Packers 2022 Big Board #11

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Post Reply

#11 on

George Karlaftis - EDGE - Purdue
3
8%
Garrett Wilson - WR - Ohio State
5
13%
Jermaine Johnson II - EDGE - Florida State
2
5%
Chris Olave - WR - Ohio State
3
8%
Treylon Burks - WR - Arkansas
2
5%
Drake London - WR - USC
7
18%
Tyler Linderbaum - OC - Iowa
0
No votes
Devonte Wyatt - DL3T - Georgia
1
3%
Jameson Williams - WR - Alabama
7
18%
Trevor Penning - OT - Northern Iowa
3
8%
Trent McDuffie - CB - Washington
2
5%
Devin Lloyd - ILB - Utah
0
No votes
DeMarvin Leal - DL5T - Texas A&M
0
No votes
Andrew Booth Jr. - CB - Clemson
0
No votes
Daxton Hill - S - Michigan
2
5%
Roger McCreary - CB - Auburn
0
No votes
Kenyon Green - OG - Texas A&M
1
3%
Kaiir Elam - CB - Florida
0
No votes
Nakobe Dean - ILB - Georgia
1
3%
Lewis Cine - S - Georgia
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 39

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Packers 2022 Big Board #11

Post by BF004 »

Vote for your Packers specific big board, consider needs and historical team trends.

Vote for a few people, hopefully, especially at the top, we can pull off a handful of guys per poll, finding top tiers or whatever.



2022 Packers Big Board
1. Aidan Hutchinson - EDGE - Michigan
2. Travon Walker - EDGE - Georgia
3. Kayvon Thibodeaux - EDGE - Oregon
4. Evan Neal - OT - Alabama
5. Ikem Ekwonu - OT - North Carolina State
6. Kyle Hamilton - S - Notre Dame
7. Jordan Davis - DL1T - Georgia
8. Ahmad Gardner - CB - Cincinnati
9. Derek Stingley - CB - LSU
10. Charles Cross - OT - Mississippi State
Image

Image

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

This should be when it starts getting more fun here.
Image

Image

User avatar
Packfntk
Reactions:
Posts: 1759
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 14:09

Post by Packfntk »

Can't believe I am the only vote for Dean. Stud.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Packfntk wrote:
22 Apr 2022 10:44
Can't believe I am the only vote for Dean. Stud.
Meh, Packer specific ranking here, both built on need, positional importance, and our historical traits.

A short, undersized, inside linebacker. Doesn't check any of those three boxes above.
Image

Image

Realist
Reactions:
Posts: 686
Joined: 12 Sep 2021 17:32

Post by Realist »

BF004 wrote:
22 Apr 2022 10:50
Packfntk wrote:
22 Apr 2022 10:44
Can't believe I am the only vote for Dean. Stud.
Meh, Packer specific ranking here, both built on need, positional importance, and our historical traits.

A short, undersized, inside linebacker. Doesn't check any of those three boxes above.
Maybe it's time for a change bf'er? So tired of hearing the Packers only draft players that have to check their imaginary boxes.

User avatar
BF004
Huddle Heavy Hitter
Reactions:
Posts: 13862
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

Realist wrote:
22 Apr 2022 11:02
BF004 wrote:
22 Apr 2022 10:50
Packfntk wrote:
22 Apr 2022 10:44
Can't believe I am the only vote for Dean. Stud.
Meh, Packer specific ranking here, both built on need, positional importance, and our historical traits.

A short, undersized, inside linebacker. Doesn't check any of those three boxes above.
Maybe it's time for a change bf'er? So tired of hearing the Packers only draft players that have to check their imaginary boxes.
I think Gute has been breaking it moreso than his predecessor (guys like Jaire and Amari Rodgers, etc.).

But clear he really likes big length on the OL and front 7.


However, a bigger ILB is more a 3-4 thing than a Packer thing.


But yeah, I just don't think an undersized off ball LB is going to be too high on our radar this year. I could be wrong, I often am, but I hope I'm right this year. If for no other reason that I'd have to ban half the forum and lock 200 threads if GM Packfntk trades up for an ILB when guys like London, Wilson, Olave and Williams are all on the board.
Image

Image

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

BF004 wrote:
22 Apr 2022 11:13
But yeah, I just don't think an undersized off ball LB is going to be too high on our radar this year. I could be wrong, I often am, but I hope I'm right this year. If for no other reason that I'd have to ban half the forum and lock 200 threads if GM Packfntk trades up for an ILB when guys like London, Wilson, Olave and Williams are all on the board.
That’s how I’m feeling about trading up for Jordan Davis :lol: :mrgreen:

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8293
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

I still don't really want to trade up for anyone. Everyone is kind of in one big blob. I would rather have a few cracks at a couple of guys.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9712
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

NCF wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:38
I still don't really want to trade up for anyone. Everyone is kind of in one big blob. I would rather have a few cracks at a couple of guys.
I generally never want to trade up, but I’m definitely fine with multiple moves to maximize draft capital and value that still leave us with some excess picks.

Like trading 22 and 59 for 14; but also trading 28 to Houston for 37, 108, and 109…

Things like that.

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

YoHoChecko wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:51
NCF wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:38
I still don't really want to trade up for anyone. Everyone is kind of in one big blob. I would rather have a few cracks at a couple of guys.
I generally never want to trade up, but I’m definitely fine with multiple moves to maximize draft capital and value that still leave us with some excess picks.

Like trading 22 and 59 for 14; but also trading 28 to Houston for 37, 108, and 109…

Things like that.
I'm leaning on wanting to keep 22 and 28 and trade 53 or 59 and 92 something in the early 40's.
Image
RIP JustJeff

User avatar
salmar80
Reactions:
Posts: 4895
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:07

Post by salmar80 »

YoHoChecko wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:51
NCF wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:38
I still don't really want to trade up for anyone. Everyone is kind of in one big blob. I would rather have a few cracks at a couple of guys.
I generally never want to trade up, but I’m definitely fine with multiple moves to maximize draft capital and value that still leave us with some excess picks.

Like trading 22 and 59 for 14; but also trading 28 to Houston for 37, 108, and 109…

Things like that.
Yeah, getting the feeling there are about 10 prospect in top tier, and if some fall due to QB needs etc, we could take take advantage of it by trading up. After that, it's pick where you are or take advantage of a deep draft by trading down.
Image

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8293
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

YoHoChecko wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:51
NCF wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:38
I still don't really want to trade up for anyone. Everyone is kind of in one big blob. I would rather have a few cracks at a couple of guys.
I generally never want to trade up, but I’m definitely fine with multiple moves to maximize draft capital and value that still leave us with some excess picks.

Like trading 22 and 59 for 14; but also trading 28 to Houston for 37, 108, and 109…

Things like that.
I have settled on two ideal trades (pending the board, of course) that I think put the Packers exactly where I want them. At 22, no WR worth taking, flip to NYJ for 35+69. Then, in Round 2, flip 53+92 for 41 with SEA. Leaves us with 28, 35, 41, 59, & 69. Definitely will lose out on higher end options from 22-27, but eliminates that dead zone between 28 and 53 and gives us two shots at guys in the higher end of that range. Also gives us one last shot at a top-100 guy that we really like by moving us up over 20 picks in Round 3.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
paco
Reactions:
Posts: 6718
Joined: 18 Mar 2020 15:29
Location: Janesville, WI

Post by paco »

NCF wrote:
22 Apr 2022 15:21
YoHoChecko wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:51
NCF wrote:
22 Apr 2022 13:38
I still don't really want to trade up for anyone. Everyone is kind of in one big blob. I would rather have a few cracks at a couple of guys.
I generally never want to trade up, but I’m definitely fine with multiple moves to maximize draft capital and value that still leave us with some excess picks.

Like trading 22 and 59 for 14; but also trading 28 to Houston for 37, 108, and 109…

Things like that.
I have settled on two ideal trades (pending the board, of course) that I think put the Packers exactly where I want them. At 22, no WR worth taking, flip to NYJ for 35+69. Then, in Round 2, flip 53+92 for 41 with SEA. Leaves us with 28, 35, 41, 59, & 69. Definitely will lose out on higher end options from 22-27, but eliminates that dead zone between 28 and 53 and gives us two shots at guys in the higher end of that range. Also gives us one last shot at a top-100 guy that we really like by moving us up over 20 picks in Round 3.
Might just steal this for my final mock.
Image
RIP JustJeff

Post Reply