General Packer News 2021
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
I doubt Funchess is actually a 4.7 guy. Which would render him useless. No one has seen him play for years. Definitely an exciting one to watch in preseason. May be a keeper, may be a cut.
Lazard is no great athlete. He is a detail-oriented WR, which can elevate one's game quite a bit. Adams is not a 99 rated WR on Madden based on his body alone. He is physically nothing especially imposing. He makes himself more than that by wasting no motion, and by being more sharp and savvy than others.
Lazard is no great athlete. He is a detail-oriented WR, which can elevate one's game quite a bit. Adams is not a 99 rated WR on Madden based on his body alone. He is physically nothing especially imposing. He makes himself more than that by wasting no motion, and by being more sharp and savvy than others.
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
Combine Invite: Yessalmar80 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 04:37I doubt Funchess is actually a 4.7 guy. Which would render him useless. No one has seen him play for years. Definitely an exciting one to watch in preseason. May be a keeper, may be a cut.
Lazard is no great athlete. He is a detail-oriented WR, which can elevate one's game quite a bit. Adams is not a 99 rated WR on Madden based on his body alone. He is physically nothing especially imposing. He makes himself more than that by wasting no motion, and by being more sharp and savvy than others.
Height: 6042
Weight: 232
Zybek PD3X AKA "Official"
40 Yard Dash (ET): 4.70
40 Yard Dash (HH): 4.61
20 Yard (ET): 2.74
20 Yard (HH): 2.58
10 Yard (ET): 1.66
10 Yard (HH): 1.56 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 17
Vertical Jump: 38 1/2
Broad Jump: 10'02"
20 Yrd Shuttle:
3-Cone Drill: No Full Workout-Choice
He did much better in his pro day, for what they are worth.
Well that’s dissapointing. Availability continues to be the best ability.go pak go wrote: ↑13 Aug 2021 20:14Again. I don't know how many times I need to say this.
Funchess
Winfree
EQSB
They are all hurt right now. I very much doubt they play tomorrow considering they didn't practice yesterday.
But I will agree that Winfree is the beautiful wildcard in all of this. I hope he gets suited up soon.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
we love to use these stats just as coaches, GMs, and scouts do, diff. is, we use them as you are now to rate and compare to other players, where as once the draft is over Coaches, GM's and scouts put them in the players file rarely to ever be looked at again, because what they do in pads and on the field is what really matters.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 05:58Combine Invite: Yessalmar80 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 04:37I doubt Funchess is actually a 4.7 guy. Which would render him useless. No one has seen him play for years. Definitely an exciting one to watch in preseason. May be a keeper, may be a cut.
Lazard is no great athlete. He is a detail-oriented WR, which can elevate one's game quite a bit. Adams is not a 99 rated WR on Madden based on his body alone. He is physically nothing especially imposing. He makes himself more than that by wasting no motion, and by being more sharp and savvy than others.
Height: 6042
Weight: 232
Zybek PD3X AKA "Official"
40 Yard Dash (ET): 4.70
40 Yard Dash (HH): 4.61
20 Yard (ET): 2.74
20 Yard (HH): 2.58
10 Yard (ET): 1.66
10 Yard (HH): 1.56 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 17
Vertical Jump: 38 1/2
Broad Jump: 10'02"
20 Yrd Shuttle:
3-Cone Drill: No Full Workout-Choice
He did much better in his pro day, for what they are worth.
Funchess is not straight line fast, but he has quick feet and short area burst and agility which is why he was a 2nd round pick, Lazard is straight line fast, but has tight hips, and lack that agility to cut sharply in and out of his breaks which is probably the reason he went undrafted, we took a flyer on him and with Rodgers maxed out his production, thats why I see Funchess as a player that could bounce back from injury and a season off going back to 2017 form, and Lazard as a player with not much room to improve.
but I'am mostly basing this from a very small sample of just some TC vids, so we'll have to see how this shakes out.
A rare time we agree. But I agree.Yoop wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 08:09
we love to use these stats just as coaches, GMs, and scouts do, diff. is, we use them as you are now to rate and compare to other players, where as once the draft is over Coaches, GM's and scouts put them in the players file rarely to ever be looked at again, because what they do in pads and on the field is what really matters.
Especially too it's kind of pointless to use combine figures for players who did it 4 years ago. Like that is a lifetime ago.
I do understand you can segregate "kind of player" by combine, but players can absolutely get faster or slower after being in the league.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
Rodgers and Cobb taking to Instagram today to advocate bringing back Clay Matthews.
Nooooooooooooooo!
Nooooooooooooooo!
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
I am actually not opposed to this. BUT. It is a vet minimum deal. Matthews, if still in shape, could actually be a great option for us for coverage. And if he can do STs that would be great too.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 09:00Rodgers and Cobb taking to Instagram today to advocate bringing back Clay Matthews.
Nooooooooooooooo!
He actually played well when with the Rams in 2019.
A Matthews signing would result in Z/Gary playing a LOT of interior snaps.
Inmates trying to run the asylum as they say. LolScott4Pack wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 09:00Rodgers and Cobb taking to Instagram today to advocate bringing back Clay Matthews.
Nooooooooooooooo!
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
That’s not gonna happen. There’s no room for him. He would be the 4th best pass rusher and probably the 3rd best ILB and that’s being generous. He isn’t going to do anything for us on STs. I don’t think he’s done STs since college and a vet this deep into his career isn’t going to want to play on teams. That’s a young mans game.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 09:00Rodgers and Cobb taking to Instagram today to advocate bringing back Clay Matthews.
Nooooooooooooooo!
Cancelled by the forum elites.
bringing back Mathews on a friendly team contract makes sense, lets face it P. Smith aint coming back, hell I'am shocked he's coming back at all, cept he caved to a restructure, Mathews could finish his career here, heck 2 years ago he had 8 sacks and probably 40 hurries, he was better then Clowney who some here thought we should bring in.
Al
@ao5050
·
Nov 28, 2020
Clay Matthews in 2019 had 8 Sks 2 FF 3 PD 9 TFL vs Jadeveon Clowney 2019 who had 3 Sks 4 FF 1 TD 3 PD
7 TFL yet Clowney gets signed by Titans for 12Million and Matthews remains as a FA. Dont understand the logic. And Clowney is on IR again
Al
@ao5050
·
Nov 28, 2020
Clay Matthews in 2019 had 8 Sks 2 FF 3 PD 9 TFL vs Jadeveon Clowney 2019 who had 3 Sks 4 FF 1 TD 3 PD
7 TFL yet Clowney gets signed by Titans for 12Million and Matthews remains as a FA. Dont understand the logic. And Clowney is on IR again
Get ST help elsewhere. That #4 rusher is more important. If the dollars work (no idea what he might command), seems like the kind of all in move we should, at least, consider.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 09:49That’s not gonna happen. There’s no room for him. He would be the 4th best pass rusher and probably the 3rd best ILB and that’s being generous. He isn’t going to do anything for us on STs. I don’t think he’s done STs since college and a vet this deep into his career isn’t going to want to play on teams. That’s a young mans game.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 09:00Rodgers and Cobb taking to Instagram today to advocate bringing back Clay Matthews.
Nooooooooooooooo!
I will say it now, I’d do it in a heartbeat.
Read More. Post Less.
I just advocated for Watthews, but don’t bet against Preston. You want to quote 2019 stats, look at what Preston did.Yoop wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 11:21bringing back Mathews on a friendly team contract makes sense, lets face it P. Smith aint coming back, hell I'am shocked he's coming back at all, cept he caved to a restructure, Mathews could finish his career here, heck 2 years ago he had 8 sacks and probably 40 hurries, he was better then Clowney who some here thought we should bring in.
Al
@ao5050
·
Nov 28, 2020
Clay Matthews in 2019 had 8 Sks 2 FF 3 PD 9 TFL vs Jadeveon Clowney 2019 who had 3 Sks 4 FF 1 TD 3 PD
7 TFL yet Clowney gets signed by Titans for 12Million and Matthews remains as a FA. Dont understand the logic. And Clowney is on IR again
Read More. Post Less.
Bringing back preston and then bringing in Clay wouldn’t make sense to me. Plus with Roster cuts already going to be tough I don’t want a one year guy taking the spot of young guy with some potential.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
I just did, first off I just want to say that PFR is such a inconsistent reference sight, these people can't even add correctlyNCF wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 11:48I just advocated for Watthews, but don’t bet against Preston. You want to quote 2019 stats, look at what Preston did.Yoop wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 11:21bringing back Mathews on a friendly team contract makes sense, lets face it P. Smith aint coming back, hell I'am shocked he's coming back at all, cept he caved to a restructure, Mathews could finish his career here, heck 2 years ago he had 8 sacks and probably 40 hurries, he was better then Clowney who some here thought we should bring in.
Al
@ao5050
·
Nov 28, 2020
Clay Matthews in 2019 had 8 Sks 2 FF 3 PD 9 TFL vs Jadeveon Clowney 2019 who had 3 Sks 4 FF 1 TD 3 PD
7 TFL yet Clowney gets signed by Titans for 12Million and Matthews remains as a FA. Dont understand the logic. And Clowney is on IR again
.
they have P. Smith marked 12 sacks. 11 hurries, 9 QBhts, for a total pressure count of 34, so where did these 2 extra pressures come from?
thing is Preston goes from averaging 6 sacks a season over 4 years with WAsh. to 8 sacks a year with us, and he's needed big sack seasons to get that average for both teams, obviously we are counting on a rebound season over last years 4 sacks.
I read that Mathews turned down a offer from Denver last year, probably because they low balled the offer, just maybe he'd take less to play here.
I find it interesting that the "Rodgers is acting ridiculous camp" is leaning more on the side of "screw it...get Rodgers what he wants and let's get this last dance team complete."
And the "Management screwed Rodgers camp and should concede to his every wish as the cost of drafting Love is like
..."this move makes no sense. We are already so deep at Linebacker"
And the "Management screwed Rodgers camp and should concede to his every wish as the cost of drafting Love is like
..."this move makes no sense. We are already so deep at Linebacker"
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
As you hover over pressures on Pro Football Reference you get this definition, "QB pressure (hurries + knockdowns + all sack plays (half and full for players, just full sacks for teams))." So in other words a .5 sack will count as a full pressure for a player. Preston Smith had 4 half sacks in 2019. THAT is where the 2 "extra" pressures comes from. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... elog/2019/I just did, first off I just want to say that PFR is such a inconsistent reference sight, these people can't even add correctly
.
they have P. Smith marked 12 sacks. 11 hurries, 9 QBhts, for a total pressure count of 34, so where did these 2 extra pressures come from?
Clay Matthews didn't play for a team in 2020 after he was released by the Rams in March of 2020. There is probably a VERY good reason a 34 year old EDGE rusher/LB wasn't picked up for an entire year.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
where is this 1/2 sack listed? do they also count it as a QBHT, see this is why I don't like this reference sight and never have, the joggle this stuff around so much that all it's good for is giving a close idea of reality.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 12:45As you hover over pressures on Pro Football Reference you get this definition, "QB pressure (hurries + knockdowns + all sack plays (half and full for players, just full sacks for teams))." So in other words a .5 sack will count as a full pressure for a player. Preston Smith had 4 half sacks in 2019. THAT is where the 2 "extra" pressures comes from. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... elog/2019/I just did, first off I just want to say that PFR is such a inconsistent reference sight, these people can't even add correctly
.
they have P. Smith marked 12 sacks. 11 hurries, 9 QBhts, for a total pressure count of 34, so where did these 2 extra pressures come from?
Clay Matthews didn't play for a team in 2020 after he was released by the Rams in March of 2020. There is probably a VERY good reason a 34 year old EDGE rusher/LB wasn't picked up for an entire year.
PFF does a better and more concise job of tabulating this stuff, hell PFR total pressures differ from PFF by as much as a 1/3, just go look at Aaron Donalds stats for his best season, PFR's totals are 30 less pressures then PFF, and it's the same or close for all players, but never the same % wise for any player.
wha? I bet that Mathews is still better then anyone not named Smith or Gary, and Mathews is the one that emailed someone about wanting to play again for us, Rodgers and Cobb simply agreed they'd like him back.go pak go wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 12:31I find it interesting that the "Rodgers is acting ridiculous camp" is leaning more on the side of "screw it...get Rodgers what he wants and let's get this last dance team complete."
And the "Management screwed Rodgers camp and should concede to his every wish as the cost of drafting Love is like
..."this move makes no sense. We are already so deep at Linebacker"
you really hate that the FO caved in that Rodgers should have a voice in some personal decisions don't you?
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
The .5 sack is listed as a .5 sack... Since a sack is a pressure, a .5 sack is also a pressure. There is no "joggling" around. It is spelled out very clearly.Yoop wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 12:55where is this 1/2 sack listed? do they also count it as a QBHT, see this is why I don't like this reference sight and never have, the joggle this stuff around so much that all it's good for is giving a close idea of reality.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑14 Aug 2021 12:45As you hover over pressures on Pro Football Reference you get this definition, "QB pressure (hurries + knockdowns + all sack plays (half and full for players, just full sacks for teams))." So in other words a .5 sack will count as a full pressure for a player. Preston Smith had 4 half sacks in 2019. THAT is where the 2 "extra" pressures comes from. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... elog/2019/I just did, first off I just want to say that PFR is such a inconsistent reference sight, these people can't even add correctly
.
they have P. Smith marked 12 sacks. 11 hurries, 9 QBhts, for a total pressure count of 34, so where did these 2 extra pressures come from?
Clay Matthews didn't play for a team in 2020 after he was released by the Rams in March of 2020. There is probably a VERY good reason a 34 year old EDGE rusher/LB wasn't picked up for an entire year.
PFF does a better and more concise job of tabulating this stuff, hell PFR total pressures differ from PFF by as much as a 1/3, just go look at Aaron Donalds stats for his best season, PFR's totals are 30 less pressures then PFF, and it's the same or close for all players, but never the same % wise for any player.
PFR is obviously more conservative when handing out hurries. Hurries are subjective. That doesn't make either better or worse. It really doesn't matter if PFF does a better and more concise job or not, anyway. We, as a general fan, have no way to access that data without coughing up an extraordinary amount of money.
Last edited by Pckfn23 on 14 Aug 2021 13:03, edited 1 time in total.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."