Group Mock Draft
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Honestly I think we’re doing great at this. Realistic without being generic to the standard predictions
@BF004 is back up
@BF004 is back up
Tough board for the Packers. I think fairly realistic, though, as YoHo said. I am coming around to Chop late in the process here. I think he'd be my pick if no trade back presents itself. I think that speed, finesse rusher is something that every time needs in today's NFL even if he is not a high volume snap player. You need a full stable of EDGE guys these days.
Read More. Post Less.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13861
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I also think a type Gute has gone out of his way to not have on this team. Frankly don’t see that changing. He likes the big long, go through you, types, over the run around you types.NCF wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 10:41Tough board for the Packers. I think fairly realistic, though, as YoHo said. I am coming around to Chop late in the process here. I think he'd be my pick if no trade back presents itself. I think that speed, finesse rusher is something that every time needs in today's NFL even if he is not a high volume snap player. You need a full stable of EDGE guys these days.
My thought process is that Hafley will use a stable of rushers with different skill sets better than the static preferences of Pettine and Barry. Not only does Chop have that different skill set, he has it to the extreme. This is like the Math Rushers wet dream.BF004 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 10:55I also think a type Gute has gone out of his way to not have on this team. Frankly don’t see that changing. He likes the big long, go through you, types, over the run around you types.NCF wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 10:41Tough board for the Packers. I think fairly realistic, though, as YoHo said. I am coming around to Chop late in the process here. I think he'd be my pick if no trade back presents itself. I think that speed, finesse rusher is something that every time needs in today's NFL even if he is not a high volume snap player. You need a full stable of EDGE guys these days.
Read More. Post Less.
Yeah, I am not against Morgan, but I do think he is more suited for OG, so would prefer not spending #25 on him. Here is the CHTV write-up:
Read More. Post Less.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13861
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
A probable week 1 starter at RG with potential long term tackle upside? I'm all in on that for 25.
Guards are extremely valuable, their money isn't far off of tackle, and probably even exceeds that of RT at the top of the market. They make about the same as CB's at the top. No one questions that value at pick 5 or 10, let alone 25.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I am STRUGGLING with this.
Jackson powers Johnson is appealing
KoolAid is appealing.
Both fill needs
Latu is BY FAR the best player on my personal board and plays a premium position. But is not an elite athlete
Jackson powers Johnson is appealing
KoolAid is appealing.
Both fill needs
Latu is BY FAR the best player on my personal board and plays a premium position. But is not an elite athlete
- Backthepack4ever
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
- Contact:
This one is pretty easy for me. I like chop but the better OTs bury him. Latu might not be as sexy but he will be a steady 8-10 sacks every year. A better Preston Smith imo. I'll take that safe pick
It's in the trade value calculator and I updated, again, anyway.
Read More. Post Less.
The neck injury scares me off. The Packers have had horrible luck in that department.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 12:28This one is pretty easy for me. I like chop but the better OTs bury him. Latu might not be as sexy but he will be a steady 8-10 sacks every year. A better Preston Smith imo. I'll take that safe pick
Read More. Post Less.
If I am taking an OG at 25, I want an OG. Not an OT to OG convert project. I know we need a lot of depth, so I wouldn't hate the pick, but my eyes are still wandering elsewhere knowing we can still get a lot of OL help later and do not have a glaring starter need.BF004 wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 12:17A probable week 1 starter at RG with potential long term tackle upside? I'm all in on that for 25.
Guards are extremely valuable, their money isn't far off of tackle, and probably even exceeds that of RT at the top of the market. They make about the same as CB's at the top. No one questions that value at pick 5 or 10, let alone 25.
Read More. Post Less.
- Backthepack4ever
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
- Contact:
That is a great point. At one time it was thought he was done.NCF wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 13:12The neck injury scares me off. The Packers have had horrible luck in that department.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 12:28This one is pretty easy for me. I like chop but the better OTs bury him. Latu might not be as sexy but he will be a steady 8-10 sacks every year. A better Preston Smith imo. I'll take that safe pick
At 25 I think I still take the chance. Idk. Can't go wrong with a few dudes here
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I went with premium position of bigger need—Kool-Aid
Was set on Latu until the neck injury conversation reminded me of our spinal traumas
I get the vibe the league is going to be a little less high on JPJ than the media has been.
Was set on Latu until the neck injury conversation reminded me of our spinal traumas
I get the vibe the league is going to be a little less high on JPJ than the media has been.
Don't love it, don't hate it. That's how I typically feel when the Packers pick, so this feels right on par. The upside is there.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 14:15I went with premium position of bigger need—Kool-Aid
Was set on Latu until the neck injury conversation reminded me of our spinal traumas
I get the vibe the league is going to be a little less high on JPJ than the media has been.
Read More. Post Less.