Brian Gutekunst says the Packers need to 'ramp up our sense of urgency'

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14269
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

LombardiTime wrote:
18 Mar 2025 15:41
I would think that if Gutekunst believed he needed to exhibit a sense of urgency as General Manager then the Packers would not currently trail all 31 other NFL teams when it comes adding external talent to their roster,
Well now that is just intentionally being dense, looking for evidence to support your conclusion.

Packers were 9th in total money spent, 7th in first year cash given out.

So right about the top quarter of the league.


We just really didn't need 5 or 6 free agents with the draft yet to come to be honest.
Image

Image

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14269
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Make that 3, mike drop

Image

Image

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 15465
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

BF004 wrote:
18 Mar 2025 16:19
LombardiTime wrote:
18 Mar 2025 15:41
I would think that if Gutekunst believed he needed to exhibit a sense of urgency as General Manager then the Packers would not currently trail all 31 other NFL teams when it comes adding external talent to their roster,
Well now that is just intentionally being dense, looking for evidence to support your conclusion.

Packers were 9th in total money spent, 7th in first year cash given out.

So right about the top quarter of the league.


We just really didn't need 5 or 6 free agents with the draft yet to come to be honest.
That's what this entire thread has been driving toward, "Gutekunst wants everyone else to be urgent, but he does want to be urgent." Never mind the that we never got a good explanation of what urgency by the GM would look like in our situation. We just signed one of the top FA CBs, filling a hole in the roster. We just signed one of the top FA interior offensive lineman, filling a hole in the roster. It would have been nice to get a WR or an edge, but they went for crazy cash. Bad GMs make a move, just to make a move.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 15465
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

BF004 wrote:
18 Mar 2025 18:47
Make that 3, mike drop

There's another hole filled!... that's what she said!

A speedy WR and return man.

Now tied with Ravens and Bengals for least!
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 9138
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

I mean, this whole exercise of tallying "total number of outside talent brought in" as a measuring stick for urgency is kinda silly.

Did the roster improve with the FA additions acquired in relation to the subtractions? I'd say yes. Whether it qualifies in some subjective measure of "urgency" for...whomever... doesn't even remotely concern me.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5792
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

APB wrote:
18 Mar 2025 19:23
I mean, this whole exercise of tallying "total number of outside talent brought in" as a measuring stick for urgency is kinda silly.

Did the roster improve with the FA additions acquired in relation to the subtractions? I'd say yes. Whether it qualifies in some subjective measure of "urgency" for...whomever... doesn't even remotely concern me.
If you keep Jaire then sure. If you drop Jaire this team went from good to good and really didnt improve at all. Myers was so bad that any improvement is a positive. Banks is just an average guard so you went from bad player to fine. Hobbs is a downgrade from Alexander any way you slice it. Even from availability, it's a horizontal move. If healthy you went from a really player to a pretty good player.

The draft could improve the team but every team around the NFL gets a draft.

What is really concerning is the Bears got significantly better. I know they win the offseason every year but this one feels a bit different plus the coaching changes. The Lions were already significantly better than us and made their additions. The Vikings kept around a lot of their players and made some moves. We are in the most competitive division in football and added an average guard and an often injured pretty good CB to replace a better player. I dont see the urgency. I see status quo.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
Papa John
Reactions:
Posts: 615
Joined: 22 Sep 2023 11:03

Post by Papa John »

lupedafiasco wrote:
18 Mar 2025 19:52
APB wrote:
18 Mar 2025 19:23
I mean, this whole exercise of tallying "total number of outside talent brought in" as a measuring stick for urgency is kinda silly.

Did the roster improve with the FA additions acquired in relation to the subtractions? I'd say yes. Whether it qualifies in some subjective measure of "urgency" for...whomever... doesn't even remotely concern me.
If you keep Jaire then sure. If you drop Jaire this team went from good to good and really didnt improve at all. Myers was so bad that any improvement is a positive. Banks is just an average guard so you went from bad player to fine. Hobbs is a downgrade from Alexander any way you slice it. Even from availability, it's a horizontal move. If healthy you went from a really player to a pretty good player.

The draft could improve the team but every team around the NFL gets a draft.

What is really concerning is the Bears got significantly better. I know they win the offseason every year but this one feels a bit different plus the coaching changes. The Lions were already significantly better than us and made their additions. The Vikings kept around a lot of their players and made some moves. We are in the most competitive division in football and added an average guard and an often injured pretty good CB to replace a better player. I dont see the urgency. I see status quo.
I could see this season going any possible way. I could reasonably see us winning the division. I could also see us finishing dead last. First time in a long time I’ve thought that going into a season.
Cowboy up.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5792
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

I just keep thinking we are a blocked FG away from going 0-6 in the division. That’s not a team trending in the right direction. I think they’re a fine team but they aren’t doing a good job keeping up with the division and ultimately that’s what helps you get into the playoffs. It’s rare to face both the worst AFC and NFC division in the same season like we did last year.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13003
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

hardly anything ever stays the same, last year we saw improvement in defense and the running of Jacobs, and a decline with LOve and the receivers, brought about mostly because of Love getting hurt early, and receivers dropping passes, I don't expect that to be the same this season, same with pass rush, we concentrated and focused on stopping the run and did so, but it came at the expense of getting to the QB, there should be a happy medium, and I expect our coaches will get that right.

the difference between us and the rest of this division is minuscule, it's the passing and getting after the QB IMO, and it's fixable, and probably with our existing players, and a couple hits in the draft.

the Vikes and Detroit just finished the best season either team has had in 30 years, not sure they repeat that, teams rarely do, we have been the exception as much or more than every other team, Chicago is on the right path, but their no were near the finish line, I know I'am optimistic here, but if we can fix those two issues we can dance with anyone

Post Reply