Packers Sign WR Travis Fulgham

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Post Reply
User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Packers Sign WR Travis Fulgham

Post by Packfntk »

Who says we did not add any WR's in the offseason?







Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Mediocre speed, very good agility drills. 36.5" vert and 10'6" broad are solid, too. So he's not athletically lacking
image.png
image.png (23.89 KiB) Viewed 354 times

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Just to immediately over-hype our waiver claim :lol:
image.png
image.png (10.76 KiB) Viewed 347 times
:rotf:

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14473
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

We officially LOVE tall recievers. I want to go back and see the height of every receiver we brought in over the last 2+ years.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Pckfn23 wrote:
10 Aug 2020 18:44
We officially LOVE tall recievers. I want to go back and see the height of every receiver we brought in over the last 2+ years.
I mean, yes, we have

Pre-2018
Moore: 6' 2 5/8"
MVS: 6'4"
EQSB: 6' 4 3/4"
Kumerow: 6' 4 1/2"

Late 2018, we claimed:
Allen Lazard: 6' 4 5/8"

But the 2019 offseason saw us add
Darrius Shepherd: 5'10 1/2" and
Malik Taylor: 6' 1 3/8"

And this offseason, while we did add
Devin Fucnhess: 6' 4 1/4"

We also added
Reggie Begelton: 6' 1 1/8" and
Darrell Stewart: 6' 0 1/2"

before adding
Travis Fulgham: 6' 2 3/8"

and allegedly in the process of adding
Malik Turner: 6' 2"

There were probably some camp bodies in there that I missed somewhere, but it's clearly a thing that we like guys that are at least 6'2" but not one we won't break especially for a slot receiver type like Stewart or Shepherd.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

On the downside, here are some receivers that the Lions preferred over Travis:

Marvin Hall, 5'10" 190 pounds; 4th year in the league, 2 teams; recorded 19 catches for 470 yards across 3 seasons, with 1 TD per season; part-time K/P returner

Geramy Davis, 6'3" 217 pounds; 6th year in the league, 3 teams; recorded 5 catches for 59 yards in his career with 0 TDs

Victor Bolden, 5'8", 178 pounds; 3rd year in the league, 3 teams; 1 catch for 10 yards; was a rookie returner

Tom Kennedy, 5'10" 195 pounds; 2nd year in the league, was UDFA by Detroit last year, no stats.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5327
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

Camp body.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

lupedafiasco wrote:
11 Aug 2020 09:56
Camp body.
Probably, but I'd estimate that there's probably 1 WR slot that isn't totally locked in yet, and any of these 4-5 camp bodies (Taylor, Turner, Shepherd, Stewart, Begelton) at the position could claim it with a strong camp.

User avatar
TheGreenMan
Reactions:
Posts: 1709
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 07:01
Location: Iowa

Post by TheGreenMan »

Really wonder what Michael Clark would have become if he stuck it out.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5327
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

TheGreenMan wrote:
11 Aug 2020 15:06
Really wonder what Michael Clark would have become if he stuck it out.
Very few receivers that big make it based on their inability to separate. If they could they would have been drafted very high. Clark just didn’t have good enough hands or athleticism to make it in the league.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
TheGreenMan
Reactions:
Posts: 1709
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 07:01
Location: Iowa

Post by TheGreenMan »

lupedafiasco wrote:
11 Aug 2020 15:09
TheGreenMan wrote:
11 Aug 2020 15:06
Really wonder what Michael Clark would have become if he stuck it out.
Very few receivers that big make it based on their inability to separate. If they could they would have been drafted very high. Clark just didn’t have good enough hands or athleticism to make it in the league.
He retired, which came as a surprise to everyone in the front office, because he was turning heads with his athletic showings in just the little time he was with the team. He had a 33-inch vertical at 6"6. He also ran a 4.53, Adams ran a 4.56 in the 40. Dude had a knack of grabbing balls left and right in practice.

Clark walked away on his own terms, not because he couldn't cut it.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
bud fox
Reactions:
Posts: 1808
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 17:28

Post by bud fox »

Talented pick up just adds to a impressive group

No excuses from Rodgers this year with the talent and proven ability we have in the receiving game.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8293
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

bud fox wrote:
11 Aug 2020 17:45
Talented pick up just adds to a impressive group

No excuses from Rodgers this year with the talent and proven ability we have in the receiving game.
:violin:
Image

Read More. Post Less.

Post Reply