Re: 2022 WR's
Posted: 22 Aug 2022 15:01
Yeah, Winfree has performed better than Cobb in camp to my understanding. Cobb is a slot possession tool who I adore and whose job is safe because Rodgers trusts him and he's clutch.
But Winfree is playing with the starters routinely. He has made fewer big plays than Doubs, but also made far fewer discernable errors than Doubs. He is more consistent and more ready to play. And Watkins only came on of late.
Lazard, Watkins, and Winfree have been the three best-performing WRs in camp. Doubs has been the splashiest. That's the 3-4 "best" WRs on the team. That means most capable to play and contribute right now. I think Doubs and Watson will both be better players long-term, but right now it's a tie with Doubs and Watson hasn't played until today.
So judging by performance in preseason and training camp, to the best of my ability to follow the news through secondary sources, Winfree has easily been among the small group of consistent performers routinely playing with the 1s.
And I don't even think this a controvertial or egregious take. Like I read the tweets most days and usually Winfree is involved in moving the ball, catches passes from both Rodgers and Love in team and red zone periods, makes nice contested catches, gets some separation, etc.
He's the idea possession receiver. He doesn't have a clear weakness in his game besides health. He is fast enough, big enough, runs good enough routes, has good enough hands, has gotten comfortable enough within the offense, and makes contested catches. Rodgers has three times mentioned him positively by name/number--once in the minicamp, and twice in training camp. One of those mentions was in relation to Winfree showing he can be trusted by winning a contested deep ball o the first play of team periods of the day (maybe even day one). One was in regards to him being one of the two guys that gives Rodgers faith in the depth behind the 3 veterans he already knows and trusts; and the minicamp mention was about him being a "damned good player" in reference to the notion that the new guys are going to have to fight for their role because we have some good ones already here.
If that's not a guy in the top 4 of our WR room ON THE FIELD RIGHT NOW (don't ignore that caveat), I'm not sure what possibly could be.
But Winfree is playing with the starters routinely. He has made fewer big plays than Doubs, but also made far fewer discernable errors than Doubs. He is more consistent and more ready to play. And Watkins only came on of late.
Lazard, Watkins, and Winfree have been the three best-performing WRs in camp. Doubs has been the splashiest. That's the 3-4 "best" WRs on the team. That means most capable to play and contribute right now. I think Doubs and Watson will both be better players long-term, but right now it's a tie with Doubs and Watson hasn't played until today.
So judging by performance in preseason and training camp, to the best of my ability to follow the news through secondary sources, Winfree has easily been among the small group of consistent performers routinely playing with the 1s.
And I don't even think this a controvertial or egregious take. Like I read the tweets most days and usually Winfree is involved in moving the ball, catches passes from both Rodgers and Love in team and red zone periods, makes nice contested catches, gets some separation, etc.
He's the idea possession receiver. He doesn't have a clear weakness in his game besides health. He is fast enough, big enough, runs good enough routes, has good enough hands, has gotten comfortable enough within the offense, and makes contested catches. Rodgers has three times mentioned him positively by name/number--once in the minicamp, and twice in training camp. One of those mentions was in relation to Winfree showing he can be trusted by winning a contested deep ball o the first play of team periods of the day (maybe even day one). One was in regards to him being one of the two guys that gives Rodgers faith in the depth behind the 3 veterans he already knows and trusts; and the minicamp mention was about him being a "damned good player" in reference to the notion that the new guys are going to have to fight for their role because we have some good ones already here.
If that's not a guy in the top 4 of our WR room ON THE FIELD RIGHT NOW (don't ignore that caveat), I'm not sure what possibly could be.