NFL 2023 Schedule Release
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
Only way 12 doesnt play 65% of the snaps is if 12 gets hurt. Which is a real possibility.
We just saw the packers have almost no shot at the playoffs and he still insisted on playing.
HOF players want their stats, they dont sit healthy on the bench for a draft pick.
This "problem" is a non issue
We just saw the packers have almost no shot at the playoffs and he still insisted on playing.
HOF players want their stats, they dont sit healthy on the bench for a draft pick.
This "problem" is a non issue
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
The bigger message is "the Packers have almost no shot at the playoffs" turned into the Packers are "win and in" on Week 18.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:39Only way 12 doesnt play 65% of the snaps is if 12 gets hurt. Which is a real possibility.
We just saw the packers have almost no shot at the playoffs and he still insisted on playing.
HOF players want their stats, they dont sit healthy on the bench for a draft pick.
This "problem" is a non issue
7 playoff teams changed a lot of things. The Lions were 1-6 and were a play away in a Seattle OT game from the playoffs.
No team is eliminated until mid-December now. A three game win streak can change everything.
playoffs? You kidding me? Playoffs, I just hope we can win another game, some comments mark time, Jim Mora 2001 Colts
the reporter that asked the question became a coach, heres the story line.
https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2021/11/2 ... nniversary
the reporter that asked the question became a coach, heres the story line.
https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2021/11/2 ... nniversary
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
I’m seeing this already, in my limited search for tix at Denver. Gonna be hard to find tix under $400 there. Eish.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
Agreed, that’s why I think talks of sitting a healthy rodgers over a draft pick is a nothing burgergo pak go wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:57The bigger message is "the Packers have almost no shot at the playoffs" turned into the Packers are "win and in" on Week 18.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:39Only way 12 doesnt play 65% of the snaps is if 12 gets hurt. Which is a real possibility.
We just saw the packers have almost no shot at the playoffs and he still insisted on playing.
HOF players want their stats, they dont sit healthy on the bench for a draft pick.
This "problem" is a non issue
7 playoff teams changed a lot of things. The Lions were 1-6 and were a play away in a Seattle OT game from the playoffs.
No team is eliminated until mid-December now. A three game win streak can change everything.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
I'm not fantasizing over any of it. I mostly agree that it's highly, HIGHLY unlikely any of this would ever play out. I was simply expounding on YOUR own dreamed up "late one or early 2" statement.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:37you are dreaming up a problem that wont exist. The Jets would literally have to be about 0-7 for that to ever cross their mind. And even still, Rodgers wants stats, the fans want to see rodgers. they aint just sitting a healthy rodgers. thats a fantasy.APB wrote: ↑12 May 2023 07:16
While I agree with the "buzz" sentiment, it wouldn't be a difference between a "late one or early 2". If the Jets season is lost, they're likely positioned for an early R1. That's significant. I'd guess they'd give strong consideration to sitting Rodgers over some soft-tissue injury nonsense to retain that high pick. I know I would.
APB wrote: ↑12 May 2023 16:06I'm not fantasizing over any of it. I mostly agree that it's highly, HIGHLY unlikely any of this would ever play out. I was simply expounding on YOUR own dreamed up "late one or early 2" statement.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:37you are dreaming up a problem that wont exist. The Jets would literally have to be about 0-7 for that to ever cross their mind. And even still, Rodgers wants stats, the fans want to see rodgers. they aint just sitting a healthy rodgers. thats a fantasy.APB wrote: ↑12 May 2023 07:16
While I agree with the "buzz" sentiment, it wouldn't be a difference between a "late one or early 2". If the Jets season is lost, they're likely positioned for an early R1. That's significant. I'd guess they'd give strong consideration to sitting Rodgers over some soft-tissue injury nonsense to retain that high pick. I know I would.
Late one if he plays and plays well, early two if they pull the plug and they suck, early one if they suck and he plays. It is what it is. Tomato, tomaaato. Point being, they ain’t commanding a healthy 12 to ride pine over a draft pick.
I was just debating you where you said you would pull the plug and force rodgers to sit if they have a bad start. I don’t see this scenario as a possibility.
I don’t think the clause was put into the trade to cover for the jets sucking, I think it was protection for the possibility of an old man getting injured.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Packers fans become savages when players leave for other teams, give us 66% of the snaps and step out in front of a cement truck you traitor oh ya the Jets suck to, and loss every game, and don't call us , we'll call youDrj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:37you are dreaming up a problem that wont exist. The Jets would literally have to be about 0-7 for that to ever cross their mind. And even still, Rodgers wants stats, the fans want to see rodgers. they aint just sitting a healthy rodgers. thats a fantasy.APB wrote: ↑12 May 2023 07:16
While I agree with the "buzz" sentiment, it wouldn't be a difference between a "late one or early 2". If the Jets season is lost, they're likely positioned for an early R1. That's significant. I'd guess they'd give strong consideration to sitting Rodgers over some soft-tissue injury nonsense to retain that high pick. I know I would.
I think this is a two year window, first year to get everyone settled in and give it a shot in 2024
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4172
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Other AFC teams like the Chiefs, Bills, Bengals and maybe even the Ravens, will shove the J-E-T-S back to where they were idling watching the Chiefs and Bengals excel. There is plenty of history to recall here in Titletown that occurred over the past decade. T'was basically a textbook case of underachieving.Yoop wrote: ↑12 May 2023 19:32Packers fans become savages when players leave for other teams, give us 66% of the snaps and step out in front of a cement truck you traitor oh ya the Jets suck to, and loss every game, and don't call us , we'll call youDrj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:37you are dreaming up a problem that wont exist. The Jets would literally have to be about 0-7 for that to ever cross their mind. And even still, Rodgers wants stats, the fans want to see rodgers. they aint just sitting a healthy rodgers. thats a fantasy.APB wrote: ↑12 May 2023 07:16
While I agree with the "buzz" sentiment, it wouldn't be a difference between a "late one or early 2". If the Jets season is lost, they're likely positioned for an early R1. That's significant. I'd guess they'd give strong consideration to sitting Rodgers over some soft-tissue injury nonsense to retain that high pick. I know I would.
I think this is a two year window, first year to get everyone settled in and give it a shot in 2024
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
I just noticed we will be playing the Lions on Thursday, both engagements. That's crazy.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Earlier you buy the more you will pay. Best time is at the stadium with kickoff imminent.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 15:29Agreed, that’s why I think talks of sitting a healthy rodgers over a draft pick is a nothing burgergo pak go wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:57The bigger message is "the Packers have almost no shot at the playoffs" turned into the Packers are "win and in" on Week 18.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 May 2023 12:39Only way 12 doesnt play 65% of the snaps is if 12 gets hurt. Which is a real possibility.
We just saw the packers have almost no shot at the playoffs and he still insisted on playing.
HOF players want their stats, they dont sit healthy on the bench for a draft pick.
This "problem" is a non issue
7 playoff teams changed a lot of things. The Lions were 1-6 and were a play away in a Seattle OT game from the playoffs.
No team is eliminated until mid-December now. A three game win streak can change everything.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2929
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
Just bought tickets for the Bronco game on October 22!
I have great memories in that stadium too. I was at the game so many years ago when Favre threw a long TD to Jennings on the first play of OT. That was a great game. Seemed like it was over before the OT even began. (Back then, first score in OT won.)
I have great memories in that stadium too. I was at the game so many years ago when Favre threw a long TD to Jennings on the first play of OT. That was a great game. Seemed like it was over before the OT even began. (Back then, first score in OT won.)
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4172
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Yeah, it might be all the way down in the 50s on Nov 5.
I remember trick-or-treating as a kid in Sheboygan and it being well below 50 some years. Finding costumes that fit over our winter jackets could be a pain. Has global warm...er, I mean climate change...had that big of an impact on temps since my youth?
Early Nov GB high is around 50. Often trick or treating is over 60. Rams have no argument trying to get the game moved, especially in early Nov.
I know what the article says, but to me the Rams are just as upset as we where years back when we went to Dallas or SF for 3 and 4 seasons straight, the NFL schedulers do this stuff and it makes no sense to me