Duh Bares Vs. The Packers

[go pak go]

Is the word on Savage that he was basically cramping?

It didn't look serious when I saw him go down but I believe Is saw Redmond the entire rest of the game.

Savage is really starting to come out of his shell. Really don't want to see that stopped.

I also will not understand the angst for our offensive weapons. Lazard showed last night he is ready. We have some really good depth and offensive playmakers that we can hopefully gel the final month of the season and into the playoffs.

The only real negative drive I saw last night from the offense was the 1st and 2nd down after the Robert Tonyan hold.

[lulu]

Love how some people in the media blame the Hicks injury for how we ran the ball but don't say anything about Bruckner missing the game for the Colts and having Henry go off on them.

Or how we had to switch linemen around last night because of injuries. You gotta love that nobody noticed, however.

Tony Dungy would have said that Packers O-line played so well because Hicks wasn't in...

[lulu]

I expected a win last night but would have thought the Bears defense would have given us more trouble. When this offense is on, it's really fun to watch. The problem has always been consistency.

[salmar80]

It's really tough to log in after a blowout win against a division rival in a week when some of our top conference competition lost and we gained ground and see that there are still people talking about who we should fire and where we failed.

I literally don't even log in here after a loss because it's so bad; but coming in Monday morning after a 41-25 Bears week blowout and seeing multiple threads sidetracked by a couple individual's complaints is disheartening.

We made a quality Bears D look like high schoolers and capitalized on turnover opportunities on the D. I'm happy as a clam.

There's a Finnish saying "hunger grows while you're eating", meaning success breeds ever-higher (and often silly) expectations. I think folks want an utterly dominant performance to convince them we are a potential SB winning team, as if such a performance mattered at all in the playoffs. Bad news: There will never be a team so good I'd feel completely safe in the playoffs.

[YoHoChecko]

I expected a win last night but would have thought the Bears defense would have given us more trouble. When this offense is on, it's really fun to watch. The problem has always been consistency.

I mean, the team has played multiple games without its best players--LT David Bakhtiari, RB Aaron Jones, WR Davante Adams, WR2 Allen Lazard. They're in and out of the lineup--the guys we thought we literally couldn't survive without.

Of COURSE there's inconsistency. Once they all got back together against the Colts I was hopeful it's flip a switch and be back to normal; they were good but not all the way there last week. This week, they were all the way there. This is how we started the season, and health allowing, should be how we end it, too.

[Yoop]

I expected a win last night but would have thought the Bears defense would have given us more trouble. When this offense is on, it's really fun to watch. The problem has always been consistency.

I mean, the team has played multiple games without its best players--LT David Bakhtiari, RB Aaron Jones, WR Davante Adams, WR2 Allen Lazard. They're in and out of the lineup--the guys we thought we literally couldn't survive without.

Of COURSE there's inconsistency. Once they all got back together against the Colts I was hopeful it's flip a switch and be back to normal; they were good but not all the way there last week. This week, they were all the way there. This is how we started the season, and health allowing, should be how we end it, too.

well put.
I think that to a degree can be said about the defense as well, we have trouble with zone communication, all 3 ILB's have missed time to injury and are first year players in the schemes, people complain about Pettine, I know I tend to agree in some respects (soft zones/ to complicated ) but minus a off season and players new or not healthy enough to practice enough and it's hard to expect to much more.

imo so much about this offense depends on the success of play action, and you have to be able to sell the run for that to work well, and it did last night.

[BF004]

It's definitely a little hard to complain about consistency on offense.


I mean if Seattle scores 31 points or less tonight, we have the #1 scoring offense in the NFL.


Sure we could be better here and there, but then there are 31 other teams saying the same thing about themselves. We literally are the best offense in the NFL.

[Yoop]

It's definitely a little hard to complain about consistency on offense.


I mean if Seattle scores 31 points or less tonight, we have the #1 scoring offense in the NFL.


Sure we could be better here and there, but then there are 31 other teams saying the same thing about themselves. We literally are the best offense in the NFL.

mostly because our defense &%$@ the bed

as that article I brought or you may have read elsewhere, we are to dependent on situational play and we have to platoon depending on run or pass more then we should, we don't have a grouping that works well enough against both P and R, so Pettine would rather use Green and Kirksey in his base package opting for better coverage, hardly blame him, but better running teams love to see it.

we should invest in a better ILB, WR also

[Bogey]

500 fans to be in attendance — Packers full time employees and families. I’ll be working for the first time this season keeping those rowdy Packers employers in line.

For the love of all thats good, please make sure they stay seated.

As you can see, they were exceedingly well-behaved, except for one or two standing troublemakers. The actual attendance was about 280 employees and families. With the players, coaches, trainers, equipment managers, security detail, maintenance workers, ushers and about 50 of us in Guest Services, we definitely had the fans outnumbered and under control. If you look closely, you'll note that at the bottom of each stairway there is a yellow-vested security person making sure those 280 fans don't rush the field.

Pack vs Bears.jpg (402.58 KiB) Viewed 467 times

[Trudge]

500 fans to be in attendance — Packers full time employees and families. I’ll be working for the first time this season keeping those rowdy Packers employers in line.

For the love of all thats good, please make sure they stay seated.

As you can see, they were exceedingly well-behaved, except for one or two standing troublemakers. The actual attendance was about 280 employees and families. With the players, coaches, trainers, equipment managers, security detail, maintenance workers, ushers and about 50 of us in Guest Services, we definitely had the fans outnumbered and under control. If you look closely, you'll note that at the bottom of each stairway there is a yellow-vested security person making sure those 280 fans don't rush the field.
Pack vs Bears.jpg

Appreciate all that you do Bogey. Glad to here that they weren't too much trouble.

[BF004]

500 fans to be in attendance — Packers full time employees and families. I’ll be working for the first time this season keeping those rowdy Packers employers in line.

For the love of all thats good, please make sure they stay seated.

As you can see, they were exceedingly well-behaved, except for one or two standing troublemakers. The actual attendance was about 280 employees and families. With the players, coaches, trainers, equipment managers, security detail, maintenance workers, ushers and about 50 of us in Guest Services, we definitely had the fans outnumbered and under control. If you look closely, you'll note that at the bottom of each stairway there is a yellow-vested security person making sure those 280 fans don't rush the field.
Pack vs Bears.jpg

So if I claim to be your son, you can get me in next Sunday??

[Bogey]

For the love of all thats good, please make sure they stay seated.

As you can see, they were exceedingly well-behaved, except for one or two standing troublemakers. The actual attendance was about 280 employees and families. With the players, coaches, trainers, equipment managers, security detail, maintenance workers, ushers and about 50 of us in Guest Services, we definitely had the fans outnumbered and under control. If you look closely, you'll note that at the bottom of each stairway there is a yellow-vested security person making sure those 280 fans don't rush the field.
Pack vs Bears.jpg

So if I claim to be your son, you can get me in next Sunday??

That would probably get you permanently banned, BF. My real-life relatives have to pretend they don't know me.

[BF004]

Well I thought it was workers and families, lol.

Feel free to use that pm feature if you ever find a way in this year.

[Bogey]

Well I thought it was workers and families, lol.

Feel free to use that pm feature if you ever find a way in this year.

Will do, BF, but I would never qualify for the game attendance benefit. That's only for full-time employees and their families. I'm part-time seasonal. But it looks like I will be able to work the rest of the games this season, since it seems the Packers are now ready to have limited attendance (last night was a test run) and I'm on the short list of seasonal employees authorized to work on game days.

[go pak go]

Well I thought it was workers and families, lol.

Feel free to use that pm feature if you ever find a way in this year.

Will do, BF, but I would never qualify for the game attendance benefit. That's only for full-time employees and their families. I'm part-time seasonal. But it looks like I will be able to work the rest of the games this season, since it seems the Packers are now ready to have limited attendance (last night was a test run) and I'm on the short list of seasonal employees authorized to work on game days.

How much of the game do you actually get to watch when you are working? Is it more when there is really no guests to take care of?

[Christo]

I don't care about this late stuff - preventive defense. But I worry about the start of the game where no preventive defense was playing. Our D! sucked against an offense with Trubi-dubi-doo. Look at the 1st half again, don't look at the stats or the outcome, look what happened. Any competent QB would have gotten 14 points on us. Pettine needs to go or MLF has to do some serious talk. We cannot waste such an opportunity: Godgers, Adams, Jones and no $%@# nemesis like the 49ers 2013 or from last year. We have a real shot and Pettine reenacts Dom Capers 2.0.

You mean the start of the game that saw a 57 yard run on a terrible personnel group and alignment, but outside that gave up 32 yards on 3 drives and 3 points. Along with an INT and a scoop and score.

I agree that Pettine needs to go and that 57 yard run is almost all on him, but one can not seriously say that the defense sucked at the start of the game.

I just watch the 49ers defense and all I want is someone like Robert Saleh.

I just really hope MLF can find someone like that. This team is good enough to sneak into the SB this year because the conference is down overall. I don't think we hang very well against the AFC top two teams; however, we have the playmakers on defense and a great performance from Rodgers and Jones could do it.

We have a serious shot at this thing. But moving forward, MLF needs to find a D Coordinator who gets more out of his talent. Not less which is what we are currently getting.

And it is so weird too because after watching 2018 and 2019 (for the exception of giving up big plays), we had a defense that I was very confident with.

I'm gonna throw a name out there that might be available after this season, Vic Fangio. It's possible Denver lets him go after another bad year for the Broncos. Not that Elway has done him any favors in getting him better offensive talent. Add in losing Von Miller for the entire year doesn't help.
But it's not out the realm of possibility that he's unemployed in the not too distant future.

[go pak go]

Sounds like Savage should be okay.

Corey Linsley has an MCL injury.

The Green Bay Packers are getting some good news on Monday morning on center Corey Linsley’s knee injury. According to NFL Network’s Mike Garafolo, Linsley’s injury is believed to be a sprained MCL, a relatively mild injury given the circumstances.

I would expect Linsley to be back perhaps as early as TEN or even earlier depending on the severity.

[bud fox]

I expected a win last night but would have thought the Bears defense would have given us more trouble. When this offense is on, it's really fun to watch. The problem has always been consistency.

I mean, the team has played multiple games without its best players--LT David Bakhtiari, RB Aaron Jones, WR Davante Adams, WR2 Allen Lazard. They're in and out of the lineup--the guys we thought we literally couldn't survive without.

Of COURSE there's inconsistency. Once they all got back together against the Colts I was hopeful it's flip a switch and be back to normal; they were good but not all the way there last week. This week, they were all the way there. This is how we started the season, and health allowing, should be how we end it, too.

That's what a HOF QB gives you ... Opportunity to win any week despite all other factors.

Another top game by Rodgers - 4 TDs 200 plus 132 QB rating

[lulu]

I expected a win last night but would have thought the Bears defense would have given us more trouble. When this offense is on, it's really fun to watch. The problem has always been consistency.

I mean, the team has played multiple games without its best players--LT David Bakhtiari, RB Aaron Jones, WR Davante Adams, WR2 Allen Lazard. They're in and out of the lineup--the guys we thought we literally couldn't survive without.

Of COURSE there's inconsistency. Once they all got back together against the Colts I was hopeful it's flip a switch and be back to normal; they were good but not all the way there last week. This week, they were all the way there. This is how we started the season, and health allowing, should be how we end it, too.

Thanks for agreeing there is inconsistency, I think?

Inconsistency is OK during the regular season. Inconsistency in the playoffs gets you a ticket home. The issues that I see with this team are between the ears, which is largely the responsibility of the coaching staff. We have the players it takes to get it done but we can ill afford to be our own worst enemy (lack of fire, poor fundamentals, sloppy play, turnovers, foolish penalties). As we saw in the Colts game, this was the deciding factor, in my opinion.

[Pugger]

I expected a win last night but would have thought the Bears defense would have given us more trouble. When this offense is on, it's really fun to watch. The problem has always been consistency.

I mean, the team has played multiple games without its best players--LT David Bakhtiari, RB Aaron Jones, WR Davante Adams, WR2 Allen Lazard. They're in and out of the lineup--the guys we thought we literally couldn't survive without.

Of COURSE there's inconsistency. Once they all got back together against the Colts I was hopeful it's flip a switch and be back to normal; they were good but not all the way there last week. This week, they were all the way there. This is how we started the season, and health allowing, should be how we end it, too.

If we hadn't turned the ball over all those times we win that game.