Packers Huddle

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

This 23 and yoop spat reminds me of Toby doing nothing and Michael being triggered anyways.

go pak go wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:43

This 23 and yoop spat reminds me of Toby doing nothing and Michael being triggered anyways.

The funniest thing is that it exemplifies the meme SO WELL!

Acrobat wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:19

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 13:44

Acrobat wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:19

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

But there's no middle finger in that GIF, Yoop. Are you saying it was a metaphorical middle finger???

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 13:44

Acrobat wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:19

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

I’ve been telling you just to add him to the ignore list. The forum is much better. On God.

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 13:44

Acrobat wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:19

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

Cool.

lupedafiasco wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 14:25

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 13:44

Acrobat wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:19

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

I’ve been telling you just to add him to the ignore list. The forum is much better. On God.

100

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 14:22

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 13:44

Acrobat wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 10:19

LOL nothing like unintentionally triggering someone.

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

But there's no middle finger in that GIF, Yoop. Are you saying it was a metaphorical middle finger???

yep

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 16:34

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 14:22

Yoop wrote: ↑

14 Sep 2022 13:44

there was nothing unintentional about it, he didn't like me calling it a cartoon forum and that was his response, more cartoons

But there's no middle finger in that GIF, Yoop. Are you saying it was a metaphorical middle finger???

yep

Nope

23 is in rare form.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2022 20:58

Drj820 wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2022 20:56

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2022 20:53

"Wait and see" was in quotes, as in it was a actual quote, but in reality it was only your interpretation of what Bakhtiari said. What he said was not the "exact same thing" as "wait and see." You used that interpretation to cast doubt and negativity. What Bakhtiari actually said along with the interview as a whole portrays a progression that is very positive up to this point and coming off the PUP is the next step in the checklist that leads to getting on the field.

I was not the only one to see the attempt at incorrectly casting a negative light on it.

clown alert ^^^

I am sorry, did my calling out your inaccurate portrayal of the interview, offend you in some way? If it does, be accurate next time.

The ENTIRE theme of their conversation was next steps, progression, process, steps to getting back in the game, NOT this WAIT and see garbage. It was about the work that Bakhtiari is putting in and how it has gone in a positive direction since the start of training camp which allowed him to get off the PUP.

Honestly the best part of the entire thing was him ribbing Aaron Rodgers.

We remain in “wait and see” mode for Bahk FYI.

In the "yes, but" column, take away the first six consecutive years, five of which were with the Browns, and BB grades out at:

Regular season - 339 games, 250 wins, .737 winning

and, as some of us feel (taking away his one playoff year in the first six), the important numbers:

42 playoff games, 30 wins, .714 winning (which is considerably better than .400)

Half Empty wrote: ↑

19 Sep 2022 09:21

In the "yes, but" column, take away the first six consecutive years, five of which were with the Browns, and BB grades out at:

Regular season - 339 games, 250 wins, .737 winning

and, as some of us feel (taking away his one playoff year in the first six), the important numbers:

42 playoff games, 30 wins, .714 winning (which is considerably better than .400)

I don't think any losses by BB's teams should count, because sucky players lost them, not him. And no wins by LaFleur should count because great players won them despite him.

If LaFleur were to win an SB this year, that shouldn't count because it's all AR. No playoff losses by BB's teams should count, because sucky players lost them despite him.

Looking at it this way, holy moles, LaFleur really, really sucks.

He should ONLY get respect if he maintains same winning percentage and wins SBs constantly with a crap QB and sucky rosters.



---

.....and yes, getting outcoached in the playoffs has been a real thing for LaFleur and remains a valid criticism. Otherwise he's gotten a helluva lotta wins outta the talent at his disposal.

Mike Evans suspended 1 Game.




https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... -one-game/

I saw a tweet today that made go hmmmm. The Giants could be undefeated when we meet them in London. They play the Cowboys and Bears. Who would've thought that?

When we realize that we can blitz, the rest of the league is $%@#.