Nixon Watch

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Post Reply
User avatar
Scott4Pack
Reactions:
Posts: 2929
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
Location: New Mexico

Nixon Watch

Post by Scott4Pack »

I’m hoping above all hope that the Packers keep Keisean Nixon. He has proven that he is a difference maker as a return guy. The only two problems are 1) Packers have proven to be luke warm to ST game-breakers in the past, and 2) this is another guy they’d have to pay well.

Anyhow, I’m starting this thread with the hope that all Nixon-related news would be posted here. I don’t want to miss any of it.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!

User avatar
BSA
Reactions:
Posts: 1869
Joined: 14 Aug 2020 09:20
Location: Oeschinensee

Post by BSA »

.

If we're going to have a Nixon Watch, maybe we should watch some Nixon


https://www.packers.com/video/keisean-n ... vs-vikings


https://www.nfl.com/videos/keisean-nixo ... off-return
IT. IS. TIME

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Nixon is the only pending free agent I think the team NEEDs to sign.

Next up would be Reed, for me, just because the DLine is so thin and we need a backup plan if Wyatt and Slaton don't take the steps we hope. He was a solid player for us and shouldn't cost much.

But yeah, this thread is the right one. The only free agent that merits such attention being paid. I'm not sure how much a top return guy with some secondary versatility and usefulness gets paid, but we have to make it happen.

What do we think? $4 million? $6 million?

User avatar
BSA
Reactions:
Posts: 1869
Joined: 14 Aug 2020 09:20
Location: Oeschinensee

Post by BSA »

YoHoChecko wrote:
22 Feb 2023 13:32
What do we think? $4 million? $6 million?
seems about right.
He has only earned 3 M in his career so far, guessing he wants some gtd money on this deal

https://overthecap.com/player/keisean-nixon/8152

OTC valuation for 2022 was $ 2.68M , but I don't know how they arrive at that number or how his ST skills are counted
IT. IS. TIME

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 12341
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

the top 3 returners also play a backup roll on offense and defense and make roughly 6 mil average, Nixon I expect will want that, I think I read he had 280 touches on defense for us last year

If ya go by ol Bill Parcels standard of 100 yrds of field position = 7 pts, it's a bargain

User avatar
Cdragon
Reactions:
Posts: 3239
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 05:18
Location: Robert Brook's home town

Post by Cdragon »

Pay the man. And give him a few touches on O while we're at it. :beer2:

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14467
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Image

I thought he was dead?
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
Bogey
Reactions:
Posts: 608
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 22:22
Location: Green Bay

Post by Bogey »

Pckfn23 wrote:
22 Feb 2023 16:15
Image

I thought he was dead?
:rotf:
The Packers lunatic fringe is more visible because of sheer numbers. The Packers have one of the largest fan bases in all of sports. If the fringe percentage is the same as with other teams, then we end up with larger volumes of nut jobs. - JustJeff

User avatar
Raptorman
Reactions:
Posts: 3576
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 19:39
Location: East coast of Florida

Post by Raptorman »

Pckfn23 wrote:
22 Feb 2023 16:15
Image

I thought he was dead?
My first thought when I read the thread title was "what the hell does Watergate have to do with football". We are a product of our experiences.

Post Reply