Packers Huddle

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:11

You might as well grab 2 then!

Realist wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:30

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:11

You might as well grab 2 then!

This has gone on a bit too long. Someone in this thread stated they wanted a share but it was not in their budget at this time. I will purchase it for them as a Christmas Present. Was it Crazy Legs? Cant remember. Pm me.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:47

Realist wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:30

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:11

You might as well grab 2 then!

This has gone on a bit too long. Someone in this thread stated they wanted a share but it was not in their budget at this time. I will purchase it for them as a Christmas Present. Was it Crazy Legs? Cant remember. Pm me.

No one would be able to tell you to shut up for quite some time if you spread christmas cheer in that way. It was lebrev

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 16:57

Crazylegs Starks said they would get one for their dad as a Christmas present but it's outside his budget. Yeah, I said I would buy one if I had the cash to spare, but the dad should definitely get priority over me.

**edit** no wait I think he ended up buying.

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 14:01

salmar80 wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 13:11

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 12:59

That's because the Packers think they are special. For the same reason, they never played AFL teams before the merger in 1970. All the other teams participated. Packers were "special".

I don't think the Packers could decline if the league scheduled them for an overseas game. Not the team's fault the league hasn't done that. The international series started in 2007, and the Packers have been a fantastic at filling stadiums in away games in the US during that period. I'm sure if we hit a period of tough times, and that draw is lost, overseas games would follow.

So why are the Packers the only team that hasn't played overseas? Oh yeah, they are special. Even New England has been 3 times.

Realist wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 17:11

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 16:57

Crazylegs Starks said they would get one for their dad as a Christmas present but it's outside his budget. Yeah, I said I would buy one if I had the cash to spare, but the dad should definitely get priority over me.

**edit** no wait I think he ended up buying.

Good lord. Nothing is easy here.

Realist wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 17:11

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 16:57

Crazylegs Starks said they would get one for their dad as a Christmas present but it's outside his budget. Yeah, I said I would buy one if I had the cash to spare, but the dad should definitely get priority over me.

**edit** no wait I think he ended up buying.

Good lord. Nothing is easy here.

go pak go wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 17:20

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 14:01

salmar80 wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 13:11

I don't think the Packers could decline if the league scheduled them for an overseas game. Not the team's fault the league hasn't done that. The international series started in 2007, and the Packers have been a fantastic at filling stadiums in away games in the US during that period. I'm sure if we hit a period of tough times, and that draw is lost, overseas games would follow.

So why are the Packers the only team that hasn't played overseas? Oh yeah, they are special. Even New England has been 3 times.

Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.

Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 20:49

go pak go wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 17:20

Raptorman wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 14:01

So why are the Packers the only team that hasn't played overseas? Oh yeah, they are special. Even New England has been 3 times.

Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.

Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.

How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 07:19

Just heard on mad dog sports radio where they were hating on the stock that the org sold 110k shares in 48 hours.



Also same mad dog station had a commercial for buying stock telling people to go to packersstock dot com. That’s the first official marketing I’ve seen.

wallyuwl wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 10:14

Drj820 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 07:19

Just heard on mad dog sports radio where they were hating on the stock that the org sold 110k shares in 48 hours.



Also same mad dog station had a commercial for buying stock telling people to go to packersstock dot com. That’s the first official marketing I’ve seen.

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 11:02

wallyuwl wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 10:14

Drj820 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 07:19

Just heard on mad dog sports radio where they were hating on the stock that the org sold 110k shares in 48 hours.



Also same mad dog station had a commercial for buying stock telling people to go to packersstock dot com. That’s the first official marketing I’ve seen.

thats a third of stock offerings in less then two days, far out, there are actually Packer fans who like me believe supporting a better experience for fans and the up keep of Lambeau with disposable income is a good thing

salmar80 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 11:57

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 11:02

wallyuwl wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 10:14

thats a third of stock offerings in less then two days, far out, there are actually Packer fans who like me believe supporting a better experience for fans and the up keep of Lambeau with disposable income is a good thing

I don't think you are hearing these words on the screen right...

Realist wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 15:30

This has gone on a bit too long. Someone in this thread stated they wanted a share but it was not in their budget at this time. I will purchase it for them as a Christmas Present. Was it Crazy Legs? Cant remember. Pm me.

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 16:57

Crazylegs Starks said they would get one for their dad as a Christmas present but it's outside his budget. Yeah, I said I would buy one if I had the cash to spare, but the dad should definitely get priority over me.

**edit** no wait I think he ended up buying.

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 13:00

salmar80 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 11:57

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 11:02

thats a third of stock offerings in less then two days, far out, there are actually Packer fans who like me believe supporting a better experience for fans and the up keep of Lambeau with disposable income is a good thing

I don't think you are hearing these words on the screen right...

No, read it on JS online

GREEN BAY – The Green Bay Packers have sold $36.7 million in shares in the first day and a-half of the team's sixth stock sale.

Packers fans scooped up 110,000 shares of the NFL's only publicly-owned team between Tuesday morning and Wednesday evening. About 100,000 purchases were made.

salmar80 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 13:06

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 13:00

salmar80 wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 11:57

I don't think you are hearing these words on the screen right...

No, read it on JS online

GREEN BAY – The Green Bay Packers have sold $36.7 million in shares in the first day and a-half of the team's sixth stock sale.

Packers fans scooped up 110,000 shares of the NFL's only publicly-owned team between Tuesday morning and Wednesday evening. About 100,000 purchases were made.

One last chance to go back in the thread and discover the joke on your own.

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 05:55

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 20:49

go pak go wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 17:20

Because teams don't give up their home games vs the Packers. The Packers on the road is a guaranteed sell out and the home team is not willing to put that in London. It's simple economics. it's better to have a crappier team play the London home team where attendance will be in the 80,000's anyways.

Home teams like St. Louis, early LA, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, San Diego/LAC, Miami, Cincy, Atlanta don't sell out games easily. There is no way in hell they are giving up a Packers game to take it over seas.

How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.

It's complicated

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 18:01

Yoop wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2021 05:55

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2021 20:49

How does this relate to the Packers stock sale? Scratching my head trying to figure out the tie to the St Louis Rams.

It's complicated

That's what Murphy said about Rodgers. And no we're not talking about the Murphy that had 20 interceptions playing DB for the Packers wearing #37. And no we're not talking about Richard or Amari. Many headscratchers to deal with here.