Z has Surgery - Out Indefinitely

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

User avatar
TheSkeptic
Reactions:
Posts: 2179
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37

Post by TheSkeptic »

Back surgery. I wish they were more specific.
If he is able to return, it might not be until much later in the season. According to Sports Illustrated’s Bill Huber, Smith returning this year is “not the expectation or something the team is counting on”.
https://lombardiave.com/2021/10/01/pack ... inal-snap/

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

TheSkeptic wrote:
02 Oct 2021 15:34
Back surgery. I wish they were more specific.
If he is able to return, it might not be until much later in the season. According to Sports Illustrated’s Bill Huber, Smith returning this year is “not the expectation or something the team is counting on”.
https://lombardiave.com/2021/10/01/pack ... inal-snap/
Yeah saw this earlier. Pretty much sums it up as a fine deal IMO.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

kyle.mccarroll
Reactions:
Posts: 267
Joined: 09 Sep 2020 13:22

Post by kyle.mccarroll »

Weird, because I just saw a Rap report that Z should return later this year. I'd probably trust him over Huber.

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9945
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

kyle.mccarroll wrote:
03 Oct 2021 08:12
Weird, because I just saw a Rap report that Z should return later this year. I'd probably trust him over Huber.
I think both are guessing. Team is probably putting out optimistic propaganda, but that optimism may or may not become the reality.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

kyle.mccarroll wrote:
03 Oct 2021 08:12
Weird, because I just saw a Rap report that Z should return later this year. I'd probably trust him over Huber.
I trust Bill Huber over Rap because Huber is closer to the team. You never hear Ian Rap at Packers press conferences whereas Huber is a constant regular.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 12093
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

go pak go wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:10
I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
we know very little of the particular's, is it a disc repair, sounds like it, why operate on something like that unless it wont heal naturally? often they do.

doesn't sound as though the team wants out of his contract, which as has been reported non football injury's opens the door to, to me that means the team intends to bring him back either late this season or at least next year, Huber is guessing on the future of Z, as we all are, but for him to say the team isn't expecting him back is premature and without a foundation of any certainty, damn blow heart reporters.

User avatar
TheSkeptic
Reactions:
Posts: 2179
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37

Post by TheSkeptic »

Yoop wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:43
go pak go wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:10
I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
we know very little of the particular's, is it a disc repair, sounds like it, why operate on something like that unless it wont heal naturally? often they do.

doesn't sound as though the team wants out of his contract, which as has been reported non football injury's opens the door to, to me that means the team intends to bring him back either late this season or at least next year, Huber is guessing on the future of Z, as we all are, but for him to say the team isn't expecting him back is premature and without a foundation of any certainty, damn blow heart reporters.
The team is not counting on him being able to play THIS YEAR. That means there is hope but it is not probable.

Why wouldn't they want to resign him assuming that he makes a full recovery? Its pretty much a given that the Packers are going to lose AR and Adams so they can afford him.

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

TheSkeptic wrote:
03 Oct 2021 11:35
Yoop wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:43
go pak go wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:10
I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
we know very little of the particular's, is it a disc repair, sounds like it, why operate on something like that unless it wont heal naturally? often they do.

doesn't sound as though the team wants out of his contract, which as has been reported non football injury's opens the door to, to me that means the team intends to bring him back either late this season or at least next year, Huber is guessing on the future of Z, as we all are, but for him to say the team isn't expecting him back is premature and without a foundation of any certainty, damn blow heart reporters.
The team is not counting on him being able to play THIS YEAR. That means there is hope but it is not probable.

Why wouldn't they want to resign him assuming that he makes a full recovery? Its pretty much a given that the Packers are going to lose AR and Adams so they can afford him.
The question is how much value do you put on a player who hasn't played since January 2021 and coming off back surgery which does have a reputation of lingering and weakening players.

Right now Z Smith has a cap hit in 2022 of $28 million. I guarantee he isn't playing with that contract.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

Yoop wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:43
go pak go wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:10
I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
we know very little of the particular's, is it a disc repair, sounds like it, why operate on something like that unless it wont heal naturally? often they do.
The irony of saying "we know little of the particulars but then feel the freedom to insert your own diagnosis. :lol:
Neither the Packers nor Smith, who has yet to speak to reporters this season, has said exactly what the issue is with his back, whether it’s skeletal, disk-related or muscle-related. But after so much rehab, they must be concerned about his status for the year to put him on injured reserve.
Za’Darius Smith reported to camp with the back injury and since he wasn’t suffering from it last year or from off-season workouts, it’s considered a “non-football” injury. He was placed on the reserve/NFI list upon reporting to camp and stayed there until Aug. 16.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 7828
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

Yoop wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:43
go pak go wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:10
I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
we know very little of the particular's, is it a disc repair, sounds like it, why operate on something like that unless it wont heal naturally? often they do.

doesn't sound as though the team wants out of his contract, which as has been reported non football injury's opens the door to, to me that means the team intends to bring him back either late this season or at least next year, Huber is guessing on the future of Z, as we all are, but for him to say the team isn't expecting him back is premature and without a foundation of any certainty, damn blow heart reporters.
I gotta agree with Yoop here. You’re basing a lot of your frustrations on assumption and supposition. None of us have a clue as to the extent of his injury. To then tie it to any contract issue is a stretch.

Back injuries are tough to diagnose. If team doctors believed it would heal, I’d take their expert expectation as reasonable and not knock a player who has, for the most part, been worth every penny of the money the team has paid him thus far.

If I’m gonna tie his injury to anything contract related, I think it’s likely he hurt himself while training in an attempt to come into camp in the best of shape to maximize any new contract offering. That he got hurt doing the right thing is forgivable and certainly nothing to be mad about.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

APB wrote:
03 Oct 2021 13:48
Yoop wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:43
go pak go wrote:
03 Oct 2021 10:10
I am just mad because all of this could have been avoided.

It sounds like Z injured himself in that April - June period. I don't know if they just couldn't diagnose it yet or they though maybe "time" will heal it and he could be ready by week 1 whereas surgery would knock him out a while and he also wanted a contract extension.

It's just frustrating because if this surgery happened in June rather than September, he would have likely been back by December.

I hate it when injuries happen and the prognosis is "let's just try and get through this season and take care of it next March." Especially when the injury happens in the spring already.
we know very little of the particular's, is it a disc repair, sounds like it, why operate on something like that unless it wont heal naturally? often they do.

doesn't sound as though the team wants out of his contract, which as has been reported non football injury's opens the door to, to me that means the team intends to bring him back either late this season or at least next year, Huber is guessing on the future of Z, as we all are, but for him to say the team isn't expecting him back is premature and without a foundation of any certainty, damn blow heart reporters.
I gotta agree with Yoop here. You’re basing a lot of your frustrations on assumption and supposition. None of us have a clue as to the extent of his injury. To then tie it to any contract issue is a stretch.

Back injuries are tough to diagnose. If team doctors believed it would heal, I’d take their expert expectation as reasonable and not knock a player who has, for the most part, been worth every penny of the money the team has paid him thus far.

If I’m gonna tie his injury to anything contract related, I think it’s likely he hurt himself while training in an attempt to come into camp in the best of shape to maximize any new contract offering. That he got hurt doing the right thing is forgivable and certainly nothing to be mad about.
Too many beat reporters saying theres a little more to this for it to just be dismissed. We will likely get a little more out of this story once Smith leaves the team but Ive heard from 3 different beat guys saying that Smith was furious with the team leading up to this season between contract discussions and the captain's issue.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

Ghost_Lombardi
Reactions:
Posts: 1262
Joined: 05 Oct 2020 18:57

Post by Ghost_Lombardi »

If I am his agent I want him back on the field this year, showing he is healthy. He's not going to be in GB next year and needs to show out for the next payday.

User avatar
TheSkeptic
Reactions:
Posts: 2179
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37

Post by TheSkeptic »

Ghost_Lombardi wrote:
03 Oct 2021 20:26
If I am his agent I want him back on the field this year, showing he is healthy. He's not going to be in GB next year and needs to show out for the next payday.
And if he returns too early and hurts it again, even if it is a minor re-injury, then he is not going to get a payday from anyone.

But I don't get why he will not be in GB next year. It seems to me that the GB medical staff would know more about him than any other team's medical staff. So if he is 100% they would know this whereas most other teams would be guessing. I suppose the other teams could do an MRI but even though they are generally regarded as safe having a half dozen of them in a few weeks might not be the greatest idea.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5126
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

Ghost_Lombardi wrote:
03 Oct 2021 20:26
If I am his agent I want him back on the field this year, showing he is healthy. He's not going to be in GB next year and needs to show out for the next payday.
Absolutely not. You want him getting healthy. The smart move is not rushing back from injury.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 7828
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

lupedafiasco wrote: Too many beat reporters saying theres a little more to this for it to just be dismissed. We will likely get a little more out of this story once Smith leaves the team but Ive heard from 3 different beat guys saying that Smith was furious with the team leading up to this season between contract discussions and the captain's issue.
Those same beat reporters who were all over the breaking Rodgers story this past summer?

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

For the record, we're 3-0 without Z and 0-1 with him this season :mrgreen: :lol: :messedup:

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13136
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

MLF on Z: "We are hopeful to get him back. But we don't have a specific time period. All we know is it will be a while. We want him back because he is obviously a big part of our football team and we know Z is working hard to get back"

*Paraphrased*
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

Ghost_Lombardi
Reactions:
Posts: 1262
Joined: 05 Oct 2020 18:57

Post by Ghost_Lombardi »

lupedafiasco wrote:
04 Oct 2021 03:20
Ghost_Lombardi wrote:
03 Oct 2021 20:26
If I am his agent I want him back on the field this year, showing he is healthy. He's not going to be in GB next year and needs to show out for the next payday.
Absolutely not. You want him getting healthy. The smart move is not rushing back from injury.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8122
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Sounds like indefinitely might be gaining a little definition. Not sure I can handle the mystery, but if we get Z back and he can be effective… just, wow.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

Post Reply