Agreed. So let's get it done the next 4 weeks. This is our best shot.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 11:08I think that should be the plan even if they DO bear fruit.
But we absolutely have to win one of the next three Super Bowls for me to feel content with this phase of the team (the early-MLF, late-Rodgers phase, we can call it. EMLR for short). I rarely put a standard that high, but we have a really great window right now.
General Packers News 2020
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
The best option is to try and trade Love for the best you can get and learn to never disrespect the God again.go pak go wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 11:02Yeah I don't think cap worries me too much. You can clear out a cap issue in one season. So if our dealings ends up with a Rodgers SB ring in 2020...I say go for it in 2021 and 2022 and then clean house and restart with Love if they don't bear any fruit.NCF wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 09:18Yep, as it stands. What this cannot show, though, is all the easy avenues teams have to access cap. Release players with high salary and little dead cap. Extend young stars with big cap numbers, etc. We know our own situation pretty well, but I wonder what some of these teams will have to do in order to break out of the red. I still think there is the potential for some sort of compromise that will avoid the massive cap shrinkage that is being projected.kyle.mccarroll wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 08:52Not pretty for GB either though - only like 5 teams in worse shape than us right now.
Only real players on offense I want to keep beyond 2022 is Jenkins, Dillon, Adams and Love. And Lazard too because I love the guy and his attitude.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
Let's let the god show he is a god here in January/February first.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 15:04The best option is to try and trade Love for the best you can get and learn to never disrespect the God again.go pak go wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 11:02Yeah I don't think cap worries me too much. You can clear out a cap issue in one season. So if our dealings ends up with a Rodgers SB ring in 2020...I say go for it in 2021 and 2022 and then clean house and restart with Love if they don't bear any fruit.NCF wrote: ↑11 Jan 2021 09:18
Yep, as it stands. What this cannot show, though, is all the easy avenues teams have to access cap. Release players with high salary and little dead cap. Extend young stars with big cap numbers, etc. We know our own situation pretty well, but I wonder what some of these teams will have to do in order to break out of the red. I still think there is the potential for some sort of compromise that will avoid the massive cap shrinkage that is being projected.
Only real players on offense I want to keep beyond 2022 is Jenkins, Dillon, Adams and Love. And Lazard too because I love the guy and his attitude.
Finally the Packers organization did something to let fans know they are alive. They teamed up with Charlie Berens. This is hilarious.
Wayne Larivee did a great job.
Wayne Larivee did a great job.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
I'm just mad we didn't spend the money to get that really good STs coach.
That was stupid. I understand player resources are limited and finite. But get the coach who is supposedly really good at this stuff.
That was stupid. I understand player resources are limited and finite. But get the coach who is supposedly really good at this stuff.
- TheGreenMan
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: 23 Mar 2020 07:01
- Location: Iowa
They both would. Kaufusi is a convert from DE. 6'6" 275 lbs.
Read More. Post Less.
Great little piece from Tonyan here. Worth the read.
https://www.theplayerstribune.com/posts ... r-football
https://www.theplayerstribune.com/posts ... r-football
RIP JustJeff
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Wow, that was one of the better one's I've seen. Was getting like goosebumps reading it.paco wrote: ↑14 Jan 2021 09:50Great little piece from Tonyan here. Worth the read.
https://www.theplayerstribune.com/posts ... r-football
And God, I love it when players 'get it'.
That big G, and everything it stands for? It’s unlike anything in all of sports. And that’s not me being disrespectful in any way to any other team. It’s just that Lambeau Field and the Green Bay Packers ... that’s NFL royalty right there. The frozen tundra, all those historic games, that yellow and green. It speaks for itself at this point.
We all know what this is about. We all get it.
This is what we all live for. It’s what we’re all here to do. Players, coaches, fans … all of us.
This is what it’s all about.
And it all starts right now. It’s gonna be one hell of a ride!
Go, Pack, Go!
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
4th NFCCG appearance in 7 years. Time to make this one count!
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
For the regular season this year, the Packers had
48 drives end in TD passes
46 drives end in punts
16 drives end in rushing TDs
16 drives end with a FG attempt (made all)
11 drives end with a turnover
8 drives end with a failed 4th down
This means that not only were there more passing TDs than punts.
But there were more scoring drives than non-scoring drives. 80 to 65.
And that excluding FGs, TD drives versus non-scoring drives were 64 to 65.
So we can add in the playoffs now.
4 TD drives
2 punts
2 FG drives
0 turnovers
0 4th down fails
TD drives: 69, non-scoring drive: 67
48 drives end in TD passes
46 drives end in punts
16 drives end in rushing TDs
16 drives end with a FG attempt (made all)
11 drives end with a turnover
8 drives end with a failed 4th down
This means that not only were there more passing TDs than punts.
But there were more scoring drives than non-scoring drives. 80 to 65.
And that excluding FGs, TD drives versus non-scoring drives were 64 to 65.
So we can add in the playoffs now.
4 TD drives
2 punts
2 FG drives
0 turnovers
0 4th down fails
TD drives: 69, non-scoring drive: 67
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4172
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Go Pack Go!