Thought pretty much the same thing.
I mean, it might be kind of cool for some people. But when you ship out 100k for free and also sell them, kind of loses its novelty.
General Packers News 2020
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
I think Gute did the prudent thing by signing Wagner when Bulaga left. Wagner isn't Bulaga but he isn't terrible either. If Kirksey can stay healthy he is an upgrade over Martinez IMO. And if Fuchness can return to his Carolina Panther form we have a nice vet WR to compliment Adams. The ILB and WR do have health question marks but we know they can play and produce at this level. Who knows with any of these rookies.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑24 Apr 2020 11:57Why do you think other contenders had fewer needs?
As I mentioned, after trading away Buckner and letting Sanders walk, the 49ers had needs there. The Saints need a #2 WR just as badly, if not more so, than we do; and their defense has more holes than ours. The Cowboys and Eagles have plenty of needs and t's kind of you to even call them contenders. The Vikings have, thus far, only replaced the players they lost. Further, not every draft pick works.
I don't like the pick, either. I think it is a year or two too early to draft the heir apparent. I think trading up and losing a 4th in a deep draft at need positions was a mistake. I, in fact, called it "unforgiveable."
But acting as if all the other teams are getting loads better while we aren't is an overreaction. Like, I'm sorry, but a rookie C is not putting the Saints over the top; that's just ridiculous. Justin Jefferson is in no way assured to be able to replace Diggs' production--he's probably a downgrade at least in the short term. Brandon Ayiuk, as we all mentioned here, is a great fit for the offenses we and the 49ers run, but is also a very raw route runner despite being a senior rather than an early-entrant.
At 26, Queen was the only player left on my board that I wanted in the first round. It was a very bad board for us after the early-mid twenties. Had we stayed put, Queen would have been gone, too. And Gutey said the trade down options were not very appealing. To evidence that, we got a bargain on the trade to move up; trade charts that were accurate on other first-round trades had us needing to give a 3 and take back a 5, or to give a 4 and a 5. Teams moving down struggled to find partners.
So we were sitting at the end of round one with fairly few options. Let's see if we get a starting WR and a starting-caliber developmental OT, and a guy who can compete for time at ILB by the end of the next couple rounds. I've been saying all offseason the rookie impact from this class was going to be very limited by the fact that we really only have an opening at WR and MLF tends to prefer rookies to develop on the bench or in part time roles.
Read More. Post Less.
Plus the cap will rise about 13-15M.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
Wait, what is different?
https://overthecap.com/calculator/green-bay-packers/
- image.png (28.26 KiB) Viewed 817 times
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
-
Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/cap/2021/#
Code: Select all
2021 Cap Totals
CAP TYPE CAP TOTAL
2021 NFL Salary Cap $209,000,000
2020 Rollover Cap $0
Adjustment $0
Adjusted Salary Cap $209,000,000
All Contracts $175,073,416
Top 51 Contracts $175,073,416
Total (All) $175,073,416
Total (w/Top 51) $175,073,416
Cap Space (w/All) $33,926,584
Cap Space (w/Top 51) $33,926,584
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Sportrac has more than that as well:
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/cap/2021/
- image.png (29.46 KiB) Viewed 815 times
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
-
Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14470
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
He had a steady salary cap from 2020 to 2021. Plus the $7.5 million they inexplicably put down for in season transactions. And the $184 million for current contracts in 2021 seems off.
Last edited by Pckfn23 on 04 May 2020 16:29, edited 1 time in total.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Yeah, that guy does not make sense.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
At least 10, I figure it to be higher this next year because TV revenues. Raises per year:
2013-2014- 10M
2014-2015- 10.28M
2015-2016- 11.99M
2016-2017- 11.73M
2017-2018- 10.2M
2018-2019- 11M
2019-2020- 10M
With the new CBA, it will rise.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
-
TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
it wont rise as much as you think, if at all, if the nfl doesnt get revenue from fans in the stands, or half its fans are unemployed next season.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
-
BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I guess I may be not as confident as you that trend will keep going next year.
-
YoHoChecko
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
This is cool because of what it is....
...but also because our WR coach is a young nobody and I'm stoked to have Martin in there helping him out.
...but also because our WR coach is a young nobody and I'm stoked to have Martin in there helping him out.
-
Turk's B.B.C.
- Reactions:
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 13:59
Interesting to see Ruvell is a Saginaw Valley State alumnus, as was a seventh-round WR a few seasons later...
-
Turk's B.B.C.
- Reactions:
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 13:59
...and MLF was Martin's QB at college?
I'm just hoping it doesn't fall honestly.BF004 wrote: ↑06 May 2020 08:33I guess I may be not as confident as you that trend will keep going next year.
