Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2022

[texas]

That's nuts. USC and UCLA pretty much are the PAC-12. Plus CA teams in the Big 10? Doesn't make much sense.

[Captain_Ben]

I don't understand why the national consensus treats QBs like Baker Mayfield, Jalen Hurts, Mariota, etc as if they are actually viable QBs. They all sucked and it was obvious from day 1. PFT talking about a massive extension for Jalen Hurts, as if he were a competent franchise QB and not just a guy they drafted to be an upper-tier backup to a QB who at the time was MVP-caliber.

I don't understand the charade, like I didn't understand it for Baker Mayfield and a bunch of other guys. They all go on about Hurts being a franchise guy and everybody just pretends like it's okay. Well, it's not okay. I'm not going to sit here and be gaslit!

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... act-scale/

If it's any consolation, I don't think you're alone. Check out that comment section.

[NCF]

I don't understand why the national consensus treats QBs like Baker Mayfield, Jalen Hurts, Mariota, etc as if they are actually viable QBs. They all sucked and it was obvious from day 1. PFT talking about a massive extension for Jalen Hurts, as if he were a competent franchise QB and not just a guy they drafted to be an upper-tier backup to a QB who at the time was MVP-caliber.

I don't understand the charade, like I didn't understand it for Baker Mayfield and a bunch of other guys. They all go on about Hurts being a franchise guy and everybody just pretends like it's okay. Well, it's not okay. I'm not going to sit here and be gaslit!

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... act-scale/

If it's any consolation, I don't think you're alone. Check out that comment section.

Really? Negative comments? I’m shocked.

[Captain_Ben]

I don't understand why the national consensus treats QBs like Baker Mayfield, Jalen Hurts, Mariota, etc as if they are actually viable QBs. They all sucked and it was obvious from day 1. PFT talking about a massive extension for Jalen Hurts, as if he were a competent franchise QB and not just a guy they drafted to be an upper-tier backup to a QB who at the time was MVP-caliber.

I don't understand the charade, like I didn't understand it for Baker Mayfield and a bunch of other guys. They all go on about Hurts being a franchise guy and everybody just pretends like it's okay. Well, it's not okay. I'm not going to sit here and be gaslit!

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... act-scale/

If it's any consolation, I don't think you're alone. Check out that comment section.

Really? Negative comments? I’m shocked.

So what is your point? That Hurts deserves that much money?

[NCF]

So what is your point? That Hurts deserves that much money?

No, just that the PFT comments section isn't worth the digital space it takes up.

[NCF]

[Captain_Ben]

Seems like the Panthers are becoming the kings of NFL QB sloppy seconds. But glad for Baker, hope it works out for him.

[BF004]

How it started



How it’s going

[lupedafiasco]

I think Baker is an average QB but that’s a steal for the Panthers. With the pieces they have on offense he should do well. Not top 10 probably but getting him for a conditional 4/5 is well in the Panthers favor.

[Realist]

Seems like the Panthers are becoming the kings of NFL QB sloppy seconds. But glad for Baker, hope it works out for him.

I always liked him. One year tryout b4 free agency. I hope he kills it. Do his commercials still air? I liked those as well but I couldn't tell u what product he was pitching.

[BF004]

[paco]

That's a lot of money per foot of QB.

[APB]

Gotta love that dude…

[Drj820]

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

[BF004]

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

[NCF]

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

[BF004]

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

[Realist]

Cardinals will regret paying little kyler that much money.

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lamar- ... yoff-stats
I wouldn't want Jackson on a big extension. Make him a pocket passer and he is less than pedestrian.

[BF004]

Maybe, but a lot of teams are about to regret spending that much money. It's becoming the going rate. Just wait until Lamar breaks $50M/per.

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lamar- ... yoff-stats
I wouldn't want Jackson on a big extension. Make him a pocket passer and he is less than pedestrian.

He is actually very solid on many many advanced passing metrics. He does not have a good offense around him, scrubs at RB last year (due to injury), poor WR's throughout his career, likely a worse WR room this year than the Packers. He actually is a very good pocket passer, accurate, and actually does a really good job going through his progressions and not just running.

[Realist]

Yeah, was gunna comment on him, he is by far the best of the lot and honestly by all accounts the real deal off the field too.

55-60.

And yeah, that is just the going rate. Strike gold with a rookie or go without a competent QB if you aren't willing to pay.

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lamar- ... yoff-stats
I wouldn't want Jackson on a big extension. Make him a pocket passer and he is less than pedestrian.

He is actually very solid on many many advanced passing metrics. He does not have a good offense around him, scrubs at RB last year (due to injury), poor WR's throughout his career, likely a worse WR room this year than the Packers. He actually is a very good pocket passer, accurate, and actually does a really good job going through his progressions and not just running.

I trust ur opinion but the eye test tells me I don't think Jackson or Murray are quarterbacks I would want. On rookie deals? Yes. Building around them on a massive deal? No.