why you think Rodgers and the Packers losing PO games translates to " NOT ALL IN" is mind boggling.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑23 Mar 2022 20:49Surprising statistic ......... but not a surprising reality (just ask Realist or Skeptic if you don't believe me). Look who has been quarterbacking and coaching those teams. Look who has not been "ALL IN" all these years. The coaching and play calling has only been mildly innovative. And the QB is the QB (kind of like the Browns are the Browns).
during regular season we know Rodgers by extension McCarthy are risk adverse, now doesn't that magnify during PO games? if there is any one thing that stands out, it is that McCarthy became ultra conservative in the PO's and Rodgers has carried that trait his whole career
2020 though Rodgers seemed to brake those habits, was spreading the ball around, problem was the receivers dropped key passes, and KIng couldn't cover, it's easy to blame Rodgers.
even the best QB's need quality receivers, if we watch teams this year scrambling to pay to get the best UFA WR's that should speak loudly to our deficient WR room the last 5 years, if who we've carried was sufficient, then teams wouldn't spend all that money in hopes of improving upon the already better talent they have.
imo " the not all in culprit" has been our FO, should have brought in better WR talent years ago