viewtopic.php?f=8&p=69883#p69883BF004 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021 10:56Ghost_Lombardi wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021 10:51I've been busy work this week.
Apparently Rodgers has COVID. Did you guys already talk about this?
_
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
viewtopic.php?f=8&p=69883#p69883BF004 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021 10:56Ghost_Lombardi wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021 10:51I've been busy work this week.
Apparently Rodgers has COVID. Did you guys already talk about this?
What? Rodgers has Covid?!Ghost_Lombardi wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021 10:51I've been busy working this week.
Apparently Rodgers has COVID. Did you guys already talk about this?
BF004 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2021 10:36Wow, Florio is a petty !@#$.
Blocks Benkert and posts it and takes a dig at him for not taking NFL snaps. This after screwing up his last hit piece article on the Packers QB situation and Benkert calls him out.
Stupid to even care, but Kurt’s response had about 4x likes as Florio’s.
Yes
Mayock had a whopping five 1st rounders in his first two seasons. Ferrell's been a bust and was a 4th overall pick, RB Josh Jacobs was good early but has averaged under 4 yds/carry the last two seasons (you do NOT want that if you use a 1st rounder on a RB), S Johnathan Abram has been OK not great (we chose wisely with Savage), Ruggs will be in prison, CB Arnette has been disappointing on the field and apparently has a hit-and-run under his belt.
who was this certain poster? anyway I didn't think Ferrell was a top ten pick then, along with Gary, in fact any player that is picked that high and takes 3 years to play up to such a high selection (except QB's) is not a wise choice, you've paid out 2/3rds of his rookie contract prior to his proven he's worth resigning, and if he does well those last couple seasons ya might not b e able to afford his contract demands anyway, imo the top 15 or so picks should be starting at some point as a rookie, like Stokes, or Alexander, or Savage, Gary obviously isn't a bust, but he's no great draft pick either when ya consider slot taken and time it's taken for him to play well.go pak go wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 05:51Yes
I remember articles being brought in by a certain poster in 2019 complaining about Gary "riding the pine" and how all the other pass rushers were great but we all could blatantly see that Gary was a bust from Michigan since he didn't produce.
This is a classic, classic example of not judging something too early. It is why we must view draft picks in a 3 or 4 year period.
I wasn’t a huge Ruggs guy that year, but he did better on the field than I was anticipating. Drinking and driving doesn’t necessarily make you a turd per se, horrible decision with about worst imaginable consequences. But don’t think he was ever a bad intentioned guy. Not to the point where character flaws really should have been effecting draft stock. So not gunna ding Mayock for that one.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 08:53Almost every high pick Mayock had made was massively over rated according to my board.
I think he’s been one of the worst GMs of the past decade. Maybe even 2. It’s hard to find someone who has done as much dumb &%$@ as he is. The Ferrell pick was crazy to me. Then he took Ruggs which I get with the speed I guess but I would have rather taken Jefferson, Jeudy, or Lamb over him.
Matt Millen will fight him for the first decade of this century.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 08:53Almost every high pick Mayock had made was massively over rated according to my board.
I think he’s been one of the worst GMs of the past decade. Maybe even 2. It’s hard to find someone who has done as much dumb &%$@ as he is. The Ferrell pick was crazy to me. Then he took Ruggs which I get with the speed I guess but I would have rather taken Jefferson, Jeudy, or Lamb over him.
Obviously that's the GOAL, GOAL right? Get a player who has immediate impact and then stays that way? But those are the elite of the elite picks and honestly very rare. Like Stokes and Alexander are AMAZING draft picks.Yoop wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 08:17who was this certain poster? anyway I didn't think Ferrell was a top ten pick then, along with Gary, in fact any player that is picked that high and takes 3 years to play up to such a high selection (except QB's) is not a wise choice, you've paid out 2/3rds of his rookie contract prior to his proven he's worth resigning, and if he does well those last couple seasons ya might not b e able to afford his contract demands anyway, imo the top 15 or so picks should be starting at some point as a rookie, like Stokes, or Alexander, or Savage, Gary obviously isn't a bust, but he's no great draft pick either when ya consider slot taken and time it's taken for him to play well.go pak go wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 05:51Yes
I remember articles being brought in by a certain poster in 2019 complaining about Gary "riding the pine" and how all the other pass rushers were great but we all could blatantly see that Gary was a bust from Michigan since he didn't produce.
This is a classic, classic example of not judging something too early. It is why we must view draft picks in a 3 or 4 year period.
Need him to suck this week and then kick a$$ in two weeks.
bviously that's the GOAL, GOAL right? Get a player who has immediate impact and then stays that way? But those are the elite of the elite picks and honestly very rare. Like Stokes and Alexander are AMAZING draft picks.go pak go wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 10:16Obviously that's the GOAL, GOAL right? Get a player who has immediate impact and then stays that way? But those are the elite of the elite picks and honestly very rare. Like Stokes and Alexander are AMAZING draft picks.Yoop wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 08:17who was this certain poster? anyway I didn't think Ferrell was a top ten pick then, along with Gary, in fact any player that is picked that high and takes 3 years to play up to such a high selection (except QB's) is not a wise choice, you've paid out 2/3rds of his rookie contract prior to his proven he's worth resigning, and if he does well those last couple seasons ya might not b e able to afford his contract demands anyway, imo the top 15 or so picks should be starting at some point as a rookie, like Stokes, or Alexander, or Savage, Gary obviously isn't a bust, but he's no great draft pick either when ya consider slot taken and time it's taken for him to play well.go pak go wrote: ↑07 Nov 2021 05:51
Yes
I remember articles being brought in by a certain poster in 2019 complaining about Gary "riding the pine" and how all the other pass rushers were great but we all could blatantly see that Gary was a bust from Michigan since he didn't produce.
This is a classic, classic example of not judging something too early. It is why we must view draft picks in a 3 or 4 year period.
I mean under your criteria, of 1st rounders needing to have immediate starting impact, you would say that Kenny Clark, Jordy Nelson and Rashan Gary are bad picks but Damarious Randall was a great pick because he provided production as a starter. And even looked good doing so in 2015.
Whereas I am of the firm belief of just get good players. If you have a great player, you will find a way to keep him. Period.
See what I actually think is more harmful is getting a guy who produces ridiculously on the rookie contract, signs a NFL highest 2nd contract and then the production drops.
Take Clay Matthews or Randall Cobb for instance. Great rookie contract players. Not worth their 2nd contracts and fans got mad about it because our cap is being allocated on past performance and name.
You will always have to have high end contracts. The key is those high end contracts produce. That's far more important than putting the stress on your rookie contract folks to produce. It's a bonus when they do and I welcome it when it happens, but it isn't the full judgement of a player.
Sounds like he was another peach of a human being. Flashing guns and threatening to kill people on video. Crashed 4 rental cars during his first year in the league.