Re: Rodgers Traded
Posted: 26 Apr 2023 14:29
im pulling for the Jets and Rodgers to do well. If he wins a super bowl in New York people will see how much the Packers coaches and front office held him back.
Why do you want that to be the outcome? Because it validates your own opinion that the GB coaches and front office held him back?
1) I have long believed that for many years Rodgers covered many sins of the org and kept alot of people employed that would have been fired without him.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:36Why do you want that to be the outcome? Because it validates your own opinion that the GB coaches and front office held him back?
Why would a Packers fan want an outcome that lends evidence to the idea that their own team is mismanaged
question two is funny to me. If your team was mismanaged, would you prefer that remain hidden??? I would be happy it was exposed.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:36Why do you want that to be the outcome? Because it validates your own opinion that the GB coaches and front office held him back?
Why would a Packers fan want an outcome that lends evidence to the idea that their own team is mismanaged
such poor ST's that the cord was fired one week after that loss, one viable WR and a RB that led the team in receptions, and people blame Rodgers because he forced a pass to Adams and Lazard was open, for a change.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 10:40You mean the pick that was clearly defensive holding and pass interference and Lazard got out muscles by a DB 3 inches shorter and 30 pounds lighter? That pick?Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 09:40I actually do blame Rodgers for the 2021 NFCCG loss. Threw the pick right before half that gave Kevin King an extra chance to screw up. Did not run the ball on 3rd and 8 when there was lots of green grass, instead forced the ball in the end zone and we ended up kicking a FGYoop wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 09:28
if you only rank a QB by championships, specially when he was never the reason we didn't win more then have the QB's in the HOF wouldn't be there.
Starr needed 13 HOF players to win those championships, can you even contemplate the production Rodgers could have produced with there help?
Actually, to take it a step further, you would rather:YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:36Why do you want that to be the outcome? Because it validates your own opinion that the GB coaches and front office held him back?
Why would a Packers fan want an outcome that lends evidence to the idea that their own team is mismanaged
Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:391) I have long believed that for many years Rodgers covered many sins of the org and kept alot of people employed that would have been fired without him.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:36Why do you want that to be the outcome? Because it validates your own opinion that the GB coaches and front office held him back?
Why would a Packers fan want an outcome that lends evidence to the idea that their own team is mismanaged
2) If untalented, incompetent people within the org are exposed, they can find new jobs and maybe people can be hired who can win a championship.
3) I like championships.
I would be pulling for this so that the Packers could be better off in the long term.
Also, although 12 was a pain in the a** on the way out the door...i like him and wish him well.
So I guess what bugs me here is that you're starting with an assumed underlying truth, and looking for/rooting for evidence that you are correct.
Whoa whoa. Thanks for the novel but I NEVER said I am pulling for the Packers to collapse or do bad. I simply said I am pulling for the Rodgers to do well and win, so the world will see he was capable all along.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 15:09Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:391) I have long believed that for many years Rodgers covered many sins of the org and kept alot of people employed that would have been fired without him.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:36Why do you want that to be the outcome? Because it validates your own opinion that the GB coaches and front office held him back?
Why would a Packers fan want an outcome that lends evidence to the idea that their own team is mismanaged
2) If untalented, incompetent people within the org are exposed, they can find new jobs and maybe people can be hired who can win a championship.
3) I like championships.
I would be pulling for this so that the Packers could be better off in the long term.
Also, although 12 was a pain in the a** on the way out the door...i like him and wish him well.So I guess what bugs me here is that you're starting with an assumed underlying truth, and looking for/rooting for evidence that you are correct.
Your view is "The team is mismanaged, and Rodgers leaving the org is a chance to prove that."
My view is "With Rodgers leaving the org, we have a good chance to evaluate Rodgers, Gutey, and MLF with some separation from each other for the first time."
I want to see where the outcome lands. My opinion is that the Jets will find out that Rodgers' immense talent and successful avoidance of turnovers has left him broadly beyond reproach in other areas of his game where he struggles, such as decision making on 3rd downs, taking what the defense gives him, and playing with WRs who don't have an intimate cranial connection with his own thought process. But I don't know that to be true.
On the Packers side, I genuinely have no idea how Love will play or how MLF's offense will look with a different QB prepped and prepared for under center. I'm interested in finding out.
But while those are questions and opinions of mine, I am HOPING/ROOTING for the best possible Packers outcomes, because I am a fan of the team. I would like it if Rodgers proves in New York that he has some flaws the national media has been overlooking that help explain why the Packers didn't win more championships, and I would like it if the Packers' head coach and GM succeed without Rodgers.
You would like it if Rodgers succeeded and the Packers failed in order to bring about changes that you would like to see happen. Your version is that you would prefer to be right about your evaluations than to see the team succeed immediately. You would prefer to see the org have to tear things down in order to rebuild it to take another shot at a GM/coach combination that can eventually bring you more championships. Because you'd rather have your opinions about the team confirmed than have the team actually be good as it is.
That's my issue. We both want the Packers to win championships. I think this season is a big year for evaluation to see where we are and I hope that we are much better off than the national media and some fans think. I hope so. And I want to see the Jets and Rodgers look fine because I like the players involved but I HOPE that they finish poorly enough to maximize the Packers' draft pick. Because I ROOT and HOPE for the best possible outcomes for the team I am a fan of.
You root for the best possible outcomes for a player you like and the opinions you hold dear. In the end, we both want the same thing: championships. And in the end, your opinion MAY be validated. Rodgers might crush it, the Packers might bomb, and the team we both root for may need to blow everything up and start over. But I would never HOPE for that outcome. I would ROOT for the team to be surprisingly competent and for the offense to look really coordinated and schematically sound with our new QB.
I acknowledge that the path to championships may be a long chaotic one or a short simple one. I ROOT for the short simple one. You root for the long chaotic one. Because it would mean, first and foremost, you've been right all along.
Oreally?
Right here you say that you think Rodgers covered for the sins of the team, that you think the team has incompetent and untalented people that would be replaced, and that your rooting for Rodgers to expose that is specifically linked to making the Packers better in the long term, implicitly by replacing their current leadership.Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:391) I have long believed that for many years Rodgers covered many sins of the org and kept alot of people employed that would have been fired without him.
2) If untalented, incompetent people within the org are exposed, they can find new jobs and maybe people can be hired who can win a championship.
3) I like championships.
I would be pulling for this so that the Packers could be better off in the long term.
Also, although 12 was a pain in the a** on the way out the door...i like him and wish him well.
No.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 15:43Oreally?
Right here you say that you think Rodgers covered for the sins of the team, that you think the team has incompetent and untalented people that would be replaced, and that your rooting for Rodgers to expose that is specifically linked to making the Packers better in the long term, implicitly by replacing their current leadership.Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 14:391) I have long believed that for many years Rodgers covered many sins of the org and kept alot of people employed that would have been fired without him.
2) If untalented, incompetent people within the org are exposed, they can find new jobs and maybe people can be hired who can win a championship.
3) I like championships.
I would be pulling for this so that the Packers could be better off in the long term.
Also, although 12 was a pain in the a** on the way out the door...i like him and wish him well.
So yes, you did say pretty clearly that you would like to see the team fire their coach and/or GM and replace them with new people who you think might do better. And we all know that coaches and GMs don't get fired when the team succeeds.
Exonerate the player at the expense of the team. Settle the debate to prove you right. Expose the incompetent and untalented. Make the Packers better in the long run by proving that there was mismanagement with the current regime.Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 15:56No.
For years there has been a debate on whether rodgers was a choker, or the team was holding him back with neglecting certain positions, having terrible special teams, drafting his backup instead of tee Higgins etc etc.
I simply stated I hope he has success in New York so he can be exonerated and it be clearly seen that the problem was the org.
I was also reminded of the Favre debate. Lots of Favre loyalists were like "See?? Favre is playing better and winning more. TT is an idiot CONFIRMEDt!" Turns out, wasn't that simple.go pak go wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 16:01I think the most probable result is going to be the most frustrating result.
1. Rodgers is going to go to New York and have success because the Jets are good and Rodgers can still be good.
2. The Packers are going to have success in the long run because overall the Packers are a solid franchise with a lot of talent at a lot of positions.
I suspect this will be similar to the Favre situation where Favre was great in New York (before the injury) and in Minnesota and low and behold the terrible and stupid Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy also knew what they were doing...but not obvious dynasty level.
People are in love with absolutes. Our country is in absolutist culture. I don't think we are going to get that here. I expect the Packers to have 2 1sts next year and both being in that 18 to 25 range.
I know you are nervous that rodgers is gonna look a lot better because for years you’ve defended the front office with every move and at every turn…but I hope the packers do well..I just additionally hope rodgers does well. Because for years I’ve said that people would hate to see the team without him…and I believe rodgers winning will declare him the winner in the debate of who was to blame. No reason to take your anxiety out on me.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 16:03Exonerate the player at the expense of the team. Settle the debate to prove you right. Expose the incompetent and untalented. Make the Packers better in the long run by proving that there was mismanagement with the current regime.Drj820 wrote: ↑26 Apr 2023 15:56No.
For years there has been a debate on whether rodgers was a choker, or the team was holding him back with neglecting certain positions, having terrible special teams, drafting his backup instead of tee Higgins etc etc.
I simply stated I hope he has success in New York so he can be exonerated and it be clearly seen that the problem was the org.
Yeah, I'm satisfied that you are clearly saying exactly what we can all clearly read. No need to belabor this.
No one has any issue with the well-wishing.
But I want to move on from the semantic back and forth and talk about another, related statement. It may deserve a thread, as someone suggested, dedicated to the endless argument over the current management, but it's been something I've wanted to say for a while.
Here lies an essay. Feel free to skip. This is almost entirely about me, and why I really like Gutenkunst.