Unfortunately, yes. But those fans don't matter
Davante Adams to COVID List
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
well of course a opposing coach has to at minimum show a propriety towards firing up his players, so I wouldn't expect him to show a sigh of relief that Adams wont play.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑28 Oct 2021 13:01Are you sure fans have said that? I have only witnessed an eerie rise in confidence since Adams went out. It started with some rounds of "we're doomed," sure, but moved immediately to "well, now that the pressure is off, maybe we can run a clean game on offense and spread it around." I mean the opposing coach even said as much.
Rodgers completed 77% of his passes last week on ???? 34 attempts, I'd love to see close to that repeated, but without Adams that will be much tougher
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 510
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 09:49
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9694
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
It's weird to me how many people reacted to Kingsbury's comments this way "of course a coach will say that" while also acknowledging that it has been objectively true in recent seasons.
Like "that coach is telling the truth, but he probably doesn't believe it; he's just saying it" is a really weird emotional game of Twister.
Not trying to derail, just looking for confirmation.
Adam was jabbed. He tested positive. He is out for the game tonight. He gets paid for tonight's game.
Lazard was not jabbed. He did not test positive. He was a close contact (presumably of Adams?). He is out for the game tonight. He does NOT get paid for tonight's game.
Is this correct?
Adam was jabbed. He tested positive. He is out for the game tonight. He gets paid for tonight's game.
Lazard was not jabbed. He did not test positive. He was a close contact (presumably of Adams?). He is out for the game tonight. He does NOT get paid for tonight's game.
Is this correct?
He gets paid, but does not get this game's roster bonus.wallyuwl wrote: ↑28 Oct 2021 17:41Not trying to derail, just looking for confirmation.
Adam was jabbed. He tested positive. He is out for the game tonight. He gets paid for tonight's game.
Lazard was not jabbed. He did not test positive. He was a close contact (presumably of Adams?). He is out for the game tonight. He does NOT get paid for tonight's game.
Is this correct?
RIP JustJeff
Don’t ruin the thread here, this part not a question of whether he should have gotten the jab or not (I say unequivocally yes, but I won’t judge). But just the reality of the situation.
The policy and enforcement is what should have players and fans up in arms, not whether he had the vax or not. I mean, ffs, the guy tested negative 5 straight days, was asymptomatic, and apparently wasn’t even a close contact. What are we doing here aside from trying to impose their rule?
They can say he wasn't, but really, he wasn't? We could probably watch last weeks game and see they were sitting next to each other. Not sure if that is what is happening here. Oh well, it didn't matter!APB wrote: ↑28 Oct 2021 23:54The policy and enforcement is what should have players and fans up in arms, not whether he had the vax or not. I mean, ffs, the guy tested negative 5 straight days, was asymptomatic, and apparently wasn’t even a close contact. What are we doing here aside from trying to impose their rule?
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3918
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Half Empty wrote: ↑28 Oct 2021 14:59Care to list those that do matter? It'll save me reading the irrelevant posts.