Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
Just rewatched the musgrave “drop”, I think that’s a way harder catch than some are giving credence to. His whole body and momentum was going to middle of field, and love threw a dart to his opposite side low. I don’t blame him.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
So what now? The coaches don't put players in position to play to their strengths or succeed. WR dropping passes. Love still is inaccurate and often late. OL not even average. RB2 slow and goes down easily (though today might have been his 2nd best game in the league).
The whole thing is a dumpster fire.
I doubt they beat the Broncos, at best 50:50. They might not win again this season with how Chicago looks lately.
The whole thing is a dumpster fire.
I doubt they beat the Broncos, at best 50:50. They might not win again this season with how Chicago looks lately.
Last edited by wallyuwl on 09 Oct 2023 22:45, edited 1 time in total.
Cant drop balls in the clutch. Neither( Doubs or Musgrave) helped their struggling QB. Both players were drafted to catch the ball. So, $%@# do it. I am being pissy I know but I hate when this team sucks, and they sure do right now.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 359
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 23:14
Losing to Josh McDaniels just feels like entering another realm of suckage.
And he even tried to give it to us at the end!lake shark wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 22:48Losing to Josh McDaniels just feels like entering another realm of suckage.
APB wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 22:50And he even tried to give it to us at the end!lake shark wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 22:48Losing to Josh McDaniels just feels like entering another realm of suckage.
23-13 with zero chance of a late game win if not for two missed FG
The important thing is we won the Carlson Bowl.
RIP JustJeff
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5332
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I hate to say I was right but…
Actually I do like to say it because this is the second time I’ve said while the team was enjoying a ton of success in terms of record but it was clear to see what was happening if anyone did any type of research what so ever.
Absolute &%$@ show at GM right now and in extension the president who hired both GM and coach.
Actually I do like to say it because this is the second time I’ve said while the team was enjoying a ton of success in terms of record but it was clear to see what was happening if anyone did any type of research what so ever.
Absolute &%$@ show at GM right now and in extension the president who hired both GM and coach.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
Crazy we are a miracle comeback away from bein 1-4 right now with our only win vs the Bears.
For years we have been hearing about passes 1mm off. We would freeze frame a play and say Rodgers should have got it to him in this instant.
Now it's "Love didn't have time because of the rush" "Love had to pass it behind him".
Changes.
So far we have been in every game this year save one. Except for the Lions we haven't been blown out. Mistakes by inexperienced players and OL issues did us in tonight. I figured this was gonna be a challenging season. Now we have some time to get some of our walking wounded back. Hopefully better days are ahead.
- GJPackerBacker
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18
The last throw to Watson was under thrown. A bettr QB doesn’t give the D an opportunity to INT the ball. If anything it should have been all the way to the corner. I know easy to say, not so easy to do. That’s why most of us not NFL QBs. The defender played the ball - good D bad for us. Love is on the learning curve, get better, fix the mistakes and you will do well. Don’t be afraid to use your legs.
Disappointing loss. The D stepped up several times including the stop after the first INT.
Raider fans were OK. I’m guessing not too many of them are from Oakland.
Hope you liked the pics I posted.
Go Pack Go.
Disappointing loss. The D stepped up several times including the stop after the first INT.
Raider fans were OK. I’m guessing not too many of them are from Oakland.
Hope you liked the pics I posted.
Go Pack Go.
GO PACK GO!!!
You absolutely love to say it. Exhaustively so.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 22:55I hate to say I was right but…
Actually I do like to say it because this is the second time I’ve said while the team was enjoying a ton of success in terms of record but it was clear to see what was happening if anyone did any type of research what so ever.
Absolute &%$@ show at GM right now and in extension the president who hired both GM and coach.
But, in my mind, it’s still premature to be making an absolute judgment. Yeah, he sucked against LV, an opponent this offense should have been able to score on, and he hasn’t been “good” outside of week one (and a half of play against NO) but there are reasons to be patient in judgment.
He’s shown, at times, pocket presence and good decision making. He needs consistency, though.
He’s shown command of the offense. I’m not convinced a good number of the errors we’re seeing are his fault, at least not entirely. If he’s throwing to a spot with the expectation of the receiver being there - and then he’s not- that’s not on Love. We, as fans, can never know for certain in those instances, but I’m sure it’s happening.
He’s also got the physical tools. That, I don’t think, is questioned.
Anyway, several reasons to not be throwing in the towel on the guy. That is, unless you’ve just got an axe to grind over and over and over…
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5332
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I would agree if he’s a rookie. This is year 4.APB wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 23:13You absolutely love to say it. Exhaustively so.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 22:55I hate to say I was right but…
Actually I do like to say it because this is the second time I’ve said while the team was enjoying a ton of success in terms of record but it was clear to see what was happening if anyone did any type of research what so ever.
Absolute &%$@ show at GM right now and in extension the president who hired both GM and coach.
But, in my mind, it’s still premature to be making an absolute judgment. Yeah, he sucked against LV, an opponent this offense should have been able to score on, and he hasn’t been “good” outside of week one (and a half of play against NO) but there are reasons to be patient in judgment.
He’s shown, at times, pocket presence and good decision making. He needs consistency, though.
He’s shown command of the offense. I’m not convinced a good number of the errors we’re seeing are his fault, at least not entirely. If he’s throwing to a spot with the expectation of the receiver being there - and then he’s not- that’s not on Love. We, as fans, can never know for certain in those instances, but I’m sure it’s happening.
He’s also got the physical tools. That, I don’t think, is questioned.
Anyway, several reasons to not be throwing in the towel on the guy. That is, unless you’ve just got an axe to grind over and over and over…
Cancelled by the forum elites.
But he is basically a rookie. Yes, he sat behind AR for 3 years but you don't learn how to be an NFL QB holding a clip board. AR sat behind Favre for 3 years. In Rodgers' first season, the Packers were 6-10, and he had some stinkers. This is still Love's 6th start. He has only thrown 215 passes in his career. Add to that, our pass catchers have something like 40 combined games played so far, and there will be struggles, and we are seeing that. Compare to 2008, Rodgers was throwing to an established Donald Driver, Greg Jennings and James Jones and Donald Lee. It will take more time to have an accurate picture of what we have in Jordan Love.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 23:38I would agree if he’s a rookie. This is year 4.APB wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 23:13You absolutely love to say it. Exhaustively so.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 22:55I hate to say I was right but…
Actually I do like to say it because this is the second time I’ve said while the team was enjoying a ton of success in terms of record but it was clear to see what was happening if anyone did any type of research what so ever.
Absolute &%$@ show at GM right now and in extension the president who hired both GM and coach.
But, in my mind, it’s still premature to be making an absolute judgment. Yeah, he sucked against LV, an opponent this offense should have been able to score on, and he hasn’t been “good” outside of week one (and a half of play against NO) but there are reasons to be patient in judgment.
He’s shown, at times, pocket presence and good decision making. He needs consistency, though.
He’s shown command of the offense. I’m not convinced a good number of the errors we’re seeing are his fault, at least not entirely. If he’s throwing to a spot with the expectation of the receiver being there - and then he’s not- that’s not on Love. We, as fans, can never know for certain in those instances, but I’m sure it’s happening.
He’s also got the physical tools. That, I don’t think, is questioned.
Anyway, several reasons to not be throwing in the towel on the guy. That is, unless you’ve just got an axe to grind over and over and over…
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5332
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Nah. Not buying it. He’s not basically a rookie. Those first 3 years count against the cap. Now he’s being paid like a big boy. Play like it.Pugger wrote: ↑10 Oct 2023 00:11But he is basically a rookie. Yes, he sat behind AR for 3 years but you don't learn how to be an NFL QB holding a clip board. AR sat behind Favre for 3 years. In Rodgers' first season, the Packers were 6-10, and he had some stinkers. This is still Love's 6th start. He has only thrown 215 passes in his career. Add to that, our pass catchers have something like 40 combined games played so far, and there will be struggles, and we are seeing that. Compare to 2008, Rodgers was throwing to an established Donald Driver, Greg Jennings and James Jones and Donald Lee. It will take more time to have an accurate picture of what we have in Jordan Love.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 23:38I would agree if he’s a rookie. This is year 4.APB wrote: ↑09 Oct 2023 23:13
You absolutely love to say it. Exhaustively so.
But, in my mind, it’s still premature to be making an absolute judgment. Yeah, he sucked against LV, an opponent this offense should have been able to score on, and he hasn’t been “good” outside of week one (and a half of play against NO) but there are reasons to be patient in judgment.
He’s shown, at times, pocket presence and good decision making. He needs consistency, though.
He’s shown command of the offense. I’m not convinced a good number of the errors we’re seeing are his fault, at least not entirely. If he’s throwing to a spot with the expectation of the receiver being there - and then he’s not- that’s not on Love. We, as fans, can never know for certain in those instances, but I’m sure it’s happening.
He’s also got the physical tools. That, I don’t think, is questioned.
Anyway, several reasons to not be throwing in the towel on the guy. That is, unless you’ve just got an axe to grind over and over and over…
Rodgers went 6-10 but he played well. Nothing about Love looks good. His best plays so far have been the times he has run the ball or gotten DPI calls. Minus a few exceptional catches by his WRs he has looked like absolute garbage.
Honestly. Ask yourself objectively. If the Packers were in Bears colors would you know the difference between Love and Cutler or Turd Biscuit?
We want to talk &%$@ in Fields all day long but Love looks significantly worse.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
We also have the easiest schedule overall.