Green Bay Packers News 2022
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
Anyway…
I’m actually a little curious if the Packers training staff, notoriously conservative, gives Rodgers the “all-clear” this week.
I’m actually a little curious if the Packers training staff, notoriously conservative, gives Rodgers the “all-clear” this week.
This training staff never leaves it solely up to the player. If there is traumatic internal bruising, for example, there’s potential for further damage and long term complications.
As I said, I’m curious which direction they go.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I think it's probably time we introduce da bares to their new owner.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
I want to go back and see the Play Clock of when Love snapped the ball. I am curious now.
play clock is a pet peeve of Huddle forum members, I think it has to do with having a high scoring offense and a attempt a burning game clock with having a lead, as well as Rodgers trying to out think a defense, it's cost us a few untimely time outs over the years, which is easy to see, whats unseen are the benefits it's provided, which I'am sure it has, Rodgers has been very good at getting a defense to change coverages, creating mis matches, I think the angst over it is over blown myself.
- Crazylegs Starks
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3719
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
- Location: Northern WI
Actually Rodgers' pre-snap reads (particularly on RPO's) have been off a lot this year. The benefits just aren't happening regularly for whatever reason.Yoop wrote: ↑29 Nov 2022 12:38play clock is a pet peeve of Huddle forum members, I think it has to do with having a high scoring offense and a attempt a burning game clock with having a lead, as well as Rodgers trying to out think a defense, it's cost us a few untimely time outs over the years, which is easy to see, whats unseen are the benefits it's provided, which I'am sure it has, Rodgers has been very good at getting a defense to change coverages, creating mis matches, I think the angst over it is over blown myself.
Regardless, the issue seems to be LaFleur getting the play in slow sometimes, his system's ridiculously long play verbiage, and Rodgers staring too long at the defense. Considering this happened under MM, too... I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'...
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi
- Vince Lombardi
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 27 Mar 2020 14:45
I think the problem people here have with the late clock is twofold. One is they often break the huddle with less then 10 seconds on the clock. Second is we never change it up. We'll have two consecutive 3 and outs but come back and do the same thing. Other teams quick snap just to keep the defense off guard. We only do it to get a free play.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
That and the timeouts we have to take, but I think that has been better lately.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
My issue with our clock management primarily revolves around using timeouts, not allowing enough pre-snap motion and allowing the opposing defenders to time the snap count because they know it's always going to be snapped with 0 seconds left.