Re: Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2023
Posted: 09 Mar 2023 19:46
Yeah for like what $4.5 million?
We HAVE to put a 2nd round tender on Yosh.
We HAVE to put a 2nd round tender on Yosh.
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Yosh at best is a Packer for only another year anways. Other teams will pay him way too much when he becomes a UFA.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Mar 2023 19:49Njiman isn’t that good. A 2nd for him is highway robbery. Hell a 3rd for is a good deal. The dude is just a good backup or below average starter at OT. He’s basically Billy Turder.
I don't disagree that he WAS a below average starter. He's better at LT than Turner, now. He's also young and should be progressing.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑09 Mar 2023 19:49Njiman isn’t that good. A 2nd for him is highway robbery. Hell a 3rd for is a good deal. The dude is just a good backup or below average starter at OT. He’s basically Billy Turder.
Yup. Contrast him and Rodgers. Rodgers has had some injuries. But he’s played through them. Stafford, like early in his career, has had trouble staying on the field at times.Labrev wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 08:37Michael Lombardi says Matt Stafford is fully available via trade:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nf ... c8d74&ei=8
With this contract ($57m) especially for an older QB who's had injury woes as of late, I really doubt there is much of a market for him.
Wild. I guess this explains the GM effusively backing him and calling him a pillar of the ram to build around. Doth protest too much?Labrev wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 08:37Michael Lombardi says Matt Stafford is fully available via trade:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nf ... c8d74&ei=8
With this contract ($57m) especially for an older QB who's had injury woes as of late, I really doubt there is much of a market for him.
Yes and No. Rodgers missed games in 2013 and 2017 due to injury. Stafford missed games in 2009, 2010, 2019, and 2022 due to injury. Yes, he has been injured more than Rodgers, but it has been more big injuries in those 4 seasons, not where he has missed several games in a bunch of seasons due to smaller injuries. Outside of those years, neither QB has missed a game due to injury.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 09:30Yup. Contrast him and Rodgers. Rodgers has had some injuries. But he’s played through them. Stafford, like early in his career, has had trouble staying on the field at times.Labrev wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 08:37Michael Lombardi says Matt Stafford is fully available via trade:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nf ... c8d74&ei=8
With this contract ($57m) especially for an older QB who's had injury woes as of late, I really doubt there is much of a market for him.
Rodgers would be a tomb right now if he had played behind those lions OLs for years. Rodgers has had generally good protection in GB. Stafford is not a brittle guy. I think rams just shut him down last year when they lost hope of making playoffs.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 09:30Yup. Contrast him and Rodgers. Rodgers has had some injuries. But he’s played through them. Stafford, like early in his career, has had trouble staying on the field at times.Labrev wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 08:37Michael Lombardi says Matt Stafford is fully available via trade:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nf ... c8d74&ei=8
With this contract ($57m) especially for an older QB who's had injury woes as of late, I really doubt there is much of a market for him.
No one can actually talk to Lamar until free agency starts on the 15th, so we have nothing but rumors until then; but could you imagine the pressure on that division if the Pats throw Mac Jones to the Raiders and go after Jackson? Jackson and Allen and all
and unlike the Packers, the Ravens wont be giving any team permission to talk to him sooner, so Lamar is in a holding pattern right now.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 10:52No one can actually talk to Lamar until free agency starts on the 15th, so we have nothing but rumors until then; but could you imagine the pressure on that division if the Pats throw Mac Jones to the Raiders and go after Jackson? Jackson and Allen and all
2022 was the last gasp for that Zimmer team.
Not to single out [mention]Yoop[/mention], I've seen this said multiple times by multiple posters, but what makes people say this?Yoop wrote: ↑10 Mar 2023 11:11imo he is a RPO QB, not specially accurate passer, and lack patience in the pocket, I'd think that narrows the teams that would be interested in him, I have trouble believing Belichick would want that type of QB, but who knows, Qb's with RB ability are a tough chore for any defense.
Jackson thrives in the offense designed around his skills, he would struggle in other offenses that depend more heavily on certain throws