Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2023
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
I have read several tweets claiming the Packers are looking to be BUYERS in the trade market, actively seeking a vet RB and/or a vet WR.
I swear, if this FO throws away meaningful assets on a junk trade in the middle of a lost youth experience building season, I may lose it.
...unless it's Davante Adams. I could live with that.
I swear, if this FO throws away meaningful assets on a junk trade in the middle of a lost youth experience building season, I may lose it.
...unless it's Davante Adams. I could live with that.
I was typing out a message of agreement, but then I thought that, while we should just take our lumps this season, it wouldn't be a bad idea to lock down a RB or WR who will be viable for the next 5 years or so (to the extent RBs can be viable that long ofc). We are lacking a superstar WR and with every game, Watson is making me doubt him more and more. Aaron Jones is obviously great, and frankly I wouldn't mind continuing to resign him as long as he is good. But we really need 3 NFL-caliber RBs ideally and we only have 1. Would rather just draft like 3 fast RBs in the later rounds of the 2024 draft (because that seems to be how to get good RBs), but depending on who is available I would possibly make a trade.APB wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023 18:42I have read several tweets claiming the Packers are looking to be BUYERS in the trade market, actively seeking a vet RB and/or a vet WR.
I swear, if this FO throws away meaningful assets on a junk trade in the middle of a lost youth experience building season, I may lose it.
...unless it's Davante Adams. I could live with that.
I don't think it would be smart for the Packers to be buyers at the deadline, especially not when talking about acquiring a running back.APB wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023 18:42I have read several tweets claiming the Packers are looking to be BUYERS in the trade market, actively seeking a vet RB and/or a vet WR.
I swear, if this FO throws away meaningful assets on a junk trade in the middle of a lost youth experience building season, I may lose it.
...unless it's Davante Adams. I could live with that.
I assume they'll be extending him. A team like the Bears don't give up a 2nd for half a year.
RIP JustJeff
With the Davante talk heating up, it sounds like he asked for a trade thsi month and the Raiders said no. Makes sense, they've have over $30M in dead cap if they got rid of him. He's stuck on the Raiders for another year unless someone is willing to give up major picks for him.
RIP JustJeff
Why not? They got even less out of Claypool!
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
190 yards I believe I read! I hope they screw this up again.
RIP JustJeff
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I actually really like that move for the Bears. Theyre building a foundation and banking on the Panthers to continue to suck so they can still get a QB.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
RIP JustJeff
Holy crap, Chase Young to the 49ers.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 23:14
Quick someone offer the commies a 5th for Terry McLaurin
the niners are never satisfied. They want a title
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Bears trade for Sweat already looking bad. Good player, but they spent a lot more to get a lesser & older player from the Commanders.
RIP JustJeff
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Can’t really say I do.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑31 Oct 2023 11:53I actually really like that move for the Bears. Theyre building a foundation and banking on the Panthers to continue to suck so they can still get a QB.
Decent pass rushers are valuable, but there always appears to be plenty available in FA at his level.
Might as well get one for free if you gotta pay fair market value for him either way.