Was it notes anywhere what his grade was?
Just curious.
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
this is very debatable, SF ran a lot between the tackles as well as outside, when Clark is your olny DT that can stand up a double team then the other has to at least control ONE gap and they couldn't, it's why Martinez looked lost, when more then one gap is open the Lber has to much to think about.
I just think it's ridiculous to say, "if we had a rookie DT we would have won a game that we lost 37 to 20 including being down 27-0 to at halftime and 34 to 7 early in the 3rd quarter.Yoop wrote: ↑17 Jan 2021 13:42this is very debatable, SF ran a lot between the tackles as well as outside, when Clark is your olny DT that can stand up a double team then the other has to at least control ONE gap and they couldn't, it's why Martinez looked lost, when more then one gap is open the Lber has to much to think about.
we only scored 20 points because of the pass rush and coverage, a WR might have helped, but that is also debatable
the rest of your thread is long, and I'am busy, I'll have to read it again later, but this just jumped out to me
never said we'd beat SF, my point was that Simmons would have helped more then Gary, you keep defending Gary the player, when my issue was using that slot on him.go pak go wrote: ↑17 Jan 2021 14:03I just think it's ridiculous to say, "if we had a rookie DT we would have won a game that we lost 37 to 20 including being down 27-0 to at halftime and 34 to 7 early in the 3rd quarter.Yoop wrote: ↑17 Jan 2021 13:42this is very debatable, SF ran a lot between the tackles as well as outside, when Clark is your olny DT that can stand up a double team then the other has to at least control ONE gap and they couldn't, it's why Martinez looked lost, when more then one gap is open the Lber has to much to think about.
we only scored 20 points because of the pass rush and coverage, a WR might have helped, but that is also debatable
the rest of your thread is long, and I'am busy, I'll have to read it again later, but this just jumped out to me
While at the same time having the same defensive players (except a rookie UDFA taking over Blake Martinez) one year later completely stiffen up vs the run including stopping the league's best rusher and also holding guys like Cam Akers to under 100 yards when the Rams clearly wanted to run the ball.
While also at the same time our very own rushers absolutely destroyed a Titans defense who has that specific DT on their squad. Again. Our team is really good. So far the front office has shown since taking over they know how to build a team. Hopefully they continue to prove they knew how to build a football team.
He was really good. He was literally one drop away from being Here's Johnny.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑17 Jan 2021 20:54Some new soundbytes this week.
Love the tick tick tick boom timing.
Also, watching this back, was Lazard better than I realized yesterday? (aside from the drop, obvi)
Green Bay pressured Jared Goff on 15 of Goff's 31 dropbacks which gives a pressure rate of 48.4%. That is the highest pressure rate the Rams allowed in a game under any game during Sean McVay's tenure as coach.
https://sports.yahoo.com/studs-duds-pac ... 35082.htmlDL Damon Harrison: The Packers had him on the field for just three plays. He got washed out of all three, so Dean Lowry and Tyler Lancaster got much of the work the rest of the way. The Packers might have been uncomfortable with having Harrison on the field against the Rams’ up-tempo looks.
I thought the play when Adams motioned left and then motioned all the way back to the right -- to catch that superultrafast snap pass from Rodgers in the endzone for the touchdown with All-Pro DB Jalen Ramsey exasperated was the perfect definition of MLF coming in here and getting everyone moving. Quite the genius offense. Those wide open deep passes to Lazard and MVS seem unique as well. Some of this was there under McCoach for example the pass from Aaron Rodgers to Randall Cobb versus Da Bears in Chicago (when Rodgers escaped to the left and fired the bullet to a wide open Cobb). But the motion plays and the run blocking schemes under MLF are much better than anything we saw under McCoach. Also the emergence of the 3 RB threat has been unique as well. How we do this without a blocking Kuuuuuuuuuuuuhn type FB is baffling. It's that offensive line that Gutey partly built I guess .......lupedafiasco wrote: ↑18 Jan 2021 21:58
I dont usually agree with Cow Turd but hes right here. Rodgers is really making MM look awful. Its something I had been saying for years. Management was failing Rodgers. MMs offense was horrible. Everything looked hard. Every pass needed to be one of those passes that was throwing someone open. Nobody was ever being schemed open. Then you had TT who was probably getting his players from games of bingo at his local senior citizen home.
ML comes in here and everyone is moving. Everyone is beng schemed open. You basically cant play man vs this team because of the motions and picks and crosses. Zones hard as well because of the motions and floods making defenses make adjustments in play with minimal communication prior to the snap.
seriously now, how many here enjoyed watching Rodgers extend plays hoping someone would clear, right to the point of taking a sack, or throwing it away, year after year, once Nelson, Cobb, Jones etc. skills had diminished that stuff became a regular routine, on schedule throws had become much more difficult, and the offense struggled.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑18 Jan 2021 21:58
I dont usually agree with Cow Turd but hes right here. Rodgers is really making MM look awful. Its something I had been saying for years. Management was failing Rodgers. MMs offense was horrible. Everything looked hard. Every pass needed to be one of those passes that was throwing someone open. Nobody was ever being schemed open. Then you had TT who was probably getting his players from games of bingo at his local senior citizen home.
ML comes in here and everyone is moving. Everyone is beng schemed open. You basically cant play man vs this team because of the motions and picks and crosses. Zones hard as well because of the motions and floods making defenses make adjustments in play with minimal communication prior to the snap.