Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
Rank the Roster 2022: #29 Runoff
Back to back runoffs, Love vs Slaton in the 4th runoff this year
- Crazylegs Starks
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3719
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
- Location: Northern WI
What if we have a tie for the run-off? Will the forum collapse in on itself in a magnificent implosion?
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi
- Vince Lombardi
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
We might find out. Currently there is a 4-4 tie.Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 12:18What if we have a tie for the run-off? Will the forum collapse in on itself in a magnificent implosion?
well we've endured several minny explosions in the past, I caused all of them, so you might say the place is Yoop proofCrazylegs Starks wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 12:18What if we have a tie for the run-off? Will the forum collapse in on itself in a magnificent implosion?
I expect Waldo will award both players with this slot and the season will define who was the more deserving, either that or someone will change there vote prior to the hammer falling
It's embarrassing that it has gotten to this point in this vote. Stop it, the Slaton madness has gone far enough.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
None of us knows what that means.
Read More. Post Less.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
Yes, we do. We all know it has nothing to do with the 4th or 5th player at a position where normally only 2 play. It is about not liking Love. It is about giving Rodgers weapons and not wasting a 1st round pick on a QB, and then going with an UDFA QB when Rodgers does really get hurt or retires, still having won only 1 SB.
OK, if you say so. I still don't know if he voted for Love or Slaton from his post.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 15:14Yes, we do. We all know it has nothing to do with the 4th or 5th player at a position where normally only 2 play. It is about not liking Love. It is about giving Rodgers weapons and not wasting a 1st round pick on a QB, and then going with an UDFA QB when Rodgers does really get hurt or retires, still having won only 1 SB.
Read More. Post Less.
Love, I am not a monster.NCF wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 15:16OK, if you say so. I still don't know if he voted for Love or Slaton from his post.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑11 Jul 2022 15:14Yes, we do. We all know it has nothing to do with the 4th or 5th player at a position where normally only 2 play. It is about not liking Love. It is about giving Rodgers weapons and not wasting a 1st round pick on a QB, and then going with an UDFA QB when Rodgers does really get hurt or retires, still having won only 1 SB.
Wisconsin Cheese Is Better Than California Cheese!
Teeeeeeeeej.
But I will also kinda welcome not having to argue over Love needing to be ranked.
But I will also kinda welcome not having to argue over Love needing to be ranked.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
Oh come on, years ago even the punter was fair game, and it was only last year when Crosby was finally ditched. The backup QB deserves to be ranked.
I couldn’t bring myself to vote for Love…and now I’ve gone and tied it up at 7. Not sorry.
That's funny, I had switched to Love so we could get him off the board. Looks like Teej wins even w/o my vote.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
i cant say i feel sorry for him because he has become a multimillionaire while only starting one game in the NFL. Not a bad deal for him.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
unless a QB starts in first 2 years, they suck and where over drafted according to some
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
I don’t think love sucks because he doesn’t start for the packers. I think he sucks because what I have seen him do on the field in practice and in games with my own eyes...well, sucks.Yoop wrote: ↑12 Jul 2022 16:04unless a QB starts in first 2 years, they suck and where over drafted according to some
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
“Sucks” is not a permanent label. One can improve and graduate from suckdom status. It’s rare, but possible.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
As I have said b4. Love played in a weak conference and really wasn't good enough given the competition to be drafted where he was. Saying he sucks is unfair. He is exactly what he is. Not a starting nfl qb. Not his fault.Drj820 wrote: ↑12 Jul 2022 17:47I don’t think love sucks because he doesn’t start for the packers. I think he sucks because what I have seen him do on the field in practice and in games with my own eyes...well, sucks.Yoop wrote: ↑12 Jul 2022 16:04unless a QB starts in first 2 years, they suck and where over drafted according to some
in reality most QB's suck and where over drafted, why? cause teams don't take the time to develop QB's, it's expensive, time, and roster spot consuming, if ya use a first round pick fans will expect him to start quickly, and while you can find a good one in later rounds, it's not as likely.
it is about money, we'll spend 3 to 4 mil grooming Love, and if he duds out it could have a reflection on the Gute for moving up to take him, but I'd Rather spend what is small potatoes compared to buying one, and again it's to tough a call at this stage to know how good Love will become, you people belong to that first group that expects that if a QB isn't starting year two there never going to be any good, and that is so lame.
“Sucks” is not a permanent label. One can improve and graduate from suckdom status. It’s rare, but possible.