When was Cousins sent home? I don't recall this and I wouldn't have said that. IMO his health decisions are between him and his doctor. It appears it doesn't matter if you get the shots or not. Anybody can get it. The good thing for healthy professional athletes is the chances they will be deathly sick is miniscule.Raptorman wrote: ↑04 Nov 2021 22:20Wait, wait, wait. Remember when Cousins was sent home and it was leaked that he wasn't vaccinated? Football fans were all like, "What an a$$hole" "Not a team player." "Not how a leader would be.". No one here cared about his rights to privacy. My how things change when it's Rodgers.Drj820 wrote: ↑04 Nov 2021 18:38Not unfair, but we are in pretty new territory. Most other leaks from the NFLN would not have anything to do with someone private health status...when it is league policy not to reveal whether someone is vaxxed or not.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑04 Nov 2021 18:12
Nah. No way. If the league leaks and league media arm were a conflict that mattered, we'd have had 8,000 stories like that by now.
Flori's a lawyer; he just takes a litigious view on everything.
Also, Rodgers being pissed that his status leaked is dumb. It was always going to be obvious once he tested positive. That they bumped it up a couple days is not in any way a tangible harm to anyone.
You are right that in just a couple days we would all know anyways, but everyone putting 2 and 2 together seems different than the league being responsible for the sharing of information that is in their policy not to share.
So I wonder if there is any recourse for the league breaking their own agreement with the union.
General Packer News 2021
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Interesting, been happening more frequently in the AFC as of late.
Still sitting at the #2 seed. Not sure how it would play out with us and Dallas in tiebreakers. They lost to the Rams and Broncos. So similar conference records. As far as common games, we will have Rams, Saints, Chiefs, Arizona, Washington x2 (for them), Minnesota x2 (for us).
Dallas: Saints, Chiefs, Arizona, Washington. Washington, Minnesota (1-0)
Packers: Saints, Chiefs, Arizona, Washington , Minnesota, Minnesota. (2-2)
Sitting a little better against TB
TB: Rams, Bears, Saints, Saints, Washington (1-2)
GB: Rams, Bears, Bears, Saints, Washington (2-1)
That Washington turned out to be a fairly big win, lol.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
The 2014 Seahawks had 4 losses.go pak go wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:35How many times does 4 losses get the #1 seed?
I bet that is quite rare as well.
Without looking into it, I bet the recipe for top seeds is 3 losses and controlling the tie breakers.
Right now, the Packers have the tie breaker over the NFC West (head to head with AZ), NFC South (conference record TB), and I don't know about Dallas. (I would imagine it comes down to Strength of Schedule)
Now with 17 games, 4 could become more normal.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Any news on Kenny Clark and Stokes?
That's the question. Its clear that Rodgers did not with press conferences. Those seems several teams were confused with those rules. The question is, was anything else not followed. I'm sure we'll find out soon enough.
RIP JustJeff
Nothing so far on twitter. MLF talking now, but I'm not listening. He probably wouldn't say anything anyway.
RIP JustJeff
Since the change from 3 divisions to 4 divisions (2002), there have been 12-4 #1 NFC seeds in 2002, 2003, 2008 and 2014. So 15 out of 19 years you needed at least a 13-3 record to hope for the top seed.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:43The 2014 Seahawks had 4 losses.go pak go wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:35How many times does 4 losses get the #1 seed?
I bet that is quite rare as well.
Without looking into it, I bet the recipe for top seeds is 3 losses and controlling the tie breakers.
Right now, the Packers have the tie breaker over the NFC West (head to head with AZ), NFC South (conference record TB), and I don't know about Dallas. (I would imagine it comes down to Strength of Schedule)
Now with 17 games, 4 could become more normal.
Everyone is "no concern long term" and yet everyone that this is said about seems to miss a month this year.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 267
- Joined: 09 Sep 2020 13:22
It really feels like MLF is protecting everyone as much as they can for the stretch run this year. Especially considering how much of a lead we have in the division right now.
Sucks for the race in seeding, but I guess I won't argue with the results if weeks 14-18 mean we have Bak, Clark, JA, and Z all playing. Just hard to be patient right now.
Sucks for the race in seeding, but I guess I won't argue with the results if weeks 14-18 mean we have Bak, Clark, JA, and Z all playing. Just hard to be patient right now.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Times less than 3 losses got the 1 seed:go pak go wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:56Since the change from 3 divisions to 4 divisions (2002), there have been 12-4 #1 NFC seeds in 2002, 2003, 2008 and 2014. So 15 out of 19 years you needed at least a 13-3 record to hope for the top seed.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:43The 2014 Seahawks had 4 losses.go pak go wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:35
How many times does 4 losses get the #1 seed?
I bet that is quite rare as well.
Without looking into it, I bet the recipe for top seeds is 3 losses and controlling the tie breakers.
Right now, the Packers have the tie breaker over the NFC West (head to head with AZ), NFC South (conference record TB), and I don't know about Dallas. (I would imagine it comes down to Strength of Schedule)
Now with 17 games, 4 could become more normal.
2015 - 15-1
2011 - 15-1
3 losses will probably still be the mode going forward, but I would say with the extra game we might start seeing 4 losses be more of the norm.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Yeah but that's better than Coach *crying* when asked how badly they're injured.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
He was sent home during Training camp. Him and Mond. I remember how everyone was saying how he was a bad leader, selfish, not a team player. This is from and AP story.Pugger wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:39When was Cousins sent home? I don't recall this and I wouldn't have said that. IMO his health decisions are between him and his doctor. It appears it doesn't matter if you get the shots or not. Anybody can get it. The good thing for healthy professional athletes is the chances they will be deathly sick is miniscule.Raptorman wrote: ↑04 Nov 2021 22:20Wait, wait, wait. Remember when Cousins was sent home and it was leaked that he wasn't vaccinated? Football fans were all like, "What an a$$hole" "Not a team player." "Not how a leader would be.". No one here cared about his rights to privacy. My how things change when it's Rodgers.Drj820 wrote: ↑04 Nov 2021 18:38
Not unfair, but we are in pretty new territory. Most other leaks from the NFLN would not have anything to do with someone private health status...when it is league policy not to reveal whether someone is vaxxed or not.
You are right that in just a couple days we would all know anyways, but everyone putting 2 and 2 together seems different than the league being responsible for the sharing of information that is in their policy not to share.
So I wonder if there is any recourse for the league breaking their own agreement with the union.
You won't find the same kind of tone in a Rodgers story.
https://apnews.com/article/sports-nfl-f ... 301535c2b1Sports should be no different. For the good of their sports and their teammates athletes should face only one simple choice.
Get the shot or take the ball and go home.
Any more of this needs to be discussed elsewhere.
Last edited by Raptorman on 08 Nov 2021 16:33, edited 1 time in total.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
You will absolutely find stories and comments like that on Rodgers. So... Stop whining about it.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Cry me a river. Rodgers is being excoriated over this in many quarters a hell of lot more than Cousins ever did. Some are saying he the NFL should suspend him for several games and the Packer should lose draft picks. I heard one say he should be kicked out of the league!Raptorman wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 16:29He was sent home during Training camp. Him and Mond. I remember how everyone was saying how he was a bad leader, selfish, not a team player. This is from and AP story.Pugger wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 14:39When was Cousins sent home? I don't recall this and I wouldn't have said that. IMO his health decisions are between him and his doctor. It appears it doesn't matter if you get the shots or not. Anybody can get it. The good thing for healthy professional athletes is the chances they will be deathly sick is miniscule.Raptorman wrote: ↑04 Nov 2021 22:20
Wait, wait, wait. Remember when Cousins was sent home and it was leaked that he wasn't vaccinated? Football fans were all like, "What an a$$hole" "Not a team player." "Not how a leader would be.". No one here cared about his rights to privacy. My how things change when it's Rodgers.
You won't find the same kind of tone in a Rodgers story.
https://apnews.com/article/sports-nfl-f ... 301535c2b1Sports should be no different. For the good of their sports and their teammates athletes should face only one simple choice.
Get the shot or take the ball and go home.
Any more of this needs to be discussed elsewhere.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
An interesting observation by Paul Noonan, which has also bothered me while watching LaFleur and Rodgers operate during a game.
Why are the Packers consistently snapping the ball with little to no seconds left on the play clock and how that affects the long passing game. Also the time outs used to prevent a delay of game penalty.
Here is his article;
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2021 ... n-research
Why are the Packers consistently snapping the ball with little to no seconds left on the play clock and how that affects the long passing game. Also the time outs used to prevent a delay of game penalty.
Here is his article;
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2021 ... n-research
Love is the answer…
Im fine with this. I would rather lose 5 games, easily win the division, and have almost EVERYONE back by playoffs, then have 3 losses, a top 1 or 2 seed and have a handful of guys out for the postseason because they reinjured themselves.kyle.mccarroll wrote: ↑08 Nov 2021 15:09It really feels like MLF is protecting everyone as much as they can for the stretch run this year. Especially considering how much of a lead we have in the division right now.
Sucks for the race in seeding, but I guess I won't argue with the results if weeks 14-18 mean we have Bak, Clark, JA, and Z all playing. Just hard to be patient right now.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur