BSA wrote: ↑01 Mar 2023 12:09
Baks deal was always going to get re-done. The Packers and Bak knew it at the time, that's how every team manages the cap. If you're genuinely interested in helping Love succeed - then giving him an elite LT is super important for a variety of reasons. One of which is needing to chip and help a not-elite LT; that limits the playbook, limits the weapons you can deploy and hamstrings the play caller in certain situations.
Andy Reid is one of the best coaches in NFL history and his famous comment in the job interview was:
"Gimme a QB, 2 OTs, 2 corners,2 edges and I'll figure the rest out."
Elite LT play is something every top coach wants and GB already has one in- house who knows the offense and plays at an elite level.
Zach Tom is 2 years away from that level of play IF he's even capable, which is not certain by any means. Same for Nijman
First of all, thanks for the well-wishes on being sick of it; it was a turn of phrase, but I actually did write it in the midst of a stomach flu.
But yes, Bakh's deal was always going to be re-done to a degree on an annual basis. It was structured that way. But what irritates me is that when you see a guy like Aaron Jones (and I totally get the positional value difference) say "I'll take a pay cut to make this work" and a guy like Bakhtiari who has renegotiation conversations each year as a result of his contract structure, he can do nothing for us for a 2-year period and continue to take simple renegotiations, give nothing back, and back us into a cap corner in the coming years.
And I do worry about the cap--not in that I think it's a huge restraint that we can't get around, but that bad contracts = dead money = limited flexibility into the future. I know some have expressed the opinion that dead money doesn't matter anymore because of cap rollover, but that's just not true. Dead cap money is, explicitly, money paid to a player on the presumption of that player lasting longer on the team than he did, or contributing more to the team than he did. Dead cap money is money spent that is not earned. It's no different than buying out a coach's contract.
David Bakhtiari, if we never pay him another dime, has $23 million left on our cap. We've pushed the accounting back for his cash input each year. And now we owe him more than his position's franchise tag number in dead money, alone. The only way to mitigate that cost is if he sticks around longer. What doesn't have an impact, to me, is pushing it back from 2023 to 2025, which is essentially what we're doing by renegotiating.
When you utilize void years and cut contracts short, you create dead money. At some point, you have to pay the piper, or else you are permanently operating on a lower functional salary cap number than teams who are not still paying dead money for contracts that did not pan out. You're not still paying off the accounting for bonuses that were not fully earned.
When you are trying to win a championship in a set window of time, you have incentive to move that money around or back a little. I don't love the strategy; for every Tampa Bay Super Bowl there's a decade of Saints or Packers close calls to point to as a result of these types of maneuvers. But I understood trying to make sure, from 2020-2021 that we had that best chance. And I really thought 2022 would go better.
But if we move on from Rodgers to Love, I am far less concerned about 2023 (current) salary cap space than I am with 2024 and 2025 salary cap space. We did a lot of kicking the can, and prudent team management--the way our team ran itself for years--says you eat your losses and open up opportunities to utilize the full cap quickly, rather than continuing to push those numbers out and increase the dead space.
If it's for a player you plan to keep around, like Kenny Clark, so be it. But Bakhtiari is turning 32 and has 2 years on his deal. Pushing money past the end of that deal is not a reasonable or wise use of 2023 cap. It just isn't. And as someone who got a degree in Sports Business with the intent of working in cap management, I enjoy caring about the cap, and understanding the mechanisms and monitoring the outcomes and consequences of various approaches. It's a fun activity for me, and something I don't know as well as I used to, but I still know better than the average fan. And I think that pushing $9 million more dollars in dead money into a deal that already has $23 million in dead money for a 32 year old player that has struggled mightily with staying healthy is a poor choice.