Page 69 of 77
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 04 Jan 2025 13:24
by RingoCStarrQB
BF004 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 09:36
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025 19:55
Competent coaching staffs shouldn't require or need external consultants. Just my opinion.
If you start with a conclusion in mind, can use anything as supporting evidence.
No interest in wasting time or effort gathering additional supporting evidence on such an obvious conclusion. You are hereby permitted to survey the 32 NFL teams on this matter.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 04 Jan 2025 13:29
by RingoCStarrQB
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:22
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:19
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑03 Jan 2025 23:00
Then there are not competent coaching staffs.
What an awful take.
What a ridiculous knee jerk reaction to a serious factual matter.
Your take was neither serious nor factual.
Another ridiculous knee jerk reaction to a _____________.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 04 Jan 2025 13:29
by Pckfn23
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:29
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:22
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:19
What a ridiculous knee jerk reaction to a serious factual matter.
Your take was neither serious nor factual.
Another ridiculous knee jerk reaction to a _____________.
I think you misunderstand what the term knee jerk means.
Getting upset about our coaching staff hiring outside coaches to help out before finding out that pretty much every NFL team does this would be a knee jerk reaction. It is not a knee jerk reaction to point out that getting mad about this is an awful take.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 04 Jan 2025 13:31
by RingoCStarrQB
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:29
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:29
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑04 Jan 2025 13:22
Your take was neither serious nor factual.
Another ridiculous knee jerk reaction to a _____________.
I think you misunderstand what the term knee jerk means.
I like it!
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 07:41
by BF004
So is he more Nick Perry or more Casey Hayward??
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 07:52
by RingoCStarrQB
BF004 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 07:41
So is he more Nick Perry or more Casey Hayward??
He should have made the Pro Bowl then ..............
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 08:30
by TheSkeptic
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 07:52
BF004 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 07:41
So is he more Nick Perry or more Casey Hayward??
He should have made the Pro Bowl then ..............
Since week 11. He was not that good before. But maybe he is fully healed now and was not before, or maybe the foot is back to normal strength and was not before.
At any rate, he has earned a prove it year contract from the Packers. Or maybe more, while he is still under the radar
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 08:46
by APB
BF004 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 07:41
So is he more Nick Perry or more Casey Hayward??
I still don’t trust him.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 08:56
by Labrev
BF004 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 07:41
So is he more Nick Perry or more Casey Hayward??
It feels like a mirage. Teams have not really been testing him much. He has also still made zero plays on the ball, and his change of direction doesn't look very good to me.
All that said, it is encouraging that he can still play after those injuries, and is not stinking up the field. Maybe he can take the next step and actually force incompletions.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 10:19
by BF004
I’m in the maybe offer 1 year, 5-8 million.
Other than that, I’m fine if he goes, maybe add a different vet in that range or just go the Packer route and flood the position with draft picks.
Wonder how Jaire’s situation might impact a Stokes decision.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 11:10
by NCF
Feels like the Nick Perry situation.
#1 - Jaire should have nothing to do with what you do with Stokes
#2 - I am not giving the Stokes the "I guess you proved yourself" contract. I doubt the market will, either.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 11:14
by musclestang
He’s been decent, I’ve seen nothing to make me think he’s turned some corner and you can find stretches like that for so many DBs across the league year after year and nOne of them are that good.
He’s been better than garbage, but I haven’t seen stand out either. Lots of guys play at that level and I’m not opening up the purse strings very wide at all.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 13:22
by APB
Until he starts actually getting credit for passes defended or getting some turnovers, I’d say the stats in his favor are more a matter of system efficiency rather than player excellence.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 16:41
by Pckfn23
Stomping the Saints feels like a decade ago.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 18:05
by Scott4Pack
At this point, I'm persuaded more than ever that this MLF Packer squad more often plays only to the level of the competition. Yeah, there are exceptions. But a general guide... And as a very young team, I don't know why we should ever expect anything different.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 18:07
by APB
APB wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 08:46
BF004 wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025 07:41
So is he more Nick Perry or more Casey Hayward??
I still don’t trust him.
Neither does Hafley, apparently…
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 22:22
by APB
Relevant.
.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 05 Jan 2025 22:58
by APB
Sure seems pretty good for a squad that took a step back this year…
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 06 Jan 2025 06:26
by Yoop
our 11-6 record pales compared to 14-3 Vikings and 15-2 Lions, especially so since they ran the table on us this year, and now we got delivered by the hapless Bears, 5 of our losses happened right here in the north, sure on paper we rank out well, but that wont mean squat against Philly next week, coach, players, have to do much better, this Bears loss was beyond stinky.
Re: Green Bay Packers' News - 2024
Posted: 06 Jan 2025 07:15
by go pak go
Yoop wrote: ↑06 Jan 2025 06:26
our 11-6 record pales compared to 14-3 Vikings and 15-2 Lions, especially so since they ran the table on us this year, and now we got delivered by the hapless Bears, 5 of our losses happened right here in the north, sure on paper we rank out well, but that wont mean squat against Philly next week, coach, players, have to do much better, this Bears loss was beyond stinky.
Or maybe it's that people don't understand what a 5th to 7th ranked team looks like.
It means there are 4 to 6 teams ranked better than us.
1. Lions
2. Eagles
3. Vikings
4. Bills
5. Chiefs
6. Ravens
Looks like rankings and reality line up really well actually.