2021 NFL Draft - Day 1 Discussion - NO SPOILERS

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9943
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

feel like we could have moved back and grabbed the fella
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

Gute sucks.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

This isn't an out-there pick. Many thought he'd sneak into the 1st. He should be a good compliment to Jaire. Very fast and he's got the size.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Here we go. DO NOT base the pick on media rankings. Most people wanted CB. Thought it was a 1st round need. The Packers liked Stokes at this point more than other CBs.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Drj820 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:47
feel like we could have moved back and grabbed the fella
Such a horrible take in this day and age, IMO.

There is no master sheet of where prospects are ranked.
Image

Image

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

BF004 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:49
Drj820 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:47
feel like we could have moved back and grabbed the fella
Such a horrible take in this day and age, IMO.

There is no master sheet of where prospects are ranked.
Exactly what I forecasted and low and behold it comes from one I had in mind too.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9943
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

BF004 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:49
Drj820 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:47
feel like we could have moved back and grabbed the fella
Such a horrible take in this day and age, IMO.

There is no master sheet of where prospects are ranked.
I just never heard much about Stokes being a first rounder but :idn:
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
Scott4Pack
Reactions:
Posts: 2816
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
Location: New Mexico

Post by Scott4Pack »

I like the pick. He has the size and speed. He finds the ball. He has good measureables, right?
If he coaches up well, he’s gonna be good. And this was a position of need.

But I am surprised that we didn’t pick Barmore or Koramoah.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Pckfn23 wrote:
27 Apr 2021 10:07
I have a feeling that due to the lack of access to personnel the draftniks are going to be WAY off on prospect "rankings," especially after round 1. This will then lead the consistently cynical to claim how poorly we did drafting as they are basing their own rankings off of draftnik rankings. I could see us taking a player who the draftniks sees as only a late 2nd round guy and hear the screams of "REACH" and "FIRE!" It's going to be SOOO much fun... :roll:
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
TheGreenMan
Reactions:
Posts: 1709
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 07:01
Location: Iowa

Post by TheGreenMan »

Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:49
Here we go. DO NOT base the pick on media rankings. Most people wanted CB. Thought it was a 1st round need. The Packers liked Stokes at this point more than other CBs.
100%
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

I mean the dude is the most athletic player in Green Bay history.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9943
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

BF004 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:49
Drj820 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:47
feel like we could have moved back and grabbed the fella
Such a horrible take in this day and age, IMO.

There is no master sheet of where prospects are ranked.
Basically saying I thought Stokes would be a second rounder is not that Hot of a take or controversial. Its just an option.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

His weakness is concerns on fluidity and needs to improve on his technical skills.

Overall I can't be upset with this pick. Give him a year to develop behind King. If we hit with Stokes....we will hit.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9943
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

go pak go wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:54
I mean the dude is the most athletic player in Green Bay history.
Great measurables
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9943
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:53
Pckfn23 wrote:
27 Apr 2021 10:07
I have a feeling that due to the lack of access to personnel the draftniks are going to be WAY off on prospect "rankings," especially after round 1. This will then lead the consistently cynical to claim how poorly we did drafting as they are basing their own rankings off of draftnik rankings. I could see us taking a player who the draftniks sees as only a late 2nd round guy and hear the screams of "REACH" and "FIRE!" It's going to be SOOO much fun... :roll:
nobodies really screamed that. Just a couple people didnt expect the pick and thought he would go in the second.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
Bogey
Reactions:
Posts: 588
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 22:22
Location: Green Bay

Post by Bogey »

TheGreenMan wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:53
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:49
Here we go. DO NOT base the pick on media rankings. Most people wanted CB. Thought it was a 1st round need. The Packers liked Stokes at this point more than other CBs.
100%
+1
The Packers lunatic fringe is more visible because of sheer numbers. The Packers have one of the largest fan bases in all of sports. If the fringe percentage is the same as with other teams, then we end up with larger volumes of nut jobs. - JustJeff

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13635
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Definitely in a spot where he can come in and earn some reps week 1, but we also don't have to throw him out there a ton either right away.


I mean, CB, other than C or G is probably our biggest need on paper, we hit it in round 1, guy with great size, amazing athelicism, good production from a big program, should be ready to contribute early.


Here's hoping Gute's 1st round CB's are like Ted's 2nd round WR's and 4th round OL.
Image

Image

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13973
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Drj820 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:56
Pckfn23 wrote:
29 Apr 2021 22:53
Pckfn23 wrote:
27 Apr 2021 10:07
I have a feeling that due to the lack of access to personnel the draftniks are going to be WAY off on prospect "rankings," especially after round 1. This will then lead the consistently cynical to claim how poorly we did drafting as they are basing their own rankings off of draftnik rankings. I could see us taking a player who the draftniks sees as only a late 2nd round guy and hear the screams of "REACH" and "FIRE!" It's going to be SOOO much fun... :roll:
nobodies really screamed that. Just a couple people didnt expect the pick and thought he would go in the second.
Ya, cause "Gute sucks" it's really screaming that... :roll:
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
TheGreenMan
Reactions:
Posts: 1709
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 07:01
Location: Iowa

Post by TheGreenMan »

Could have been Ahmad Carroll fellas.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
Foosball
Reactions:
Posts: 411
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 10:47
Location: 2203 miles from Lambeau Field

Post by Foosball »

He doesn’t tackle well in the run game. Offensive Coordinaters will attack him with WR screens.

Speed demon though.
Last edited by Foosball on 29 Apr 2021 23:13, edited 2 times in total.
Love is the answer…

Post Reply