2023 NFL Draft Discussion
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
I can see it with RB's, if there very good there over used and teams are scared to pay them top money.
TE is a position on the rise, often though, at least in the past TE was a blocking position, rather then pay a second contract fortune, teams just start over, TE is a after thought position simply because teams feature WR in there passing schemes, but that is now changing, some of the best teams in the league have receiving TE's that play a huge roll in there passing schemes.
Lber is a lot harder position to do well as a 3 down lber, teams that have good ones hold onto them, the reason so many don't get second contracts is because they are 2 down run pluggers and rotate out on passing downs because they become a liability in coverage.
good news for us and Meyers, last years decline seems like mostly a whole OL thing and a anomaly, center is basically a none miss draft position, I expect Meyers will bounce back strong.
TE is a position on the rise, often though, at least in the past TE was a blocking position, rather then pay a second contract fortune, teams just start over, TE is a after thought position simply because teams feature WR in there passing schemes, but that is now changing, some of the best teams in the league have receiving TE's that play a huge roll in there passing schemes.
Lber is a lot harder position to do well as a 3 down lber, teams that have good ones hold onto them, the reason so many don't get second contracts is because they are 2 down run pluggers and rotate out on passing downs because they become a liability in coverage.
good news for us and Meyers, last years decline seems like mostly a whole OL thing and a anomaly, center is basically a none miss draft position, I expect Meyers will bounce back strong.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I just want to throw it here, for posterity, that one of my primary issues--if not the primary issue--with draft coverage is that it has become too pick-based and not enough class-based or big picture.
Almost all the networks now have "pick by pick" analysis or grades. Most of the reviews go through a class and ask analysts to name "the player/pick that stands out to them" where you list a guy you like or a guy you didn't like.
Not enough wholistic "the team had X objectives to accomplish and they set about it through this overall class." Not enough stylistic or theoretical review, like "was there a theme to this class or a takeaway we can learn about the team from this overall class." The only team getting coverage at all like that is the Colts with their penchant for ultra-athletes, and occasionally the Eagles with "use free agency to go into the draft ready to play a game to add flexibility to your draft picks."
Anyway, just a thought that bugs me. Too much focus on picks. Not enough on classes. Not enough big picture and whole-team analysis.
Almost all the networks now have "pick by pick" analysis or grades. Most of the reviews go through a class and ask analysts to name "the player/pick that stands out to them" where you list a guy you like or a guy you didn't like.
Not enough wholistic "the team had X objectives to accomplish and they set about it through this overall class." Not enough stylistic or theoretical review, like "was there a theme to this class or a takeaway we can learn about the team from this overall class." The only team getting coverage at all like that is the Colts with their penchant for ultra-athletes, and occasionally the Eagles with "use free agency to go into the draft ready to play a game to add flexibility to your draft picks."
Anyway, just a thought that bugs me. Too much focus on picks. Not enough on classes. Not enough big picture and whole-team analysis.
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
Packers' draft improved their betting odds to win the North, +410 pre-draft to +330, just ahead of MIN and DET (both +350).
https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/news/nfl ... north-odds
Empty WR and TE rooms was a big weight on our odds, but our draft helped address that concern, albeit with unproven guys.
https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/news/nfl ... north-odds
Empty WR and TE rooms was a big weight on our odds, but our draft helped address that concern, albeit with unproven guys.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
I kinda wish NE didn't so NYJ could take Jones and he'd play well enough to shore up T, then people wouldn't be able to make this excuse for Rodgers (not without looking silly, at any rate).TheSkeptic wrote: ↑05 May 2023 02:50Nothing wrong with that. Keeping the Jets down makes it a lot easier for the Pats to make the playoffs. I'd expect the Packers to do the same to Da Bears
Or maybe they should be attacking the Jets FO for "sitting on their hands" (a favorite saying of some Packer fans) rather than getting Rodgers the HALP he needs.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I do wonder, though, if the “that’s a good one” was a comment in our draft pick, or in the fact that we picked someone who was not their target. Like was the context “that’s a good pick” or “that pick is good for us”?
Earlier in the video, he seemed to predict that we’d take McDonald, who was their ultimate pick.
Earlier in the video, he seemed to predict that we’d take McDonald, who was their ultimate pick.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
Face value most likely. He’s just a good pick at that point in the draft, whether we pick him. I’d say he’s saying it like he admires the athlete.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑27 May 2023 09:33I do wonder, though, if the “that’s a good one” was a comment in our draft pick, or in the fact that we picked someone who was not their target. Like was the context “that’s a good pick” or “that pick is good for us”?
Earlier in the video, he seemed to predict that we’d take McDonald, who was their ultimate pick.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
That's how I took it too. Similar in my fantasy drafts where people shout out "Nice pick" except I immediately make note of who said it so I can potentially bait them with a trade later on.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑27 May 2023 12:56Face value most likely. He’s just a good pick at that point in the draft, whether we pick him. I’d say he’s saying it like he admires the athlete.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑27 May 2023 09:33I do wonder, though, if the “that’s a good one” was a comment in our draft pick, or in the fact that we picked someone who was not their target. Like was the context “that’s a good pick” or “that pick is good for us”?
Earlier in the video, he seemed to predict that we’d take McDonald, who was their ultimate pick.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I took it that way too; I just wondered if I am preordained to interpret it that way because he’s a player on my favorite tan so I want to take it that way.
But this was validating. Thanks for the replies
But this was validating. Thanks for the replies
Salah says McDonald was there guy all along, if ya buy that I got a pond in the middle of the salt flats ya might be interested in I think the whole reason Douglas balked at switching picks with us is because he would miss on one of the top 4 tackles, probably had a inkling NE would get trade offers to jump them for one, which did happen, likely he had a list of 2nd choices and McDonald was on it, even though many had McDonald ranked late 1 or early 2nd round.
when he said LVN was a good pick, and then to take McDonald 2 picks later, leads me to believe LVN was also a second choice player on that list and probably higher on it then McDonald, heck the whole football world figured there first pick would go OL, including Douglas.
when Pittsburg came a calling Billy B was more then happy to oblige them and put the screws to the team he's had a personal grudge with for many years
when he said LVN was a good pick, and then to take McDonald 2 picks later, leads me to believe LVN was also a second choice player on that list and probably higher on it then McDonald, heck the whole football world figured there first pick would go OL, including Douglas.
when Pittsburg came a calling Billy B was more then happy to oblige them and put the screws to the team he's had a personal grudge with for many years
The real-time conversations involving the Cardinals/Texans as they worked through compensation for the No. 3 pick. Interesting stuff.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 592
- Joined: 27 Mar 2020 22:22
Both of those videos are super cool. thanks!