LombardiTime wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 09:25
NCF wrote: ↑21 Oct 2024 18:22
This Kansas City team just keeps finding ways to win, but they are really starting to put out some Green Bay 2011 vibes.
The offense of the 2024 (6-0) Chiefs, after losing their top WR and other offensive contributors like RB Pacheco, does sort of remind one of the (15-1) 2011 Packer defense, which lost Nick Collins and was not very good overall.
Of course once key difference between the 2011 Pack and the 2024 Chief teams is that KC has a GM who is not opposed to looking outside the team's own building to add talent to his roster such as Kareem Hunt and now it looks like DeAndre Hopkins. Would not shock me if KC added another piece before the trade deadline.
Don't know that adding these veterans in hopes of winning their third straight Super Bowl victory will work for KC, but I do admire their GM for not just always standing pat.
I think we'd all agree that Ted didn't like the UFA market, were value seldom equals cost.
our problems imho was mostly one dimensional offense, neither of Grant or Starks popped 600 yards, Rodger swa our 3rd leading rusher, which means defenses only had to worry about our passing, even so it took till almost the end of the season till KC decided to just play prevent with deep shell coverage, we basically lacked a short passing scheme because of our dominance throwing deep.
on Defense, our coverage was weaker with the loss of Collins, Peprah though recorded 10 PD's, Williams 22 PD's, Morgan took Collins FS position most of the season and recorded 11 PD's, Woodson 17 PD's NCB Shields 12 PD's, all did there fair share of tackling too, thing is we only had 29 sacks, and I'd bet the pressure totals were also low, heck even the great Collins couldn't help support that lousy pass rush.
and DL and pass rushers are scarce as frogs hair on the FA market, doubt there was any way for Ted to fix the issues we had, maybe a bonafide bell cow RB?