From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.
- MVS wasn't a good WR. No one thinks he was. He screwed up a lot of plays. He was held accountable by not extending him.
- AR is great. On a failed play, it's likely someone else screwed up. Sometimes rarely AR screws up all by himself, and pointing that out is not blaming AR for everything. He has been held accountable by giving him record extensions.
- Deep passes are harder to complete than short ones, even if it's AR throwing and regardless of who is catching.
- AR and great WR can complete a higher % of deep passes than AR and a sucky WR.
- You don't need the playbook to see if a receiver runs a bad route (you can see things like late release, getting stuck in press, getting re-routed, rounded routes, etc.)
- However, you would need the playbook to know exact planned catch points on a given play, because, well, they are planned and secret. Catch points depend on advanced things like planned QB progression and time it takes to go from from read to read, depth of QB drop, protection, audibles and route adjustments, decoy routes, picks etc.
- Not all that much in Amari Rodgers news.
common knowledge, we all know this stuff, but what the heck does any of it have to do with catch rate to targeted throws, obviously there are a variety of reasons for why Scantling failed to catch half the passes thrown to him, seriously, who in the heck doesn't know that? all it does is muddy up and complicate this conversation.
again this is you guys attempting to lay some of Scantlings ineptitude on Rodgers, huge fail boys, go drink some coffee. and Sal, quit making your woman cry.
If what Salmar said is all common knowledge, then why do you continue to argue against it?
For the 10th time this has little to do with Scantling himself and nothing to do with placing blame on Rodgers. NOTHING.
How is that for brevity?
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
common knowledge, we all know this stuff, but what the heck does any of it have to do with catch rate to targeted throws, obviously there are a variety of reasons for why Scantling failed to catch half the passes thrown to him, seriously, who in the heck doesn't know that? all it does is muddy up and complicate this conversation.
again this is you guys attempting to lay some of Scantlings ineptitude on Rodgers, huge fail boys, go drink some coffee. and Sal, quit making your woman cry.
If what Salmar said is all common knowledge, then why do you continue to argue against it?
For the 10th time this has little to do with Scantling himself and nothing to do with placing blame on Rodgers. NOTHING.
How is that for brevity?
this had everything to do with Scantling not catching 50% of targets, or have you forgotten my mistake of saying he DROPS 50% of passes, I admit to that mistake, but your the guy that brought in ALL the intangibles, not Salmar, so don't drag him into this, your the guy that brought up D leverage which forces the receivers in or out, your the guy that argued those points which had absolutely nothing to do with my OP, here you are again twisting comment to save face here.
to tell the truth I don't even keep tabs of drops, what I care about is for the receiver to arrive at the catch point on schedule with his QB
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
