Packer 2022 Defense Thoughts

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Post Reply
User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Labrev wrote:
17 Aug 2022 16:46
lupedafiasco wrote:
17 Aug 2022 14:52
NCF wrote:
17 Aug 2022 14:04


I do think you are on to something that the defense needed this. I remember back a few years and this was one of the most lifeless units in the NFL. Just everyone standing there with their hands on their hips after every play. Jaire, Z, and Preston really started to reinvigorate the swagger and now it seems like it's contagious throughout the entire unit.
When I was a young stud phenom I talked massive amounts of &%$@. Football, basketball, beer pong, chess, whatever. Football I played corner and every time I lined up across from a receiver I asked him if his daddy knows hes playing with the big boys because his momma found out last night. I still play basketball every weekend even though I'm trash but whoever I'm guarding I'm in their ear the entire time about how sorry they are. When I was a young chess player I used to go to tournaments and snatch peoples pieces and ask them in the most disrespectful tone "What is this Christmas?" I would take their queens and hold it up over my head and act like I licked the bottom and told them I just took their bitch.

Gotta get in peoples heads. I would say 90% of people get too emotional and cant rise to the occasion to prove someone wrong in the moment. Bunch of bums. Me, I got ice water in the veins.

Dude wtf, you talked trash IN CHESS?? 😂
I found this old video of Lupe from league pong.

Image

Image

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

BF004 wrote:
19 Aug 2022 11:44
Labrev wrote:
17 Aug 2022 16:46
lupedafiasco wrote:
17 Aug 2022 14:52


When I was a young stud phenom I talked massive amounts of &%$@. Football, basketball, beer pong, chess, whatever. Football I played corner and every time I lined up across from a receiver I asked him if his daddy knows hes playing with the big boys because his momma found out last night. I still play basketball every weekend even though I'm trash but whoever I'm guarding I'm in their ear the entire time about how sorry they are. When I was a young chess player I used to go to tournaments and snatch peoples pieces and ask them in the most disrespectful tone "What is this Christmas?" I would take their queens and hold it up over my head and act like I licked the bottom and told them I just took their bitch.

Gotta get in peoples heads. I would say 90% of people get too emotional and cant rise to the occasion to prove someone wrong in the moment. Bunch of bums. Me, I got ice water in the veins.

Dude wtf, you talked trash IN CHESS?? 😂
I found this old video of Lupe from league pong.

Close enough. I’m the most sore winner I’ve ever been around.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8122
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 12:06
BF004 wrote:
19 Aug 2022 11:44
Labrev wrote:
17 Aug 2022 16:46



Dude wtf, you talked trash IN CHESS?? 😂
I found this old video of Lupe from league pong.

Close enough. I’m the most sore winner I’ve ever been around.
If that guy did that in my face I would have made him my own personal Barry Badrinath.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 7828
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 11:42
APB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 10:20
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 06:20
If the D can get a consistent pass rush (for a change) to rattle Fields ......... turnovers should be plentiful assuming no King-like plays occur and Savage lives up to his last name, everything should be A-OK :aok:
What are your expectations for "consistent pass rush"? The Packers were top 3 in defensive pressures last year. I'd say your "for a change" caveat is waaaaay outdated.
Packers 2021 D was ranked 13th overall. Packers 2021 D ranked 15th in SACKS.
Expectations are based on the 1966 and 1996 Packers defensive performances. Might as well throw in the 1961 defense while we're at it :argue:
I see. You don't want "consistent pass rush" good. You want "historic overall defense" good. Should've just said so in the first place. :argue:

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

I know that it's just on paper and in practice right now. I know this post will verge into hyperbole.

But the types of goals and hopes I have for this defense are so fun. When I think about this defense I think:
  • How many quarters can we go without allowing a point? Without allowing a touchdown?
  • How many shutouts will we record?
  • How many games will the defense/ST score more points than they allow (defensive TDs, FGs) 3 games? 5 games?
I am thinking historic. I'm thinking smothering. Maybe the Vikings will score on their opening drive and the first week will be a shootout and all this calms down. But for now? Dominance. I'm ALL in on this side. And I'm not a "defense" guy. I like watching points. I enjoy it more. But this squad? It has me excited.

I mean look, I'm back on my bs with the list function again!

wallyuwl
Reactions:
Posts: 6207
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 20:39

Post by wallyuwl »

YoHoChecko wrote:
19 Aug 2022 13:29
I know that it's just on paper and in practice right now. I know this post will verge into hyperbole.

But the types of goals and hopes I have for this defense are so fun. When I think about this defense I think:
  • How many quarters can we go without allowing a point? Without allowing a touchdown?
  • How many shutouts will we record?
  • How many games will the defense/ST score more points than they allow (defensive TDs, FGs) 3 games? 5 games?
I am thinking historic. I'm thinking smothering. Maybe the Vikings will score on their opening drive and the first week will be a shootout and all this calms down. But for now? Dominance. I'm ALL in on this side. And I'm not a "defense" guy. I like watching points. I enjoy it more. But this squad? It has me excited.

I mean look, I'm back on my bs with the list function again!
What is the fewest points a Packers team has given up in a season?

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

wallyuwl wrote:
19 Aug 2022 13:39
YoHoChecko wrote:
19 Aug 2022 13:29
I know that it's just on paper and in practice right now. I know this post will verge into hyperbole.

But the types of goals and hopes I have for this defense are so fun. When I think about this defense I think:
  • How many quarters can we go without allowing a point? Without allowing a touchdown?
  • How many shutouts will we record?
  • How many games will the defense/ST score more points than they allow (defensive TDs, FGs) 3 games? 5 games?
I am thinking historic. I'm thinking smothering. Maybe the Vikings will score on their opening drive and the first week will be a shootout and all this calms down. But for now? Dominance. I'm ALL in on this side. And I'm not a "defense" guy. I like watching points. I enjoy it more. But this squad? It has me excited.

I mean look, I'm back on my bs with the list function again!
What is the fewest points a Packers team has given up in a season?
196 in 2022.
Image

Image

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

My concern with the defense is Savage and Stokes. I think teams are going to go at Stokes a ton because he won’t make QBs pay. His coverage is good but it doesn’t mean anything if he can’t make plays on the ball. QBs are going to trust their guys to make plays if he Stokes can’t do a better job getting turnovers. I’m concerned we see a big step back from him. Jaire, Amos, and Douglas will make a QB pay which leaves Stokes as the guy probably getting the most targets.

Savage needs to be a reliable tackler. His tackling is some of the most atrocious I’ve ever seen. To me it looks like he doesn’t want to which really irks me about defensive players. They should be looking to pile up on every tackle. Savage waits until someone else gets them down. He needs to try the Budda Baker/Earl Thomas technique of just going low and getting a leg. He looks tentative to get physical to me. One play against Dalvin Cook 2 years ago I swear he fell down early so he didn’t have to get involved in a tackle.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 3918
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

APB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 12:39
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 11:42
APB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 10:20


What are your expectations for "consistent pass rush"? The Packers were top 3 in defensive pressures last year. I'd say your "for a change" caveat is waaaaay outdated.
Packers 2021 D was ranked 13th overall. Packers 2021 D ranked 15th in SACKS.
Expectations are based on the 1966 and 1996 Packers defensive performances. Might as well throw in the 1961 defense while we're at it :argue:
I see. You don't want "consistent pass rush" good. You want "historic overall defense" good. Should've just said so in the first place. :argue:
:messedup:

Realist
Reactions:
Posts: 686
Joined: 12 Sep 2021 17:32

Post by Realist »

lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 16:46
My concern with the defense is Savage and Stokes. I think teams are going to go at Stokes a ton because he won’t make QBs pay. His coverage is good but it doesn’t mean anything if he can’t make plays on the ball. QBs are going to trust their guys to make plays if he Stokes can’t do a better job getting turnovers. I’m concerned we see a big step back from him. Jaire, Amos, and Douglas will make a QB pay which leaves Stokes as the guy probably getting the most targets.

Savage needs to be a reliable tackler. His tackling is some of the most atrocious I’ve ever seen. To me it looks like he doesn’t want to which really irks me about defensive players. They should be looking to pile up on every tackle. Savage waits until someone else gets them down. He needs to try the Budda Baker/Earl Thomas technique of just going low and getting a leg. He looks tentative to get physical to me. One play against Dalvin Cook 2 years ago I swear he fell down early so he didn’t have to get involved in a tackle.
I am a Stokes fan. I was stunned how well he played last year. Savage on the other hand will never be a tackler or is he even a safety. Best case scenario is that the front seven is as good as advertised. Savage could get some int's as a result. He has no interest in tackling.

User avatar
Labrev
Reactions:
Posts: 6487
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 00:01

Post by Labrev »

RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:04
APB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 12:39
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 11:42


Packers 2021 D was ranked 13th overall. Packers 2021 D ranked 15th in SACKS.
Expectations are based on the 1966 and 1996 Packers defensive performances. Might as well throw in the 1961 defense while we're at it :argue:
I see. You don't want "consistent pass rush" good. You want "historic overall defense" good. Should've just said so in the first place. :argue:
:messedup:
:lol:
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”
—Magneto

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 3918
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

Labrev wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:23
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:04
APB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 12:39


I see. You don't want "consistent pass rush" good. You want "historic overall defense" good. Should've just said so in the first place. :argue:
:messedup:
:lol:
:lol:

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:16
lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 16:46
My concern with the defense is Savage and Stokes. I think teams are going to go at Stokes a ton because he won’t make QBs pay. His coverage is good but it doesn’t mean anything if he can’t make plays on the ball. QBs are going to trust their guys to make plays if he Stokes can’t do a better job getting turnovers. I’m concerned we see a big step back from him. Jaire, Amos, and Douglas will make a QB pay which leaves Stokes as the guy probably getting the most targets.

Savage needs to be a reliable tackler. His tackling is some of the most atrocious I’ve ever seen. To me it looks like he doesn’t want to which really irks me about defensive players. They should be looking to pile up on every tackle. Savage waits until someone else gets them down. He needs to try the Budda Baker/Earl Thomas technique of just going low and getting a leg. He looks tentative to get physical to me. One play against Dalvin Cook 2 years ago I swear he fell down early so he didn’t have to get involved in a tackle.
I am a Stokes fan. I was stunned how well he played last year. Savage on the other hand will never be a tackler or is he even a safety. Best case scenario is that the front seven is as good as advertised. Savage could get some int's as a result. He has no interest in tackling.
Stokes right now is the same thing to me as Jaire in his rookie year and King before him and Randall before him. I thought he played well for a rookie. As an overall corner it was just an average year I felt. He needs to stack success and take that next step developing his weaknesses. Jaire did that. The other two did not. So far Stokes been getting his cheeks clapped harder than an Onlyfans page in camp. I think he’s a gamer so we will see when the season starts but I expect he is the one who gets picked on.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

Realist
Reactions:
Posts: 686
Joined: 12 Sep 2021 17:32

Post by Realist »

lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:32
Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:16
lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 16:46
My concern with the defense is Savage and Stokes. I think teams are going to go at Stokes a ton because he won’t make QBs pay. His coverage is good but it doesn’t mean anything if he can’t make plays on the ball. QBs are going to trust their guys to make plays if he Stokes can’t do a better job getting turnovers. I’m concerned we see a big step back from him. Jaire, Amos, and Douglas will make a QB pay which leaves Stokes as the guy probably getting the most targets.

Savage needs to be a reliable tackler. His tackling is some of the most atrocious I’ve ever seen. To me it looks like he doesn’t want to which really irks me about defensive players. They should be looking to pile up on every tackle. Savage waits until someone else gets them down. He needs to try the Budda Baker/Earl Thomas technique of just going low and getting a leg. He looks tentative to get physical to me. One play against Dalvin Cook 2 years ago I swear he fell down early so he didn’t have to get involved in a tackle.
I am a Stokes fan. I was stunned how well he played last year. Savage on the other hand will never be a tackler or is he even a safety. Best case scenario is that the front seven is as good as advertised. Savage could get some int's as a result. He has no interest in tackling.
Stokes right now is the same thing to me as Jaire in his rookie year and King before him and Randall before him. I thought he played well for a rookie. As an overall corner it was just an average year I felt. He needs to stack success and take that next step developing his weaknesses. Jaire did that. The other two did not. So far Stokes been getting his cheeks clapped harder than an Onlyfans page in camp. I think he’s a gamer so we will see when the season starts but I expect he is the one who gets picked on.
I don't remember King or Randall being as good as Stokes year one with the eye test. Could be wrong.

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 3918
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:37
lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:32
Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:16


I am a Stokes fan. I was stunned how well he played last year. Savage on the other hand will never be a tackler or is he even a safety. Best case scenario is that the front seven is as good as advertised. Savage could get some int's as a result. He has no interest in tackling.
Stokes right now is the same thing to me as Jaire in his rookie year and King before him and Randall before him. I thought he played well for a rookie. As an overall corner it was just an average year I felt. He needs to stack success and take that next step developing his weaknesses. Jaire did that. The other two did not. So far Stokes been getting his cheeks clapped harder than an Onlyfans page in camp. I think he’s a gamer so we will see when the season starts but I expect he is the one who gets picked on.
I don't remember King or Randall being as good as Stokes year one with the eye test. Could be wrong.
Stokes is off the chart compared to Randall and King in their first years. Same goes for the over-hyped Terrell Buckley.

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 12093
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:54
Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:37
lupedafiasco wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:32


Stokes right now is the same thing to me as Jaire in his rookie year and King before him and Randall before him. I thought he played well for a rookie. As an overall corner it was just an average year I felt. He needs to stack success and take that next step developing his weaknesses. Jaire did that. The other two did not. So far Stokes been getting his cheeks clapped harder than an Onlyfans page in camp. I think he’s a gamer so we will see when the season starts but I expect he is the one who gets picked on.
I don't remember King or Randall being as good as Stokes year one with the eye test. Could be wrong.
Stokes is off the chart compared to Randall and King in their first years. Same goes for the over-hyped Terrell Buckley.
Buckley, boy you sure can bring bad memory's, next it'll be Manderich :rotf:

people sure get on Savage, kids played in a different D scheme every season, he was solid as a rookie in Capers single high, then exploded his 2nd season in Pettines free lancing schemes, then struggled back in the more basic single high, I'd like to see Barry use more cover 2, and rotate his safety's, now adding Walker that might happen, either way, I think Savage is better then what we saw last year.

Realist
Reactions:
Posts: 686
Joined: 12 Sep 2021 17:32

Post by Realist »

Yoop wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:16
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:54
Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:37


I don't remember King or Randall being as good as Stokes year one with the eye test. Could be wrong.
Stokes is off the chart compared to Randall and King in their first years. Same goes for the over-hyped Terrell Buckley.
Buckley, boy you sure can bring bad memory's, next it'll be Manderich :rotf:

people sure get on Savage, kids played in a different D scheme every season, he was solid as a rookie in Capers single high, then exploded his 2nd season in Pettines free lancing schemes, then struggled back in the more basic single high, I'd like to see Barry use more cover 2, and rotate his safety's, now adding Walker that might happen, either way, I think Savage is better then what we saw last year.
If Savage were to ever explode, you would feel it.

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 12093
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:23
Yoop wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:16
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
19 Aug 2022 17:54


Stokes is off the chart compared to Randall and King in their first years. Same goes for the over-hyped Terrell Buckley.
Buckley, boy you sure can bring bad memory's, next it'll be Manderich :rotf:

people sure get on Savage, kids played in a different D scheme every season, he was solid as a rookie in Capers single high, then exploded his 2nd season in Pettines free lancing schemes, then struggled back in the more basic single high, I'd like to see Barry use more cover 2, and rotate his safety's, now adding Walker that might happen, either way, I think Savage is better then what we saw last year.
If Savage were to ever explode, you would feel it.
he was the hottest safety in the league the 2nd half of 2020

Realist
Reactions:
Posts: 686
Joined: 12 Sep 2021 17:32

Post by Realist »

Yoop wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:48
Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:23
Yoop wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:16


Buckley, boy you sure can bring bad memory's, next it'll be Manderich :rotf:

people sure get on Savage, kids played in a different D scheme every season, he was solid as a rookie in Capers single high, then exploded his 2nd season in Pettines free lancing schemes, then struggled back in the more basic single high, I'd like to see Barry use more cover 2, and rotate his safety's, now adding Walker that might happen, either way, I think Savage is better then what we saw last year.
If Savage were to ever explode, you would feel it.
he was the hottest safety in the league the 2nd half of 2020
Ok.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8122
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 20:27
Yoop wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:48
Realist wrote:
19 Aug 2022 18:23


If Savage were to ever explode, you would feel it.
he was the hottest safety in the league the 2nd half of 2020
Ok.
He was really good during that stretch, but hasn’t been consistent and hasn’t ever reached that kind of peak.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

Post Reply