Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2021

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Locked
User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »




QB carousel is real this year.

Goff, Stafford and Wentz all on the move. All #1 or #2 picks.
Image

Image

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8122
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

And pretty low risk for the Colts. Give up a couple of nice picks, but they can dump him at any point with minimal dead cap, right? Philly takes the hit. Indy pretty much pay as you go.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

Ghost_Lombardi
Reactions:
Posts: 1262
Joined: 05 Oct 2020 18:57

Post by Ghost_Lombardi »

I'm glad we finally know where the 4-11 Philly Eagles back up QB is going.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

Well that’s a shame. There goes any trade value that Love was worth.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

NCF wrote:
18 Feb 2021 10:54
And pretty low risk for the Colts. Give up a couple of nice picks, but they can dump him at any point with minimal dead cap, right? Philly takes the hit. Indy pretty much pay as you go.
Absolute steal.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Wentz has the 29th best QB Rating over the last 3 seasons among QBs with 300+ attempts. 31st in completion %. 33rd in yards/attempt.

We shall see how good he is, but the last 3 seasons haven't been.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
Labrev
Reactions:
Posts: 6487
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 00:01

Post by Labrev »

Yeah, I think Wentz is broken, but he went to the one place where he could credibly turn things around. I actually hope he does, he looked real good in the past, and Indy is not a team that I would mind benefitting.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”
—Magneto

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »




That said, I like the fit in Indy, Wentz gunna be pretty cheap for a vet QB, not giving up their 1st or 2nd, bunch of cap room.


They are already really good, quite good on O around QB, and have the capital to get even better.
Image

Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

BF004 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 13:24



That said, I like the fit in Indy, Wentz gunna be pretty cheap for a vet QB, not giving up their 1st or 2nd, bunch of cap room.


They are already really good, quite good on O around QB, and have the capital to get even better.
And even for the Eagles. Not the end of the world. You were gonna suck in 2021 anyways. Take the dead cap. You will find out if you have a player in Hurts. You draft early this year. You will likely draft early next year and you will have good cap space in 2022.

This is why I'm not afraid of having a lot of "dead cap" on Rodgers in 2023. Because when you decide to move on with a new QB...you likely aren't a SB threat anyways. So take your lump that year and start using it to build your roster for your next run.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

This is why I'm not afraid of having a lot of "dead cap" on Rodgers in 2023. Because when you decide to move on with a new QB...you likely aren't a SB threat anyways. So take your lump that year and start using it to build your roster for your next run.
Yet you are then resigning yourself to that even though it may not be true.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

Pckfn23 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 13:57
This is why I'm not afraid of having a lot of "dead cap" on Rodgers in 2023. Because when you decide to move on with a new QB...you likely aren't a SB threat anyways. So take your lump that year and start using it to build your roster for your next run.
Yet you are then resigning yourself to that even though it may not be true.
Yeah. I'm okay with that. We don't win when our roster is supposed to win.

So I'm not really in that "we still got a shot!" crowd.

Even 2010. Dead cap or no dead cap.... that wouldn't have made a difference that year either.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 12093
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

Pckfn23 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 13:57
This is why I'm not afraid of having a lot of "dead cap" on Rodgers in 2023. Because when you decide to move on with a new QB...you likely aren't a SB threat anyways. So take your lump that year and start using it to build your roster for your next run.
Yet you are then resigning yourself to that even though it may not be true.
I think our cap will be tighter once Rodgers is done then it is now, even with TV revenue, and if Gute does what he says he will (push cap to sign and keep this team together) that bill will come do about then to, plus that will be Loves first year, nah I sure don't see us SB bound
Last edited by Yoop on 18 Feb 2021 14:21, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

go pak go wrote:
18 Feb 2021 14:08
Pckfn23 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 13:57
This is why I'm not afraid of having a lot of "dead cap" on Rodgers in 2023. Because when you decide to move on with a new QB...you likely aren't a SB threat anyways. So take your lump that year and start using it to build your roster for your next run.
Yet you are then resigning yourself to that even though it may not be true.
Yeah. I'm okay with that. We don't win when our roster is supposed to win.

So I'm not really in that "we still got a shot!" crowd.

Even 2010. Dead cap or no dead cap.... that wouldn't have made a difference that year either.
Dead cap may have made a difference in 2010. We may have not been able to resign Ryan Pickett or Tramon Williams or even Aaron Rodgers! Or not be able to sign Howard Green.

All had a big impact on our SB win!
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

Ghost_Lombardi
Reactions:
Posts: 1262
Joined: 05 Oct 2020 18:57

Post by Ghost_Lombardi »

I think the Colts got fleeced. Wentz had made it known he wanted Indy and nowhere else. Eagles would have ended up releasing him. Bears pulled back after hearing he didn't want to play there.

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

Pckfn23 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 14:14
go pak go wrote:
18 Feb 2021 14:08
Pckfn23 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 13:57

Yet you are then resigning yourself to that even though it may not be true.
Yeah. I'm okay with that. We don't win when our roster is supposed to win.

So I'm not really in that "we still got a shot!" crowd.

Even 2010. Dead cap or no dead cap.... that wouldn't have made a difference that year either.
Dead cap may have made a difference in 2010. We may have not been able to resign Ryan Pickett or Tramon Williams or even Aaron Rodgers! Or not be able to sign Howard Green.

All had a big impact on our SB win!
Yeah. Good points.

But I also think 2010 is a horrible example I provided because again....we were in the roster ascension mode at that time.

Maybe 2008 would have been a better example. Wouldn't really matter if we had dead cap that we had to eat in 2008. In fact, I am pretty sure we did have to eat some Favre dead cap. And we used 2008 as a catapult to start building our 2009 - 2011 roster. And it was awesome.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Roster ascension or decline is usually only a hindsight thing. See 2020 for latest example. Personally, I can't see we will for sure be in roster decline in 2023 or 2024.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Mahomes likely to be the only QB taken in the first round, 2009-2017, who is going to play on their drafted teams. :shock:


With Biscky and Watson moving on.

Mahomes, Biscky and Watson all would be eligible for 5th year option this year.

Matt Ryan was drafted in 2008.


That is $%@# nuts.


I support zero initiative to replace Aaron Rodgers before his arm literally can no longer throw.
Image

Image

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

Russell "Magic Water" Wilson trade talk is heating up. Hope he goes someplace where he gets sacked as much or more.
Image
RIP JustJeff

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Pckfn23 wrote:
18 Feb 2021 15:13
Roster ascension or decline is usually only a hindsight thing. See 2020 for latest example. Personally, I can't see we will for sure be in roster decline in 2023 or 2024.
I mean look, I don't know who you're talking about but I spent last offseason adamant that we had a better roster in 2020 than in 2019. Made some pretty detailed posts about it. Hindsight is for the weak 8-) :lol:

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

paco wrote:
25 Feb 2021 09:50
Russell "Magic Water" Wilson trade talk is heating up. Hope he goes someplace where he gets sacked as much or more.
Wilson is right in his case to complain about the offensive line. The Seahawks have done an awful job trying to protect him. And it’s not like they haven’t tried because they did draft OL early but the lot of them were some really bad picks. Schneider came out hot nailing his picks but recently they’ve been horrible. James Carpenter. Germaine Ifedi. Horrible picks and all reaches IMO.

If Wilson wasn’t an athletic QB he would be the most sacked QB in the league. That man runs a marathon for his life every week avoiding the instasheds his lineman give up.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

Locked