Packers Sign Sammy Watkins

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

User avatar
Captain_Ben
Reactions:
Posts: 1386
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 16:27
Location: California

Post by Captain_Ben »

He was a stud about 5 or 6 years ago. Haven't been following him much since. Seems like a good acquisition.

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

BF004 wrote:
14 Apr 2022 12:19
A little interesting Sammy. Just given Lafleur coached with both Fuller and Julio.

I guess Will Fuller would be further removed, but playing on Shanahans O and then in Tennessee, gotta think Julio would pick up the playbook the quickest.
Ok. Totally forgot LaFleur and Sammy were with the Rams together in 2017.


Matty’s been around the block already. :lol:
Image

Image

User avatar
go pak go
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13518
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

wallyuwl wrote:
14 Apr 2022 18:03
go pak go wrote:
14 Apr 2022 15:56
All that being said. I don't want to spend a 1st on a WR so if Jones helps us not have to do that.

Then good deal. :aok:
Don't think this signing effects the draft in any way. He might not even make the 53 (though probably about 90% he does).

Overall a decent signing. I hope there isn't too much guaranteed money and the majority of even the $4 million is incentives.
I never implied this signing (Watkins) had anything to do with the draft.

I never have. I don't see view the draft as immediate help.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

TheSkeptic wrote:
15 Apr 2022 09:54
Now that Watkins is signed and will be the WR#1 starter, the remaining problem is the slot. Cobb is old and has lost whatever quickness he once had and can't stay healthy. Amari Rodgers never had good quickness or speed. So, is the strategy now to draft Burks and let him start in the slot on Day 1?

Or, should Lazard gain 10 pounds and play TE and Burks start at WR#2.
I disagree with almost every single aspect of this post

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 8236
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

YoHoChecko wrote:
15 Apr 2022 11:28
TheSkeptic wrote:
15 Apr 2022 09:54
Now that Watkins is signed and will be the WR#1 starter, the remaining problem is the slot. Cobb is old and has lost whatever quickness he once had and can't stay healthy. Amari Rodgers never had good quickness or speed. So, is the strategy now to draft Burks and let him start in the slot on Day 1?

Or, should Lazard gain 10 pounds and play TE and Burks start at WR#2.
I disagree with almost every single aspect of this post
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I wasn't gonna say it, but, yeah....

User avatar
Crazylegs Starks
Reactions:
Posts: 3737
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
Location: Northern WI

Post by Crazylegs Starks »

APB wrote:
15 Apr 2022 05:54
Crazylegs Starks wrote:
14 Apr 2022 16:50
Good signing! Hopefully Watkins works out better than Devin Funchess did :lol:
They gave him the same roster number. :hide:
Image
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 4177
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

Crazylegs Starks wrote:
15 Apr 2022 12:22
APB wrote:
15 Apr 2022 05:54
Crazylegs Starks wrote:
14 Apr 2022 16:50
Good signing! Hopefully Watkins works out better than Devin Funchess did :lol:
They gave him the same roster number. :hide:
Image
Funchess-A !! :thwap:

From 2017: Through 1938, two guards (Walt McGaw and Wes Carlson), one tackle (Leo Katalinas), one end (Bernie Scherer and three backs (Al Bloodgood, Red Dunn and Roger Grove) wore number 11 for Green Bay. Then there was a 31-year gap until the next Packer donned the number, quarterback Rick Norton for one game in 1970.

Since 1970, 11 has been worn by three other quarterbacks (Alan Risher, Ty Detmer and Matt Hasselbeck), four punters Steve Broussard, David Beverly, Joe Prokop and B.J. Sander), one kicker (Eddie Garcia) and, more recently, two wideouts (Jarrett Boykin and Trevor Davis). Risher was a replacement player; Broussard is famous for having three punts blocked in one game, the first game of his four-game tenure in Green and Gold; Beverly wore the number for six years, longer than any other Packer, and was the most prolific punter in team history.

90 years on, Red Dunn remains the greatest Packer ever to wear 11.

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

RingoCStarrQB wrote:
16 Apr 2022 07:30
Ty Detmer
Me at lambeau a few years back :P

Image

Image

User avatar
go pak go
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13518
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

Yes!!!

I have this guys's game worn jersey. I now have a #11 to support!!

Image
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13518
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

BF004 wrote:
16 Apr 2022 08:24
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
16 Apr 2022 07:30
Ty Detmer
Me at lambeau a few years back :P

I love how Twitter connects fans to players.

One of the really cool aspects of social media.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Pugger
Reactions:
Posts: 4776
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 18:34
Location: Punta Gorda, FL

Post by Pugger »

BF004 wrote:
16 Apr 2022 08:24
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
16 Apr 2022 07:30
Ty Detmer
Me at lambeau a few years back :P

Nice! Too bad we can't see your face.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8300
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Looks good.

Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

Nice deal.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14477
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

That is really the right price!
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

Drj820
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 10108
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 12:34

Post by Drj820 »

The price reflects Sammys market and what the league thinks of him.

I am thrilled to get Sammy at that price point, and I think its a no brainer to bring him in at the price.

But the price indicated expectations should be tempered.

I hope he revamps his market like Campbell did in GB and its a win win for everyone!
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur

User avatar
Pckfn23
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 14477
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

The price doesn't foreshadow what he will do in 2022 either... I personally don't know what expectations everyone has, but I don't suspect many think he is going to be a Davante Adams #1. I think my own expectations are sufficiently tempered by expecting a high end #2.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

I expect 13-14 games, 55-75 catches for 750 to 1100 yards.

That’s obviously on the high side of the range of reasonable/realistic expectations.

That reflects my personal view of why this was a good bargain signing.

User avatar
Yoop
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 12354
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

If we get 500 yrds from Watkins this year, we'll be fortunate, If Sammy stretches the defense which allows others to have success he'll have earned his 4 mil. thats all I want out of Watkins.
Last edited by Yoop on 19 Apr 2022 11:40, edited 1 time in total.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

Yoop wrote:
19 Apr 2022 11:13
doesn't matter what Watson does, imo the Watson signing should have zero emphasis on this draft, we can't count on Watson for anything, he is a bonus player signed to help while the rookies mature, we should still do all we can to sign the most ready to play receiver we can from this class.
I’m gonna go ahead and say that it matters a great deal to this team what Sammy Watkins does this year.

And also that this, the thread about Sammy Watkins getting signed, is the right place to discuss what he might do, with no mention of how it impacts the draft, which has several threads devoted to it

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 4177
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

Yoop wrote:
19 Apr 2022 11:13
If we get 500 yrds from Watkins this year, we'll be fortunate, If Sammy stretches the defense which allows others to have success he'll have earned his 4 mil. thats all I want out of Watkins.
Interestingly........John Jefferson made the Pro Bowl for the Packers averaging about 3-4 catches a game. If Sammy Watkins can at least give us JJ performances, that should be enough. But then again where is our Lofton, Sharpe, Brooks, Freeman, Driver, Nelson or Adams?

Post Reply