Green Bay Packers @ Tampa Bay Buccaneers GDT - 10/18/2020 - 4:25 EST
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Yeah honestly Jackson’s career depends on this week. If he bombs he’s not likely to stay with the team next year. 3 years in you need to be competent at your job.
I could see a pure zone scheme giving him a shot in a cover 3. I think he’s got a better shot at succeeding there but if he doesn’t he’s gonna be out of the league.
No way this medical staff give King a shot to play.
I could see a pure zone scheme giving him a shot in a cover 3. I think he’s got a better shot at succeeding there but if he doesn’t he’s gonna be out of the league.
No way this medical staff give King a shot to play.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
We still play a lot of zone in 2020 anyways.
I like our approach of making sure players are healthy. Especially early in the season. It makes sense to keep King out a week or 2 it means no further agitation. I even think Gary should be considered more rest too.
The benefit with Jackson is the TB WRs are bigger which is a better matchup for Jackson. But this TB WR group is really good. Their passing offense was number 1 in the league last year in terms of yards.
I like our approach of making sure players are healthy. Especially early in the season. It makes sense to keep King out a week or 2 it means no further agitation. I even think Gary should be considered more rest too.
The benefit with Jackson is the TB WRs are bigger which is a better matchup for Jackson. But this TB WR group is really good. Their passing offense was number 1 in the league last year in terms of yards.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Yeah we play a lot of zone but we mix it up quite a bit as well. The perfect scheme I think for Jackson would have been a Tampa 2 I think but that scheme is dead with how soft the league is on hitting receivers.go pak go wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020 11:12We still play a lot of zone in 2020 anyways.
I like our approach of making sure players are healthy. Especially early in the season. It makes sense to keep King out a week or 2 it means no further agitation. I even think Gary should be considered more rest too.
The benefit with Jackson is the TB WRs are bigger which is a better matchup for Jackson. But this TB WR group is really good. Their passing offense was number 1 in the league last year in terms of yards.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
I mean we were about 65% to 70% zone in 2019 which is more than league average. We also played better while in zone but that may be skewed because man defense usually allows more over the top plays.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020 11:37Yeah we play a lot of zone but we mix it up quite a bit as well. The perfect scheme I think for Jackson would have been a Tampa 2 I think but that scheme is dead with how soft the league is on hitting receivers.go pak go wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020 11:12We still play a lot of zone in 2020 anyways.
I like our approach of making sure players are healthy. Especially early in the season. It makes sense to keep King out a week or 2 it means no further agitation. I even think Gary should be considered more rest too.
The benefit with Jackson is the TB WRs are bigger which is a better matchup for Jackson. But this TB WR group is really good. Their passing offense was number 1 in the league last year in terms of yards.
This is an interesting article that talks about how King is really good in man but Alexander is really good in zone.
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/by-t ... n-sullivanThe Green Bay Packers’ defense wasn’t bad last year, which is a nice change. What’s not a nice change is just how much it looked like a Dom Capers defense in that they really focused on pass defense while suffering mightily on run defense, and that lack of run-stopping eventually cost the team in the playoffs. Green Bay was also extremely dependent on interceptions to get stops, which is a dangerous place to be in the modern NFL.
While they were a pretty good defense, they also never seemed to add up to the sum of their parts. By DVOA, they were 9th against the pass and 23rd against the run, good for 15th overall. That’s fine, but between the Smiths and Kenny Clark, they presented one of the most fearsome pass rushes in the league. Jaire Alexander looks to be outstanding, and the safety position is stronger than it’s been in years. They did have some obvious problems like Dean Lowry’s regression and poor play from the inside linebacker position, but they also suffered from a serious, but subtle problem highlighted in the just released Football Outsider 2020 almanac. Namely:
The Packers defense struggled when blitzing last season, allowing 7.8 net yards per pass with 30.2% DVOA. Possibly connected: The Packers had the NFL’s biggest gap between defense in man coverage (8.9 yards per pass, 40.1% DVOA) and zone coverage (6.8 yards per pass, 6.2% DVOA).
(Please note that higher DVOAs are bad for defenses.)
Most teams play a mix of zone and man, and most teams are better in one than the other, but it’s rare for a team to be so good in one and so poor in another. The chief reason for this is the divergent skillsets of Kevin King and Jaire Alexander. King consistently rates as one of the best man corners in the NFL by many metrics. Doug Farrar, writing at Touchdown Wire, recently ranked him 11th, and wrote:
At 6’3″ and 200 pounds, King is one of the better new wave of big, physical press conerbacks developing right now. Aggressive to a fault off the line of scrimmage (and occasionally too grabby), King makes quick slants and drag routes very difficult for opposing receivers, because he has the size, physicality, and short-area quickness to erase those concepts.
King also excels in the Red Zone, which, combined with his man prowess, makes him pretty valuable. But King is also a weird player, and he struggles mightily in zone. That’s a problem because Jaire Alexander excels in zone and, more importantly, because the Packers played 68% of their snaps in zone last season (15th in the league, smack dab in the middle).
Alexander was ranked 6th among zone corners by Farrar, which does square with his tape. I suspect Alexander will one day excel in man as well, but for now, he does still get himself beaten too often.
Alexander is an excellent fit for Pettine’s defense, and it would be nice to pair him with a better complement. While you may think that diversity among the corners would allow for the team to remain flexible on defense, it instead creates holes regardless of what style they play.
King’s flaws were especially problematic. He was one of the worst zone defenders in the league, making him an easy target in the Packers’ otherwise formidable zone. King was also a poor tackler against pass-catchers (he was oddly good against running backs), allowing 4.9 YAC per reception, 12th-worst in the league. His adjusted yards allowed, according to Football Outsiders, ranked 77th in the league. All of that said, King’s red zone play and physical presence against larger receivers was extremely valuable in and of itself.
Ideally, the team would specialize in either zone or man, and fall into the other to create confusion. The Packers lean zone, but no more than an average team. Given that they excel in it, it would be nice if both starting corners also specialized in it.
The Blitz
Let’s revisit the Packers’ “possibly related” issues with blitzing. When Green Bay brought 5 or 6 rushers they were atrocious. Thank goodness for the Smiths. When you blitz, you always expose your secondary. If you’re in man, you usually have one fewer safety in the back end, and if the rushers don’t get home, you get burned. If the team stays in zone, it’s common to have a resulting mismatch that can be exploited. With Kevin King struggling in zone, having to cover more space with no protection behind him, he got burned. A lot.
This was compounded by would-be Packer blitzers being kind of bad at it. Here’s a list of Packers defensive backs with a sack last year:
Adrian Amos (1)
Kevin King (1)
That’s not good. It’s actually kind of amazing. The good news is the Packers don’t really need to blitz very much with the quality of their pass rush, but it does remove some flexibility from the playbook. The more you can’t do, the easier it is to plan for what you can do.
I have grown to like Kevin King, but I like Alexander more and I like my defenses to make sense. If you cloned Alexander everything would work so much better. To be fair, if you cloned King everything may also work so much better, but this team plays zone a majority of the time. King would probably fit in best as some kind of weird red zone nickel, but he’d fit in better on another team, like the Lions, who played man more than any other team in football.
I wonder if we might see Chandon Sullivan start to cut into King’s time next year. He was fantastic in a small sample last season, and I think he also just fits into the scheme better. King is a free agent after this season, and if there is a season, don’t be surprised if he’s involved in a surprise trade. He has value, nice counting stats, and would fit nicely elsewhere.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
That's a fascinating write-up! Thanks for bringing it.
I would be really interested to look more at that throughout this year to see if it's holding up. I might even pay for FootballOutsiders+ just to see it, if that's updated throughout the year....
But it does bring to mind the question of solutions... Does this mean it makes sense to let King go, knowing that if he goes to a primarily man coverage team he may quickly become among the league's top CBs and feeling like we let one get away? And that we should find a CB with the feel and instincts to play better zone coverage and hope that Jaire's athletic talents and those of the hypothetical draft pick make up the difference in man situations moving forward?
That's definitely going to impact the type of player I scout in draft stuff, and also the way I watch and pay attention to Packers games this year.
I would be really interested to look more at that throughout this year to see if it's holding up. I might even pay for FootballOutsiders+ just to see it, if that's updated throughout the year....
But it does bring to mind the question of solutions... Does this mean it makes sense to let King go, knowing that if he goes to a primarily man coverage team he may quickly become among the league's top CBs and feeling like we let one get away? And that we should find a CB with the feel and instincts to play better zone coverage and hope that Jaire's athletic talents and those of the hypothetical draft pick make up the difference in man situations moving forward?
That's definitely going to impact the type of player I scout in draft stuff, and also the way I watch and pay attention to Packers games this year.
.
The Packers 3rd Road Trip of the season is about to commence
Team on board and wheels up at 1:12 pm LFT. En route to pillage the pirates and take their lunch money
Packers are 2-0 on the road already, hopefully they'll keep it rolling on Sunday afternoon
So far MLF has done a fantastic job of designing an offense around who he has available - it will be interesting to see who takes the jet sweep role with Swervin' Ervin sidelined.
.
The Packers 3rd Road Trip of the season is about to commence
Team on board and wheels up at 1:12 pm LFT. En route to pillage the pirates and take their lunch money
Packers are 2-0 on the road already, hopefully they'll keep it rolling on Sunday afternoon
So far MLF has done a fantastic job of designing an offense around who he has available - it will be interesting to see who takes the jet sweep role with Swervin' Ervin sidelined.
.
IT. IS. TIME
Read More. Post Less.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Cancelled by the forum elites.
He's a hands catcher and he is fast. He offers this team a lot. We have a true slot again.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑17 Oct 2020 16:26Once he gets his chance to start he’s not gonna give up that spot.
Game day rules allow 48 active players on Sunday IF 8 of them are OL. But right now, GB only has 7 OL on the 53 man roster
So what did they do vs ATL ? Not exactly sure how it works if you don't have 8 OL. Do you get 46 or 47 ?
Bakh
Wagner
Nijman
Turner
Jenkins
Patrick
Runyan
https://www.packers.com/team/players-roster/
HAHAHA ! I forgot Linsley ! What a dork- nevermind
So what did they do vs ATL ? Not exactly sure how it works if you don't have 8 OL. Do you get 46 or 47 ?
Bakh
Wagner
Nijman
Turner
Jenkins
Patrick
Runyan
https://www.packers.com/team/players-roster/
HAHAHA ! I forgot Linsley ! What a dork- nevermind
IT. IS. TIME
lol, where's YOOP?
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14473
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
I really hope you guys are right about EQ.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
I don't think he will light the world on fire. Never really did except for one game vs the Jets.
But he is a good complimentary piece and MLF is really, really good with complimentary pieces.
I view EQ as just a very athletic Geronimo Allison who is better at catching the ball. It's really good to have him back.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I view him more as a bigger Donald Driver. Hope I'm right!
As I expected, the Packers are wearing green today in the hot sun.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I've always viewed him more as Jordy Nelson--bigger, build-up speed WR with good hands--but like that years 3/4 Jordy where we don't know which direction he'll go between being a long-time reliable #3 possession WR or actually starting to pop more consistently and taking that next step into being a real starting WR.Cdragon wrote: ↑18 Oct 2020 12:38I view him more as a bigger Donald Driver. Hope I'm right!
I, too, hope I'm right.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I’m excited about some of the tangibles he brings, blocking, big slot work.
I don’t have big expectations thought for him as a WR, i.e., beating a competent CB on the outside.
I wonder how having Swerve out will impact the effectiveness of that jet sweep motion. I hope Williams and Jones both split out a lot and hope they both do a lot of jet motion; maybe even getting a carry each as well.
I don’t have big expectations thought for him as a WR, i.e., beating a competent CB on the outside.
I wonder how having Swerve out will impact the effectiveness of that jet sweep motion. I hope Williams and Jones both split out a lot and hope they both do a lot of jet motion; maybe even getting a carry each as well.
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
I view EQ as the #3 WR. Not as good as Adams and Lazard but better than MVS. But he is a standard WR, not a slot WR. The Packers don't need a slot receiver, they already have Tonyan and Sternberger.