Rams @ Packers - NFCD Playoff GDT - 1/16 - 3:35 PM CST
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I thought the first one MVS had in the end zone was absolutely a drop. It was high but it was on the hands. Gotta make that one.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
I'm not concerned about whether or not they were drops. The point is that there were missed opportunities when Rodgers and his WRs had chances but didn't connect. We didn't play flawlessly on offense and we still dominated the #1 defense (albeit with a damaged Donald).
It's the plus side of today's negatives. They were there and we were good enough for them not to matter.
We're just a very good football team who could stand to replace the ST coach and who have some concentration drops in our receiving corps
It's the plus side of today's negatives. They were there and we were good enough for them not to matter.
We're just a very good football team who could stand to replace the ST coach and who have some concentration drops in our receiving corps
Defense once again had a great day.
Total Yards Allowed: 244
Total Passing Yards Allowed: 148
Total Rushing Yards Allowed: 96
So we held them under 250 yards. Under 150 Passing Yards. Under 100 Rushing Yards and under 20 points.
Honestly give the Rams credit. Not bad to get 18 points with that low of production.
Total Yards Allowed: 244
Total Passing Yards Allowed: 148
Total Rushing Yards Allowed: 96
So we held them under 250 yards. Under 150 Passing Yards. Under 100 Rushing Yards and under 20 points.
Honestly give the Rams credit. Not bad to get 18 points with that low of production.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
We were 4 rushing yards away from having literally exactly double each of their numbers if the 4 yards were in the redzone for a TD to replace a FGgo pak go wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:01Defense once again had a great day.
Total Yards Allowed: 244
Total Passing Yards Allowed: 148
Total Rushing Yards Allowed: 96
So we held them under 250 yards. Under 150 Passing Yards. Under 100 Rushing Yards and under 20 points.
Honestly give the Rams credit. Not bad to get 18 points with that low of production.
244 to 484 (-4)
148 to 296 (exact)
96 to 188 (-4)
18 to 32 (-4)
Man this team.
Even if they don't win it all, this has been about the most fun a season has been. Last 2 months they've really been dominant.
Really want a rematch with Brady in our house. Aaron has the yips in Raymond James. Always has. His first bad game as a starter was down there. I can't recall a game he played well there. At Lambeau this team will crush the Bucs.
Even if they don't win it all, this has been about the most fun a season has been. Last 2 months they've really been dominant.
Really want a rematch with Brady in our house. Aaron has the yips in Raymond James. Always has. His first bad game as a starter was down there. I can't recall a game he played well there. At Lambeau this team will crush the Bucs.
Last edited by Waldo on 16 Jan 2021 20:11, edited 1 time in total.
I think what was so cool was the first quarter. I was saying to my buddy when we just kept running down their throat, "I was like...if we can score a TD on the 2nd drive on the ground just pounding it...you know we are going to get our deep shots open up the 2nd half"YoHoChecko wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:01I'm not concerned about whether or not they were drops. The point is that there were missed opportunities when Rodgers and his WRs had chances but didn't connect. We didn't play flawlessly on offense and we still dominated the #1 defense (albeit with a damaged Donald).
It's the plus side of today's negatives. They were there and we were good enough for them not to matter.
We're just a very good football team who could stand to replace the ST coach and who have some concentration drops in our receiving corps
And just on cue....the way to beat the Packers is stop our run game. If our run goes off though, I just don't see us losing.
Last edited by go pak go on 16 Jan 2021 20:09, edited 1 time in total.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I thought 50/50lupedafiasco wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 19:55I thought the first one MVS had in the end zone was absolutely a drop. It was high but it was on the hands. Gotta make that one.
Also though the refs gave us no breaks.
The Tonyan hold call was valid but unnecessary. Jones already turned the corner. Good hold call though.
The Patrick hold call on Brockers was garbage.
Thought they could have thrown a PI on MVS on the deep shot
There is another one I am forgetting.
The Tonyan hold call was valid but unnecessary. Jones already turned the corner. Good hold call though.
The Patrick hold call on Brockers was garbage.
Thought they could have thrown a PI on MVS on the deep shot
There is another one I am forgetting.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
So MLF against his former teams seems pretty great, right?
This season we got
This season we got
- 30-16 against the Falcons
- 40-14 against Tennessee
- 32-18 against L.A.
If he wins the next two I will actually have a badge of honor.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:12So MLF against his former teams seems pretty great, right?
This season we got
- 30-16 against the Falcons
- 40-14 against Tennessee
- 32-18 against L.A.
I still witnessed MFL's first loss as a head coach. But I will also say I have witnessed a very rare MLF loss period.
- Crazylegs Starks
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3718
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
- Location: Northern WI
Phantom hold on Wagner. Even the announcers couldn't see it.go pak go wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:12Also though the refs gave us no breaks.
The Tonyan hold call was valid but unnecessary. Jones already turned the corner. Good hold call though.
The Patrick hold call on Brockers was garbage.
Thought they could have thrown a PI on MVS on the deep shot
There is another one I am forgetting.
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi
- Vince Lombardi
The Packers defense is allowing 19.5 points per game at Lambeau this season.
Only teams to score more than 18 points at Lambeau is all three division opponents.
Lions put up 21
Vikings put up 28
Bears put up 25
Only teams to score more than 18 points at Lambeau is all three division opponents.
Lions put up 21
Vikings put up 28
Bears put up 25
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14467
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Would have had to tip it down to himself. Could have come up with it, but not a drop by any means.BF004 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:09I thought 50/50lupedafiasco wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 19:55I thought the first one MVS had in the end zone was absolutely a drop. It was high but it was on the hands. Gotta make that one.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 27 Mar 2020 14:45
Any report on Crosby?
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
For sure, hit him in two hands.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:38Would have had to tip it down to himself. Could have come up with it, but not a drop by any means.BF004 wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 20:09I thought 50/50lupedafiasco wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 19:55I thought the first one MVS had in the end zone was absolutely a drop. It was high but it was on the hands. Gotta make that one.
Both had a sub par play. No one had an above average play.
Can guarantee Aaron won’t be happy with his throw. MVS will think he should have hauled that in.
Question.
Why the hell is Malik Taylor our kick returner?
Why are they not putting at least Jamal Williams back there? Like we have better options than Malik Taylor.
He just looks so uncomfortable back there.
Why the hell is Malik Taylor our kick returner?
Why are they not putting at least Jamal Williams back there? Like we have better options than Malik Taylor.
He just looks so uncomfortable back there.
- Crazylegs Starks
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3718
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
- Location: Northern WI
And he looks slooooow...
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi
- Vince Lombardi
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
This is why the players in my choose-your-own draft were filled with guys who have been KRers in college and can also fill some offensive roles.
But for now? We just settle for mediocre field position and keep having the best offense in the league. no worries.
But for now? We just settle for mediocre field position and keep having the best offense in the league. no worries.
Yeah but Jamaal Williams is clearly a better choice. He has running experience. He can pick lanes. I trust him to get to the 25.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 21:10This is why the players in my choose-your-own draft were filled with guys who have been KRers in college and can also fill some offensive roles.
But for now? We just settle for mediocre field position and keep having the best offense in the league. no worries.
With Taylor, I pray the ball goes to the endzone or if he can at least get to the 20...and not fumble.
Not even close. No disrespect to Murphy but Harlan lived through perhaps some of the darkest days of this franchise. He saved the Packers. Murphy took over a pretty good gig and has built some really cool sledding hills.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑16 Jan 2021 19:55Murphy has been every bit as good as Harlan, maybe better