Astro Photos, Astronomy and The Deep Space

Cheesy topics (like the Cheese Curds thread) go here. Topics that aren't Packer related will be moved here as well.

Mmmm.... cheese.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Astro Photos, Astronomy and The Deep Space

Post by GJPackerBacker »

Post your astrophotos, anything astronomy or maybe a theory of Dark Matter. I’ll get things started with an image of The Andromeda Galaxy. But first, some explanation as to how these images are obtained. Read on or just enjoy the photos….

An astrophotographer’s set up typically consists of a telescope, motorized focus, various optical filters (LRGB+), cooled camera, guiding camera, guiding mount and a very stable pier. This equipment is controlled by dedicated software. The quality of an image will be determined by how well the equipment is operated, the atmospheric conditions and the dark sky quality.

The imaging apparatus will gather exposures ranging roughly from 30s up to 600s and more. Very long exposures run the risk of introducing image artifacts due to poor tracking or even capturing a sat track (thanks Elon). Capturing exceptional detail requires patience, proper operation of the equipment and cooperation with the atmospheric conditions.

For high quality deep space images the total time integration of the images usually goes well over 10 hours. What this means is that the final image consists of many exposures stacked together. These images are sorted by optical filter for quality, registered and stacked by some fairly sophisticated software. The next step involves using a program like Photoshop to bring out details, provide brightness snd color balance. This last part of the image processing sometimes moves the results from scientific data to artistic expression!
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

Andromeda Galaxy
Andromeda Galaxy
9D9C8189-E2F1-4EAE-A6E4-A1F5AE4364DB.jpeg (945.24 KiB) Viewed 8362 times
Integration: 7.6 hours. The Andromeda Galaxy sometimes called M31. At a distance of 2.5M LY, it is part of our local galactic group. Look at the detail in the image. The blue regions of the image consist of younger short-lived, very hot, high mass. The red regions are dominated by older, cooler, low mass stars that have much longer lifespans. The dark areas that follow the spiral arms are dust lanes. The stars in the foreground of the image are from our own galaxy - The Milky Way.

If you’ve had the opportunity to see Andromeda with the naked eye or with low power optics it is obvious why up until the early 1900’s some astronomers thought M31 was a nebulosity. Try it!
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8286
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

That is so cool.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
Raptorman
Reactions:
Posts: 3573
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 19:39
Location: East coast of Florida

Post by Raptorman »

This morning they just launched a new telescope into space. I'm sure the pictures coming from it in the future will be amazing. 7 ft to 21 ft is huge.

From Wiki.
The primary mirror of JWST, the Optical Telescope Element, consists of 18 hexagonal mirror segments made of gold-plated beryllium which combine to create a 6.5 m (21 ft) diameter mirror – considerably larger than Hubble's 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) mirror.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Web ... _Telescope

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

NCF wrote:
25 Dec 2021 11:15
That is so cool.
Thanks. I’ll share more in the future.
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

Raptorman wrote:
25 Dec 2021 11:24
This morning they just launched a new telescope into space. I'm sure the pictures coming from it in the future will be amazing. 7 ft to 21 ft is huge.

From Wiki.
The primary mirror of JWST, the Optical Telescope Element, consists of 18 hexagonal mirror segments made of gold-plated beryllium which combine to create a 6.5 m (21 ft) diameter mirror – considerably larger than Hubble's 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) mirror.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Web ... _Telescope
Definitely looking forward to seeing the images generated by the JWST!!
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
texas
Reactions:
Posts: 3431
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 22:03

Post by texas »

So wait did you take this photo?

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

texas wrote:
25 Dec 2021 23:38
So wait did you take this photo?
Yes. I took the exposures for this image. I took the exposures about a year ago. There were a total of 93 individual images that were integrated to achieve the image. Since it was one of my early data sets, this data was processed with the assistance of someone who teaches astrophotography processing. He has taught me a lot about all the important steps, mostly in Photoshop. Here is a photo of the equipment used.
4” Stellarvue Set Up
4” Stellarvue Set Up
3E1ADC77-2B51-4AF1-B0BD-AB2631F244C3.jpeg (2.17 MiB) Viewed 8333 times
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
Raptorman
Reactions:
Posts: 3573
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 19:39
Location: East coast of Florida

Post by Raptorman »

GJPackerBacker wrote:
25 Dec 2021 12:31
Raptorman wrote:
25 Dec 2021 11:24
This morning they just launched a new telescope into space. I'm sure the pictures coming from it in the future will be amazing. 7 ft to 21 ft is huge.

From Wiki.
The primary mirror of JWST, the Optical Telescope Element, consists of 18 hexagonal mirror segments made of gold-plated beryllium which combine to create a 6.5 m (21 ft) diameter mirror – considerably larger than Hubble's 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) mirror.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Web ... _Telescope
Definitely looking forward to seeing the images generated by the JWST!!
I was thinking, "Hey, I'll wake up in the morning and see the launch." Well, I slept in. It's a good thing because the launch wasn't from FL but from French Guiana. Duh.

User avatar
texas
Reactions:
Posts: 3431
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 22:03

Post by texas »

GJPackerBacker wrote:
26 Dec 2021 13:32
texas wrote:
25 Dec 2021 23:38
So wait did you take this photo?
Yes. I took the exposures for this image. I took the exposures about a year ago. There were a total of 93 individual images that were integrated to achieve the image. Since it was one of my early data sets, this data was processed with the assistance of someone who teaches astrophotography processing. He has taught me a lot about all the important steps, mostly in Photoshop. Here is a photo of the equipment used. 3E1ADC77-2B51-4AF1-B0BD-AB2631F244C3.jpeg
That's pretty sweet

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 8199
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

Holy smokes. That is some cool stuff…and quite the setup!

User avatar
Raptorman
Reactions:
Posts: 3573
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 19:39
Location: East coast of Florida

Post by Raptorman »

Sorry, I just had too.
270207905_7155318347819566_8319190914520719720_n.jpg
270207905_7155318347819566_8319190914520719720_n.jpg (84.37 KiB) Viewed 8310 times

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

Raptorman wrote:
27 Dec 2021 07:59
Sorry, I just had too.

270207905_7155318347819566_8319190914520719720_n.jpg
:clap:

That’s funny. Especially following the major screw up on the Hubble mirror. The recovery from the Hubble mistake was one huge engineering success, in itself a great measure of human ingenuity.
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
salmar80
Reactions:
Posts: 4888
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:07

Post by salmar80 »

Dunno if this counts, but my first aurora borealis in Rovaniemi. Hoping to see some more spectacular ones.

Image
Image

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

salmar80 wrote:
27 Dec 2021 12:42
Dunno if this counts, but my first aurora borealis in Rovaniemi. Hoping to see some more spectacular ones.

Image
Keep on posting the aurora borealis images! Have you tried to video an AB? Have you ever seen an AB that varies in intensity and has some motion?
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
salmar80
Reactions:
Posts: 4888
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:07

Post by salmar80 »

GJPackerBacker wrote:
28 Dec 2021 17:12
Keep on posting the aurora borealis images! Have you tried to video an AB? Have you ever seen an AB that varies in intensity and has some motion?
I will. I did see real strong and moving ones in southern Finland years ago. About 99% chance I'll see some good ones up here, and will take a video when that happens. With weak aurora, the camera sees it better than the human eye that has gotten adjusted to the dark.The past week has been all cloudy, hoping cold days for clear skies.
Image

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

salmar80 wrote:
29 Dec 2021 09:08
GJPackerBacker wrote:
28 Dec 2021 17:12
Keep on posting the aurora borealis images! Have you tried to video an AB? Have you ever seen an AB that varies in intensity and has some motion?
I will. I did see real strong and moving ones in southern Finland years ago. About 99% chance I'll see some good ones up here, and will take a video when that happens. With weak aurora, the camera sees it better than the human eye that has gotten adjusted to the dark.The past week has been all cloudy, hoping cold days for clear skies.
This is on my bucket list. :aok:
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
Raptorman
Reactions:
Posts: 3573
Joined: 23 Mar 2020 19:39
Location: East coast of Florida

Post by Raptorman »

salmar80 wrote:
27 Dec 2021 12:42
Dunno if this counts, but my first aurora borealis in Rovaniemi. Hoping to see some more spectacular ones.

Image
Used to see them in WI at times in the winter. Really cool when they dance.

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

Objects captured by astrophotographers include: Aurora Borealis, meteor showers, planets, the sun, comets, nebulae, star clusters and galaxies. These are the major objects imaged. This list goes from near to far distances, which brings up an important discussion. The light we see from ABs reaches us nearly instantaneously. The light from the sun takes a little over 8 minutes to reach us. The light from Jupiter and Saturn takes hours to reach us. The light from Andromeda Galaxy, takes 2.5 million light years to reach us, so we say it is 2.5 million LY away. With such large distances involved the unit of LY becomes an important measuring stick.

This image of the Great Nebula in Orion was taken with my 6” refractor. Integration time: 1.3 hours. The nebulosity is located in our galaxy in the center of the sword below Orion’s Belt. This region of space, 1300 LY away is filled with gasses and dust. Prime conditions for a star nursery.
The Great Nebula in Orion (M42)
The Great Nebula in Orion (M42)
1A8A6D34-7444-4800-8A30-36C410F58962.jpeg (600.11 KiB) Viewed 8254 times
This nebulosity is visible to the naked eye. With the dark skies, say a few miles just outside of GB the faint object will look just like an extended fuzzy irregular ball of light. Let me know if you can see it. This should be real easy for Sal with the very dark skies he has.
GO PACK GO!!!

User avatar
GJPackerBacker
Reactions:
Posts: 1097
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 20:18

Post by GJPackerBacker »

These images were taken with a camera mounted on a tripod during the August 21, 2017 total solar eclipse. The images include: The Diamond Ring Effect, Stacked Coronal image and Total Eclipse Collage.
The Diamond Ring Effect
The Diamond Ring Effect
D921619C-B9E8-4ED3-A624-C9D33C8F1B9C.jpeg (189.74 KiB) Viewed 8239 times
Stacked Coronal Image
Stacked Coronal Image
3EA16BCB-B8EE-4925-8700-B2F5E088AF3A.jpeg (288.96 KiB) Viewed 8239 times
Solar Eclipse Collage
Solar Eclipse Collage
94B02759-0640-4E0C-BC44-7925CB80B7C6.jpeg (85.57 KiB) Viewed 8239 times
Enjoy!
GO PACK GO!!!

Post Reply