Mandatory Minicamp

[Yoop]

this all goes back to what most of us agreed with when Love was traded up for and taken, why now, why not next year or the year after, the answer which is unexceptable to me is these guys don't come around every year, which actually they do, specially guys like Love who need a bunch of coaching.

Who would have been the guy you would have taken this year at our spot? Who was the guy that was available that is as good a prospect as Jordan Love when we took Eric Stokes this year?

Camp superstar Kyle Trask.

But seriously, all this talk about how unready he is and how he is a project, yet we blew up the relationship with the HOF QB for the guy. Doesn’t seem worth the risk to me.

My thing is that he would have multiple years to sit and everyone would know he just isn’t ready if we took him in say the 4th round. But I firmly believe by year TWO that first rounders should have learned enough to go learn on the field. I do believe it is good to sit a guy for a year, I just don’t believe it has to be multiple years or the process is being sabotaged. Love is a first rounder in year 2, time to hit open guys and show the world why Gutey “loved him”, not just liked. That was the standard right?

If you grab a guy in the first round and by year two the staff is still terrified to play him bc he is such a project, it’s wasn’t a draft steal..it was a reach.

Now of course, Love shuts all the critics up if he demonstrates he can play.

I think it was or became a two year plan because of covid, I believe Rodgers realized this, so the plan actually didn't have a time frame, it's become the season after Love shows he's ready to manage the offense in PS games or backup duty,and not be the reason we lose, not actually the reason we win though either, simply to play mistake free football, the fo office believes the team needs to carry the QB so to speak, once that happened Rodgers has more value in trade compensation.

[paco]

[go pak go]

Is practice open again today or closed to media?

If it is closed, what the hell are we going to argue about?

The price of beans.

Oh my gawd. The prices of commodities have been CRAZY this year.

[YoHoChecko]

Have we heard him speak since... the draft? Like, his draft?

[paco]

Have we heard him speak since... the draft? Like, his draft?

He spoke last training camp, apparently.

[YoHoChecko]

I'm gonna set the rules now. Sip whenever Love says footwork or fundamentals. Finish your drink if he mentions Rodgers by name.

[YoHoChecko]

So minicamp. Practices, you know, for guys who are here. Not Rodgers.

Andy Herman was very complimentary of Kamal Martin. That is exciting to me.

Was that just in his recap tweet or does he dive in deeper in one of his daily videos?

Why am I asking? I'm going to watch the video anyway. Good reminder, though.

[NCF]

So minicamp. Practices, you know, for guys who are here. Not Rodgers.

Andy Herman was very complimentary of Kamal Martin. That is exciting to me.

Was that just in his recap tweet or does he dive in deeper in one of his daily videos?

Why am I asking? I'm going to watch the video anyway. Good reminder, though.

Yeah, it was in today's Pack-A-Day. Nothing overly specific, just that he looked fast and smooth (that's not new) and more confident/comfortable.

[Ghost_Lombardi]

I'm gonna set the rules now. Sip whenever Love says footwork or fundamentals. Finish your drink if he mentions Rodgers by name.

Footwork

Fundamentals

Mechanics

Playbook

Learn as much as I can

Take advantage of the reps

Do what's best for the team

Team player

Thankful to even be here

Out of my control

Focus on what is in front of me

Not my place

[Drj820]

this all goes back to what most of us agreed with when Love was traded up for and taken, why now, why not next year or the year after, the answer which is unexceptable to me is these guys don't come around every year, which actually they do, specially guys like Love who need a bunch of coaching.

Who would have been the guy you would have taken this year at our spot? Who was the guy that was available that is as good a prospect as Jordan Love when we took Eric Stokes this year?

who knows, the point is if the plan is to groom one for years almost anyone thats done well in college, has good physical makeup and a decent IQ can become a very good QB, Bart Starr was a 17th round pick, Favre was a 2nd Rounder, Brady was a 5th this idea that we couldn't have passed on Love and found another a year or two later to groom a couple years holds no merit with me, more so the plan was to replace Rodgers as soon as possible, almost everything points to that, you simply refuse to acknowledge that reality and chose to believe Murphy and Guty with the " this year and beyond" comment, I don't, and neither does Rodgers.

I thought I was told Tim Boyle was a more than competent back up. What was the problem?

[NCF]

this all goes back to what most of us agreed with when Love was traded up for and taken, why now, why not next year or the year after, the answer which is unexceptable to me is these guys don't come around every year, which actually they do, specially guys like Love who need a bunch of coaching.

Who would have been the guy you would have taken this year at our spot? Who was the guy that was available that is as good a prospect as Jordan Love when we took Eric Stokes this year?

who knows, the point is if the plan is to groom one for years almost anyone thats done well in college, has good physical makeup and a decent IQ can become a very good QB, Bart Starr was a 17th round pick, Favre was a 2nd Rounder, Brady was a 5th this idea that we couldn't have passed on Love and found another a year or two later to groom a couple years holds no merit with me, more so the plan was to replace Rodgers as soon as possible, almost everything points to that, you simply refuse to acknowledge that reality and chose to believe Murphy and Guty with the " this year and beyond" comment, I don't, and neither does Rodgers.

So, no one. Got it. Thanks for playing. $%@# the rest of your post and its blabbering BS.

[go pak go]

I'm gonna set the rules now. Sip whenever Love says footwork or fundamentals. Finish your drink if he mentions Rodgers by name.

Footwork

Fundamentals

Mechanics

Playbook

Learn as much as I can

Take advantage of the reps

Do what's best for the team

Team player

Thankful to even be here

Out of my control

Focus on what is in front of me

Not my place

Control what I can control

[go pak go]

Who would have been the guy you would have taken this year at our spot? Who was the guy that was available that is as good a prospect as Jordan Love when we took Eric Stokes this year?

who knows, the point is if the plan is to groom one for years almost anyone thats done well in college, has good physical makeup and a decent IQ can become a very good QB, Bart Starr was a 17th round pick, Favre was a 2nd Rounder, Brady was a 5th this idea that we couldn't have passed on Love and found another a year or two later to groom a couple years holds no merit with me, more so the plan was to replace Rodgers as soon as possible, almost everything points to that, you simply refuse to acknowledge that reality and chose to believe Murphy and Guty with the " this year and beyond" comment, I don't, and neither does Rodgers.

So, no one. Got it. Thanks for playing. $%@# the rest of your post and its blabbering BS.

It's like the "we should have drafted a WR in rd 2 or rd 3 in last year's draft."

[NCF]

[NCF]

[BSA]

thx for posting, I got a quick look at the "lighter" version of Bronson Kaufusi # 45 at TE

[NCF]

[YoHoChecko]

[YoHoChecko]

Good grief

[YoHoChecko]

A new twist in the OLine alignment!