Re: Cheese Curds - News Around The League 2022
Posted: 11 Oct 2022 07:58
Packers should not (could not) trade for DJ Moore from Carolina.
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
And yet:salmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:11I'll be very disappointed in Gutey if we don't trade for a WR. Or two. Dunno which ones, but we need a boost.
Can't have the opponent putting 8 in box, and still winning when AR checks to a throw versus favorable coverage.
Even a marginal upgrade over Hammy Watkins and Amari Poggers would do...
Yeah, AR has played poorly. And LaFleur needs to get his thinking cap on. The innovation he showed the first 2 seasons has worn off.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:15And yet:image.pngsalmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:11I'll be very disappointed in Gutey if we don't trade for a WR. Or two. Dunno which ones, but we need a boost.
Can't have the opponent putting 8 in box, and still winning when AR checks to a throw versus favorable coverage.
Even a marginal upgrade over Hammy Watkins and Amari Poggers would do...
we seem deceptive and calculated with scripted plays in first half, then after half time adjustments we look like a different offense.salmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:56Yeah, AR has played poorly. And LaFleur needs to get his thinking cap on. The innovation he showed the first 2 seasons has worn off.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:15And yet:image.pngsalmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:11I'll be very disappointed in Gutey if we don't trade for a WR. Or two. Dunno which ones, but we need a boost.
Can't have the opponent putting 8 in box, and still winning when AR checks to a throw versus favorable coverage.
Even a marginal upgrade over Hammy Watkins and Amari Poggers would do...
But I think the "let's give AR zero good WRs and he'll flourish" -theory is looking worse week by week. What folks forget, not having winning WRs leads to opponents getting to stack the box vs our supposed running game strength. We won't have 4+ yard average if AR doesn't check to pass vs loaded boxes. And if we end up in 3rd and long, when we just have to pass, the chances are low.
There was a previous goal line play where Cobb had the slowest cut in human history and had no chance at doing what the play called for. He can win when low on priority list for D. Not often enough.
Amari is neutral to evil chaos as returner, never doing anything plus, always risking catastrophe. Also worthless as WR.
Watson is slumming in the doghouse despite being the only WR with deep speed. He's so untrusted deep, that we don't even try him as a MVS -type go-route-pro. Instead AR is forcing deep throws to marginal athletic talents.
Hammy Watkins looks like a guy giving a decently motivated shot at a new job, but isn't really inspired for full rejuvenation effort. Basically ready for retirement.
Doubs is super promising, but high-risk at this point.
Lazard is a great run-blocking possession WR2 or WR3, but he scares no opponent. As WR1, opposing DCs can go "niiiice, no safety help needed"...
---
Look, we don't need one All-Pro snap hog like Adams, but we DO need a WR or three who can win their 1-1s when put in a favorable situation.
It is remotely possible Watson and Doubs hit rookie magic mushroom, instead of rookie wall. If that lottery ticket fails, this WR group simply sucks.
salmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:56Yeah, AR has played poorly. And LaFleur needs to get his thinking cap on. The innovation he showed the first 2 seasons has worn off.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:15And yet:image.pngsalmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:11I'll be very disappointed in Gutey if we don't trade for a WR. Or two. Dunno which ones, but we need a boost.
Can't have the opponent putting 8 in box, and still winning when AR checks to a throw versus favorable coverage.
Even a marginal upgrade over Hammy Watkins and Amari Poggers would do...
But I think the "let's give AR zero good WRs and he'll flourish" -theory is looking worse week by week. What folks forget, not having winning WRs leads to opponents getting to stack the box vs our supposed running game strength. We won't have 4+ yard average if AR doesn't check to pass vs loaded boxes. And if we end up in 3rd and long, when we just have to pass, the chances are low.
There was a previous goal line play where Cobb had the slowest cut in human history and had no chance at doing what the play called for. He can win when low on priority list for D. Not often enough.
Amari is neutral to evil chaos as returner, never doing anything plus, always risking catastrophe. Also worthless as WR.
Watson is slumming in the doghouse despite being the only WR with deep speed. He's so untrusted deep, that we don't even try him as a MVS -type go-route-pro. Instead AR is forcing deep throws to marginal athletic talents.
Hammy Watkins looks like a guy giving a decently motivated shot at a new job, but isn't really inspired for full rejuvenation effort. Basically ready for retirement.
Doubs is super promising, but high-risk at this point.
Lazard is a great run-blocking possession WR2 or WR3, but he scares no opponent. As WR1, opposing DCs can go "niiiice, no safety help needed"...
---
Look, we don't need one All-Pro snap hog like Adams, but we DO need a WR or three who can win their 1-1s when put in a favorable situation.
It is remotely possible Watson and Doubs hit rookie magic mushroom, instead of rookie wall. If that lottery ticket fails, this WR group simply sucks.
Not to mention the running lane up the middle for a guy like Dillon, who makes yards when there is 0 space between the C and G.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:15And yet:image.pngsalmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:11I'll be very disappointed in Gutey if we don't trade for a WR. Or two. Dunno which ones, but we need a boost.
Can't have the opponent putting 8 in box, and still winning when AR checks to a throw versus favorable coverage.
Even a marginal upgrade over Hammy Watkins and Amari Poggers would do...
Personally I think it is 90% schematic. Why do I say this? Since week 1 it has been a tale of 2 halves EVERY SINGLE GAME. 2nd Half Bears, 1st Half Bucs, 2nd Half Patriots, 1st Half Giants. We can be a really good offense, passing and rushing. I think the "give Rodgers zero good receivers" shtick is silly, but there are enough weapons to be a good offense and we can see that in spurts. We just are not using them effectively at times. This isn't a top half WR core, but between RB, TE, and WR it is enough to be good, borderline top 10. It's going to see it's bumps early on and we knew that, but forget. I don't think LaFleur is doing the offense any favors right now. We have shied away from scheming guys open like we did early in his tenure. Case in point the inorganic deep shots that honestly haven't even been remotely close the last 4 weeks.salmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:56Yeah, AR has played poorly. And LaFleur needs to get his thinking cap on. The innovation he showed the first 2 seasons has worn off.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:15And yet:image.pngsalmar80 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 08:11I'll be very disappointed in Gutey if we don't trade for a WR. Or two. Dunno which ones, but we need a boost.
Can't have the opponent putting 8 in box, and still winning when AR checks to a throw versus favorable coverage.
Even a marginal upgrade over Hammy Watkins and Amari Poggers would do...
But I think the "let's give AR zero good WRs and he'll flourish" -theory is looking worse week by week. What folks forget, not having winning WRs leads to opponents getting to stack the box vs our supposed running game strength. We won't have 4+ yard average if AR doesn't check to pass vs loaded boxes. And if we end up in 3rd and long, when we just have to pass, the chances are low.
There was a previous goal line play where Cobb had the slowest cut in human history and had no chance at doing what the play called for. He can win when low on priority list for D. Not often enough.
Amari is neutral to evil chaos as returner, never doing anything plus, always risking catastrophe. Also worthless as WR.
Watson is slumming in the doghouse despite being the only WR with deep speed. He's so untrusted deep, that we don't even try him as a MVS -type go-route-pro. Instead AR is forcing deep throws to marginal athletic talents.
Hammy Watkins looks like a guy giving a decently motivated shot at a new job, but isn't really inspired for full rejuvenation effort. Basically ready for retirement.
Doubs is super promising, but high-risk at this point.
Lazard is a great run-blocking possession WR2 or WR3, but he scares no opponent. As WR1, opposing DCs can go "niiiice, no safety help needed"...
---
Look, we don't need one All-Pro snap hog like Adams, but we DO need a WR or three who can win their 1-1s when put in a favorable situation.
It is remotely possible Watson and Doubs hit rookie magic mushroom, instead of rookie wall. If that lottery ticket fails, this WR group simply sucks.
To the extent that this is true, that's only because AR & MLF are not adjusting the game plan (well enough) for the changed circumstances, not because the model has not been tried and succeeded for many teams.
NYG was stacking the box and both RBs were still beating it.What folks forget, not having winning WRs leads to opponents getting to stack the box vs our supposed running game strength. We won't have 4+ yard average if AR doesn't check to pass vs loaded boxes. And if we end up in 3rd and long, when we just have to pass, the chances are low.
Rodgers is so conscious of seeing defensive alignments that stack against the run that he doesn't even give Jones/Dillon the opportunity to fail. Someone needs to remind Rodgers the Packer RBs are averaging 5 yds/carry despite opponents having no fear of his passing offense. I am beyond sick and tired of seeing Jones' and Dillon's opportunities limited because Rodgers didn't like the pre-snap defensive alignment and then the HC in his post-game presser supporting the decisions yet repeating the "our RBs need more touches" mantra week after week.Labrev wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 09:47NYG was stacking the box and both RBs were still beating it.
The beauty of our ground game is, you have Jones, who has great vision and quickness and will run well against most teams. And if Jones isn't running well on a given day, you have Dillon, who can create yards even when they're not there by virtue of how powerful the guy is *and* Jones has shown he can line up at receiver!
horse &%$@, do you have all22 that shows receivers open short, cause I've rarely seen that watching on the tube, in fact often the camera spans back and it's beyond obvious that everyone is covered, even on some of the deep throws Rodgers has missed on there is a possibility he threw a bit off or to the side because those receivers are covered.Labrev wrote: ↑11 Oct 2022 10:15Funny how little Daniel Jones beat us with way, way worse WRs than we have on 1 ankle and our QB, supposedly one of the "best ever" at the position couldn't outplay him with better WRs, against a defense that wasn't much (if at all) better.
"WR help" is just a sorry excuse for the poor performances of Rodgers and MLF, both of whom are performing poorly precisely because neither of them can think outside the box that is WR.
It's like you have a Ferrari and a Lambo in your garage (Jones and Dillon) yet you are hung up on the fact that your Scooter situation isn't good enough to get you where you want when you want. Um, hello?? Take your Ferrari/Lambo.