2022 Draft Discussion

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 11991
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

time to research my notes from the combine, I'd like to use a couple of our first four picks on a WR and a DT, maybe a TE, or a return specialist type guy.

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 12997
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

I love Jermain Johnson.

1. The dude absolutely takes over games and he is super versatile.

2. I want to see how yoop reacts when he begs for another WR and we draft Edge with our first pick again. :rotf:
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
salmar80
Reactions:
Posts: 4490
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:07

Post by salmar80 »

Scott4Pack wrote:
18 Mar 2022 07:45
salmar80 wrote:
18 Mar 2022 06:20
So, we now have a lot of picks. If Gutey wants to trade up, he has plenty ammo to do it. Gutey has shown he's willing to make moves to get the players he has targeted. On other hand, I tend to be a fan of a lot of bites at the apple, especially with a top heavy roster that needs the depth to be cheap

Here's some reference of what some combos could get us:

22nd + 28th should get us into top 10, 8th per the old trade value chart (TVC), 6th per 2022 Rich Hill chart. But trades involving top 10 picks tend to be funky, since exciting high picks have an impact on ticket sales for sucky teams

22nd + 53rd -> 13th (TVC), 11th (Hill)

28th + 60th -> 17th (TVC), 17th (Hill)

22nd + 92nd -> 18th (TVC), 17th (Hill)

28nd + 92nd -> 23rd (TVC), 23rd (Hill)
So since I'm a little analytical, I must now ask, how would it look if Guty trades BACK with any of those? You know, to take even more bites of the apple? It'll surely happen someplace in those first five picks, maybe even twice.

:-)
It can look like anything, since there are so many possible pick packages.

But as quick and dirty examples:

22nd pick -> KC's 30th and 94th
22nd pick -> ATL second rounders 43rd & 58th
22nd pick -> NYJ 38th & 69th

28th pick -> BAL 45th & 76th
Image

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 11991
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

go pak go wrote:
18 Mar 2022 07:58
I love Jermain Johnson.

1. The dude absolutely takes over games and he is super versatile.

2. I want to see how yoop reacts when he begs for another WR and we draft Edge with our first pick again. :rotf:
ballistic :lol: but I don't think I'll have to worry about that, actually I expect to bring in another edge rusher, but likely a later round pick or maybe a UFA like we did with Mercillus

rather then spend a first at edge, I'd rather a DT, we need pass rush help there too.

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

Hope for his sake its nothing serious.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13584
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Scott4Pack wrote:
18 Mar 2022 07:45
salmar80 wrote:
18 Mar 2022 06:20
So, we now have a lot of picks. If Gutey wants to trade up, he has plenty ammo to do it. Gutey has shown he's willing to make moves to get the players he has targeted. On other hand, I tend to be a fan of a lot of bites at the apple, especially with a top heavy roster that needs the depth to be cheap

Here's some reference of what some combos could get us:

22nd + 28th should get us into top 10, 8th per the old trade value chart (TVC), 6th per 2022 Rich Hill chart. But trades involving top 10 picks tend to be funky, since exciting high picks have an impact on ticket sales for sucky teams

22nd + 53rd -> 13th (TVC), 11th (Hill)

28th + 60th -> 17th (TVC), 17th (Hill)

22nd + 92nd -> 18th (TVC), 17th (Hill)

28nd + 92nd -> 23rd (TVC), 23rd (Hill)
So since I'm a little analytical, I must now ask, how would it look if Guty trades BACK with any of those? You know, to take even more bites of the apple? It'll surely happen someplace in those first five picks, maybe even twice.

:-)
Knock yourself out. I made a trade value calculator for our group mock drafts, finally got comp picks and updated it. ;)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
image.png
image.png (49.95 KiB) Viewed 506 times
Image

Image

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 7624
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

Image

Realist
Reactions:
Posts: 686
Joined: 12 Sep 2021 17:32

Post by Realist »

go pak go wrote:
18 Mar 2022 07:58
I love Jermain Johnson.

1. The dude absolutely takes over games and he is super versatile.

2. I want to see how yoop reacts when he begs for another WR and we draft Edge with our first pick again. :rotf:
We would have to trade up to get Johnson I think. Thankfully Adams turned down more money from us to go to Vegas. Saved management from themselves.

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13584
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Here's trade I could live with. Not picking up a '23 first, but picking up a '23 2nd from Houston which very well should be a top 40 pick.

Say if Houston doesn't take a QB at pick 3 then finally get a little QB hungry there. Be a nice way to spread some of the picks around between this year and next.
image.png
image.png (40.28 KiB) Viewed 461 times
Image

Image

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

BF004 wrote:
18 Mar 2022 14:32
Here's trade I could live with. Not picking up a '23 first, but picking up a '23 2nd from Houston which very well should be a top 40 pick.

Say if Houston doesn't take a QB at pick 3 then finally get a little QB hungry there. Be a nice way to spread some of the picks around between this year and next.

image.png
Keep that other 7th. I want to make sure we draft Mike Vrabel's kid.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

Qbs in this year's draft have to feel like crap. No one seems to want them. No idea who's going to go where.
Image
RIP JustJeff

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9857
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

I think the kid from Liberty has potential to be a good QB. Maybe not of the highest caliber, but I would put his ceiling at much higher than Jalen Hurts.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

Drj820 wrote:
18 Mar 2022 21:50
I think the kid from Liberty has potential to be a good QB. Maybe not of the highest caliber, but I would put his ceiling at much higher than Jalen Hurts.
He very well may be the first QB picked. But he's also the one that seems to need to sit the most, from what I've read. I think he's a likely target for Houston, Minnesota, Atlanta, and Carolina.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13584
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

I mean if he happens to fall to 53, I’d jump all over him.

Image

Image

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13584
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

BF004 wrote:
18 Mar 2022 11:19
Scott4Pack wrote:
18 Mar 2022 07:45
salmar80 wrote:
18 Mar 2022 06:20
So, we now have a lot of picks. If Gutey wants to trade up, he has plenty ammo to do it. Gutey has shown he's willing to make moves to get the players he has targeted. On other hand, I tend to be a fan of a lot of bites at the apple, especially with a top heavy roster that needs the depth to be cheap

Here's some reference of what some combos could get us:

22nd + 28th should get us into top 10, 8th per the old trade value chart (TVC), 6th per 2022 Rich Hill chart. But trades involving top 10 picks tend to be funky, since exciting high picks have an impact on ticket sales for sucky teams

22nd + 53rd -> 13th (TVC), 11th (Hill)

28th + 60th -> 17th (TVC), 17th (Hill)

22nd + 92nd -> 18th (TVC), 17th (Hill)

28nd + 92nd -> 23rd (TVC), 23rd (Hill)
So since I'm a little analytical, I must now ask, how would it look if Guty trades BACK with any of those? You know, to take even more bites of the apple? It'll surely happen someplace in those first five picks, maybe even twice.

:-)
Knock yourself out. I made a trade value calculator for our group mock drafts, finally got comp picks and updated it. ;)

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

image.png


Whoops, I had the wrong permission levels, now everyone can play with it. Just try not to break it. :P

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
Image

Image

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9857
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

No way GM Rodgers allows Assistant GM Gutekunst to escape the 1st round without drafting a WR. GM Rodgers could even double dip at WR. It’s a very high need. The current squad is the level that can prevent a SB win.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 11991
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

Drj820 wrote:
19 Mar 2022 13:15
No way GM Rodgers allows Assistant GM Gutekunst to escape the 1st round without drafting a WR. GM Rodgers could even double dip at WR. It’s a very high need. The current squad is the level that can prevent a SB win.
people need to respect there limitations, and when looking at the receivers Gute has drafted he should limit himself to picking CB's, OL, and gator aid distribution specialist :rotf: whoops I guess I should add in RB's that hit like pre live ball fullbacks, the rest like WR's should come with Rodgers approval, or at least give Dianna a call to see what she thinks :lol:

Drj820
Reactions:
Posts: 9857
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

Yoop wrote:
19 Mar 2022 13:37
Drj820 wrote:
19 Mar 2022 13:15
No way GM Rodgers allows Assistant GM Gutekunst to escape the 1st round without drafting a WR. GM Rodgers could even double dip at WR. It’s a very high need. The current squad is the level that can prevent a SB win.
people need to respect there limitations, and when looking at the receivers Gute has drafted he should limit himself to picking CB's, OL, and gator aid distribution specialist :rotf: whoops I guess I should add in RB's that hit like pre live ball fullbacks, the rest like WR's should come with Rodgers approval, or at least give Dianna a call to see what she thinks :lol:
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
Foosball
Reactions:
Posts: 411
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 10:47
Location: 2203 miles from Lambeau Field

Post by Foosball »

Would you trade 2 1st round picks, one now and one in 2023 for DK Metcalf?…just asking for a friend.
Love is the answer…

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13584
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Foosball wrote:
21 Mar 2022 16:05
Would you trade 2 1st round picks, one now and one in 2023 for DK Metcalf?…just asking for a friend.
I wouldn't.

He'd be kind of cheap this year, then essentially demand Davante Adams money next offseason.
Image

Image

Post Reply