 games, and losing in the f—ing divisional round and feel like, 'Oh, everything's OK.' Or, we could let our motherf—ing nuts hang, and go trade for this f—ing quarterback, and give ourselves a chance to go win a f—ing world championship.”
And I’ve been saying this for a decade now. You can go out and make a move to win a championship or you can sit there are wallow in just being a good team.
Time after time we witness the Packers in on someone just for someone else to offer a little more. OBJ. Marshawn Lynch. Tony G. Randy Moss. Antonio Brown. It’s embarrassing. This org needs to stop saying they want to win but not do the things it takes to win.
Sean McVay just showed what it means to want to win.
“We can sit here and exist, and be OK winning nine to 11 games, and losing in the f—ing divisional round and feel like, 'Oh, everything's OK.' Or, we could let our motherf—ing nuts hang, and go trade for this f—ing quarterback, and give ourselves a chance to go win a f—ing world championship.”
And I’ve been saying this for a decade now. You can go out and make a move to win a championship or you can sit there are wallow in just being a good team.
Time after time we witness the Packers in on someone just for someone else to offer a little more. OBJ. Marshawn Lynch. Tony G. Randy Moss. Antonio Brown. It’s embarrassing. This org needs to stop saying they want to win but not do the things it takes to win.
Sean McVay just showed what it means to want to win.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
As did the Bucs before themlupedafiasco wrote: ↑10 Aug 2022 21:02Sean McVay on trading for Stafford:
“We can sit here and exist, and be OK winning nine to 11 games, and losing in the f—ing divisional round and feel like, 'Oh, everything's OK.' Or, we could let our motherf—ing nuts hang, and go trade for this f—ing quarterback, and give ourselves a chance to go win a f—ing world championship.”
And I’ve been saying this for a decade now. You can go out and make a move to win a championship or you can sit there are wallow in just being a good team.
Time after time we witness the Packers in on someone just for someone else to offer a little more. OBJ. Marshawn Lynch. Tony G. Randy Moss. Antonio Brown. It’s embarrassing. This org needs to stop saying they want to win but not do the things it takes to win.
Sean McVay just showed what it means to want to win.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
This is a false equivalency.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑10 Aug 2022 21:02Sean McVay on trading for Stafford:
“We can sit here and exist, and be OK winning nine to 11 games, and losing in the f—ing divisional round and feel like, 'Oh, everything's OK.' Or, we could let our motherf—ing nuts hang, and go trade for this f—ing quarterback, and give ourselves a chance to go win a f—ing world championship.”
And I’ve been saying this for a decade now. You can go out and make a move to win a championship or you can sit there are wallow in just being a good team.
Time after time we witness the Packers in on someone just for someone else to offer a little more. OBJ. Marshawn Lynch. Tony G. Randy Moss. Antonio Brown. It’s embarrassing. This org needs to stop saying they want to win but not do the things it takes to win.
Sean McVay just showed what it means to want to win.
The QB position means so much more than any other position. A team who has almost everything, but doesn't have the QB needs to find the QB. A team who has the QB in place can add "that one piece" all they want and it may or may not move the needle.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5308
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Both the Buccs and Rams felt they needed that one piece on offense, signed a FA WR, and both scored TDs in the Super Bowl to help their team win a SB.
Meanwhile Packers fans rationalize trading up for an awful QB.
Meanwhile Packers fans rationalize trading up for an awful QB.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9709
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Do you think it was the WR additions, or adding Stafford and Brady that put them over the top?lupedafiasco wrote: ↑10 Aug 2022 21:47Both the Buccs and Rams felt they needed that one piece on offense, signed a FA WR, and both scored TDs in the Super Bowl to help their team win a SB.
Meanwhile Packers fans rationalize trading up for an awful QB.
Come on now.
You made a post about going out to get the QB. DrJ followed up to add in the Bucs, who went and got Brady. The rest of their roster composition and roster-building strategy works sometimes and doesn't sometimes. Recency bias has everyone jumping back on that train, but you can't count on your fingers the number of times teams have gone all-in on name free agent additions and still failed.
It also took McVay until his 5th year to win the Super Bowl. Arians got it in his 7th year as a HC. Y'all are comparing the middle of some stories to the beginning of ours. It's like going into 2010 when Rodgers had played 2 years and "couldn't win the big one" because he was 0-1 in the playoffs. Gutey and MLF have somehow failed by not winning yet in years 3 and 4?
We'll talk if Rodgers retires without a second ring. That'll be disappointing--not tragic, but disappointing. Until then, y'all all are just going to cherry pick examples of when your way worked and imply that any other way is doomed. But there is no one way to do it.
The only thing that stands up to scrutiny is that when Hall of Fame QBs play on mid-level or rookie contracts, your SB odds skyrocket. Everything else is just different preferences that all have merit but are not universally successful
There were some, but not many that liked the Love pick (especially trading up).lupedafiasco wrote: ↑10 Aug 2022 21:47Both the Buccs and Rams felt they needed that one piece on offense, signed a FA WR, and both scored TDs in the Super Bowl to help their team win a SB.
Meanwhile Packers fans rationalize trading up for an awful QB.