No, Packers are very low on that list with 3.paco wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023 10:19Is it possible this is 3 and outs defenses have caused, not how many the offense has had?
Saints @ Packers GDT: Sunday Sep 24 12:00pm CST
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Hopefully, we can overcome MLF’s lack of ability to coach during the game and win this one at home! Having the noise on our side should be a huge benefit to the offense.
Jones did go back inside though, while it seemed like Watson stayed out. So who knows. Someone also speculated by practice this week that Bak might be playing.
RIP JustJeff
that sounds better, we need both these guys.
I was impressed with the Niners last night, when ya have a stable like they do of skill position talent, then losing one or two can be over come, even without there #1 receiver they needed nothing more then they had last night to cruse to 3 or 4 score victories, course a top 5 defense doesn't hurt either, point is there very good at scoring, and that defense doesn't fold.
they have accomplished a goal we set out to do since 2014
I was impressed with the Niners last night, when ya have a stable like they do of skill position talent, then losing one or two can be over come, even without there #1 receiver they needed nothing more then they had last night to cruse to 3 or 4 score victories, course a top 5 defense doesn't hurt either, point is there very good at scoring, and that defense doesn't fold.
they have accomplished a goal we set out to do since 2014
You go from Bakh-Jenkins as your starters, arguably the best left-side of an OL in the league, to Walker-Newman/Rhyan... we can't just let one side of the OL fall off a cliff that badly, right? We gotta play Tom at LT, at least until Bakh gets back. That way, we have our best OL on the left side, at arguably the most important position on the 'line, next to your weakest link, then you have Walker (who has been doing okay) next to a reliably solid starter.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Last edited by Pckfn23 on 22 Sep 2023 15:12, edited 1 time in total.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- Backthepack4ever
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
- Contact:
Idk. This one is tough. I don't want to over think it like they didn't in the playoffs and move everyone around. Walker was good. Let him play and not move him around.Labrev wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023 13:26You go from Bakh-Jenkins as your starters, arguably the best left-side of an OL in the league, to Walker-Newman/Rhyan... we can't just let one side of the OL fall off a cliff that badly, right? We gotta play Tom at LT, at least until Bakh gets back. That way, we have our best OL on the left side, at arguably the most important position on the 'line, next to your weakest link, then you have Walker (who has been doing okay) next to a reliably solid starter.
Really the pass pro is fine. Run blocking and moving ppl hasn't been our game. I would like to see upgrades inside in the future with more power. Myers isn't the answer at center. The guards outside of Jenkins are just average imo.
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4173
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
It is becoming increasingly clear that the defense will determine Sunday's winner at Lambeau. The D line must dominate the line of scrimmage all day.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
I know that nothing is certain until Sunday. But “questionable” usually means that the guy will play, barring any setback between now and kickoff. Or, at least, he will start (if he’s a starter). Only God knows whether the guys will finish the game or not.
I’m trying to decide if Watson or Jones are more important to our scheme on this particular Sunday. But Bahktiari is crucial if we hope to have any consistent running and keeping Love clean.
I’m trying to decide if Watson or Jones are more important to our scheme on this particular Sunday. But Bahktiari is crucial if we hope to have any consistent running and keeping Love clean.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Questionable means nothing in the NFL. To this day I don’t understand why they removed probable. Last week Watson, Bak, and Jones were all questionable and none of them played.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023 15:51I know that nothing is certain until Sunday. But “questionable” usually means that the guy will play, barring any setback between now and kickoff. Or, at least, he will start (if he’s a starter). Only God knows whether the guys will finish the game or not.
I’m trying to decide if Watson or Jones are more important to our scheme on this particular Sunday. But Bahktiari is crucial if we hope to have any consistent running and keeping Love clean.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
The thing to look at is if they practiced. And if so, whether it was a full practice or a limited practice. “questionable” means just that, 50% chance. Unless it is Bakh in which case it is 25%.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023 23:09Questionable means nothing in the NFL. To this day I don’t understand why they removed probable. Last week Watson, Bak, and Jones were all questionable and none of them played.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Sep 2023 15:51I know that nothing is certain until Sunday. But “questionable” usually means that the guy will play, barring any setback between now and kickoff. Or, at least, he will start (if he’s a starter). Only God knows whether the guys will finish the game or not.
I’m trying to decide if Watson or Jones are more important to our scheme on this particular Sunday. But Bahktiari is crucial if we hope to have any consistent running and keeping Love clean.
- Backthepack4ever
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
- Contact:
I doubt Bak plays. Whatever. I'm to the point he's not really an option at least til later in the year so let Walker grow
We need the other players to get out there
We need the other players to get out there
Pretty much, yep. I don’t expect big things from the Packers this year and I certainly don’t expect Bakh to be back next year, at least not with how his knee has been. Soooo……Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑23 Sep 2023 08:11I doubt Bak plays. Whatever. I'm to the point he's not really an option at least til later in the year so let Walker grow
We need the other players to get out there
It’s a growth season for our youth. Let them grow, and let us all experience their growing pains.
Then watch out next year…
just wait till next year, next year this, next year that always been a instant gratification type rascal myself, promises to often turn empty, it's the road or the highway, no one gets to sit in the ditch to contemplate what might be
I tend to think we should play the new guys in the blow outs, it's a Teddy T. type a thing
I tend to think we should play the new guys in the blow outs, it's a Teddy T. type a thing
Good morning! Game Day!
The Packers lunatic fringe is more visible because of sheer numbers. The Packers have one of the largest fan bases in all of sports. If the fringe percentage is the same as with other teams, then we end up with larger volumes of nut jobs. - JustJeff