Packers Huddle

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

Pugger wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 08:05

German_Panzer wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2023 23:41

Still I could see him continuing. I do not see decline. But in TB?

Glad for MM. He proves he‘s a real deal.

After watching his post game presser he's done in Tampa. It will be interesting to see where he ends up. If I were in his shoes I'd go to Miami. The climate is even warmer and they have more talent over there than the Bucs.

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

The only team I can think of that possibly fits that mold is SF. But who knows, Brock may end up being the real deal.

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 15:59

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

Pugger wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 08:05

After watching his post game presser he's done in Tampa. It will be interesting to see where he ends up. If I were in his shoes I'd go to Miami. The climate is even warmer and they have more talent over there than the Bucs.

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

The only team I can think of that possibly fits that mold is SF. But who knows, Brock may end up being the real deal.

Doubt he’d go to the jets but they fit the bill.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 16:06

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 15:59

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

The only team I can think of that possibly fits that mold is SF. But who knows, Brock may end up being the real deal.

Doubt he’d go to the jets but they fit the bill.

Yeah. I think the Jets is the perfect team for Aaron Rodgers honestly.

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 15:59

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

Pugger wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 08:05

After watching his post game presser he's done in Tampa. It will be interesting to see where he ends up. If I were in his shoes I'd go to Miami. The climate is even warmer and they have more talent over there than the Bucs.

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

The only team I can think of that possibly fits that mold is SF. But who knows, Brock may end up being the real deal.

SF? No. They have a QB problem but its one in which they have to many QB's to choose from. Although, I get the feeling Trey Lance is going to be a bust.

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 14:49

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

Pugger wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 08:05

After watching his post game presser he's done in Tampa. It will be interesting to see where he ends up. If I were in his shoes I'd go to Miami. The climate is even warmer and they have more talent over there than the Bucs.

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

Oh. Not Green Bay? (I set you up pretty well there, didn’t I?)

But in all seriousness, how about the Rams (on the long shot that Stafford retires)?

Pretty sure the Rams will be in a rebuild mode this coming year.

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 17:06

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 15:59

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

The only team I can think of that possibly fits that mold is SF. But who knows, Brock may end up being the real deal.

SF? No. They have a QB problem but its one in which they have to many QB's to choose from. Although, I get the feeling Trey Lance is going to be a bust.

Does a 46 year old Tom Brady give that roster a better chance to win it all than Purdy, Lance, or Garappolo? I don't know. Maybe.

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 18:22

Does a 46 year old Tom Brady give that roster a better chance to win it all than Purdy, Lance, or Garappolo? I don't know. Maybe.

So much so. Every loss I can think of that SF has suffered in about the last three seasons concludes with a QB with a deer-in-the-headlights look on his face.

NCF wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 08:17

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 18:22

Does a 46 year old Tom Brady give that roster a better chance to win it all than Purdy, Lance, or Garappolo? I don't know. Maybe.

So much so. Every loss I can think of that SF has suffered in about the last three seasons concludes with a QB with a deer-in-the-headlights look on his face.

my impression too, which I figured would happen with Purdy, and may happen still, but he seemed pretty confident the way he played Saturday.

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 09:18

NCF wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 08:17

Captain_Ben wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 18:22

Does a 46 year old Tom Brady give that roster a better chance to win it all than Purdy, Lance, or Garappolo? I don't know. Maybe.

So much so. Every loss I can think of that SF has suffered in about the last three seasons concludes with a QB with a deer-in-the-headlights look on his face.

my impression too, which I figured would happen with Purdy, and may happen still, but he seemed pretty confident the way he played Saturday.

Not hard to be confident against geno smith and the seahawks. It all depends on how the path to the super bowl develops...I could see him being confident against danny jones and the giants if they were to beat philly (very possible imo), but I could see him having a tough time on the road in Philly.

And even if he goes all the way to the championship like Jimmy G did once before...I could see a matchup against Mahommes, Burrow, or Allen making that backside a little tight. Lot of ball game left.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 09:23

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 09:18

NCF wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 08:17

So much so. Every loss I can think of that SF has suffered in about the last three seasons concludes with a QB with a deer-in-the-headlights look on his face.

my impression too, which I figured would happen with Purdy, and may happen still, but he seemed pretty confident the way he played Saturday.

Not hard to be confident against geno smith and the seahawks. It all depends on how the path to the super bowl develops...I could see him being confident against danny jones and the giants if they were to beat philly (very possible imo), but I could see him having a tough time on the road in Philly.

And even if he goes all the way to the championship like Jimmy G did once before...I could see a matchup against Mahommes, Burrow, or Allen making that backside a little tight. Lot of ball game left.

here is one article of many that explains why Purdy has been successful, he doesn't get raddled with the pass rush, as we/I know is a young QB's worst nightmare, he's aware of it and is athletic enough to avoid it and delivers catchable passes to his receivers.

If the SF OL can help slow the pressure, if Shanahan continues to use a lot of up tempo offensive schemes, Purdy may have a SB ring come February, specially with that defense, if not, well then Shanahan will have a tough choice deciding who his starting QB will be next season, either way, I havn't seen many rookie QB's as poised and confident as Brock Purdy

https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/3-reaso ... ng-qb-race

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 17:08

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 14:49

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2023 12:26

The question you have to ask is this. Which team has a halfway decent Defense by a crappy QB, and will have the same coach next year? That's where Brady will look. If he keeps playing. I don't thing there are any teams that fit that, so I'm saying he is done.

Oh. Not Green Bay? (I set you up pretty well there, didn’t I?)

But in all seriousness, how about the Rams (on the long shot that Stafford retires)?

Pretty sure the Rams will be in a rebuild mode this coming year.

I think you are right. Plus after they went all in last year they only have 4 picks this year and none in the first round. This rebuild is gonna take time.

I wonder if Brock has continued success, at what point do they consider him their QB? Or at least have an open competition with Lance.

Gotta think Garrapolo is done there. Waste of resources with 2 other potential QB’s and he is vastly being outplayed by a rookie 6th rounder.

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:35

I wonder if Brock has continued success, at what point do they consider him their QB? Or at least have an open competition with Lance.

Gotta think Garrapolo is done there. Waste of resources with 2 other potential QB’s and he is vastly being outplayed by a rookie 6th rounder.

Who was the 6th round pick?

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:50

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:35

I wonder if Brock has continued success, at what point do they consider him their QB? Or at least have an open competition with Lance.

Gotta think Garrapolo is done there. Waste of resources with 2 other potential QB’s and he is vastly being outplayed by a rookie 6th rounder.

Who was the 6th round pick?

Meant 7th

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:01

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:50

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:35

I wonder if Brock has continued success, at what point do they consider him their QB? Or at least have an open competition with Lance.

Gotta think Garrapolo is done there. Waste of resources with 2 other potential QB’s and he is vastly being outplayed by a rookie 6th rounder.

Who was the 6th round pick?

Meant 7th

Mr. Irrelevant thanks ya for that.

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:02

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:01

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:50

Who was the 6th round pick?

Meant 7th

Mr. Irrelevant thanks ya for that.

Let's not forget that Tom Brady was a 6th round pick. You never know what gems you might find later in the draft.

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:01

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:50

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 11:35

I wonder if Brock has continued success, at what point do they consider him their QB? Or at least have an open competition with Lance.

Gotta think Garrapolo is done there. Waste of resources with 2 other potential QB’s and he is vastly being outplayed by a rookie 6th rounder.

Who was the 6th round pick?

Meant 7th

really, I apologize for thinking it was bait to see if I forgot what Round Brock was drafted in

I promise to say 3 our Fathers, Hail Mary's, and a act of contrition as soon as humanly possible

williewasgreat wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:10

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:02

BF004 wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:01

Meant 7th

Mr. Irrelevant thanks ya for that.

Let's not forget that Tom Brady was a 6th round pick. You never know what gems you might find later in the draft.

yep, even famous Jack waited till the 17th round to draft Bart.

Well yeah, I knew Tom Brady was a 6th rounder. Pff...next thing you will have someone like Donald Driver make it to the 7th round too. You crack me up.

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:22

williewasgreat wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:10

Trudge wrote: ↑

18 Jan 2023 12:02

Mr. Irrelevant thanks ya for that.

Let's not forget that Tom Brady was a 6th round pick. You never know what gems you might find later in the draft.

yep, even famous Jack waited till the 17th round to draft Bart.

17th round yes. But he was only the 200th pick. The NFL has expanded to 32 teams from the 12 back then, but they really aren't drafting that many more players. Matter of fact they are drafting less. Back then there were 300 draft picks. Today it's only 262.