I hate the city of Philadelphia. It’s filled with sports fans that act sub-human. I can appreciate many of their players. Is it possible for me to like the Eagles to win but the fans not get anything? Lol.
I hate the city of Philadelphia. It’s filled with sports fans that act sub-human. I can appreciate many of their players. Is it possible for me to like the Eagles to win but the fans not get anything? Lol.
Yeah I don't like the people from Philly either. Except for Mac, Dee, Dennis, Frank, and Charlie.
p8771921_b_v10_ab.jpg (923.97 KiB) Viewed 556 times
Didn't notice this live, but... Kittle is ineligible.
Re: The Playoffs
Posted: 29 Jan 2023 11:11
by Pckfn23
I'm going to say Bengals and Eagles coming out. Bengals only for the fact that the Bengals seem to have had the Chiefs number. I think the Eagles can pressure the &%$@ out of Purdy and force him into mistakes. I won't put any money on the Bengals, but I would the Eagles.
Re: The Playoffs
Posted: 29 Jan 2023 12:20
by Labrev
If Mahomes was 100%, I would have said Chiefs, but I think a gimpy Mahomes holds them back too much against a good defense, and Chiefs D does not look equipped to stop the Bengals' offense.
Eagles match up more than adequately against SanFran and just flat-out have better talent.
Bengals-Eagles SuperBowl.
Re: The Playoffs
Posted: 29 Jan 2023 12:29
by Yoop
your you tube shows that Kittle was actually eligible, two receivers allowed on the los, and the receivers next to Kittle isn't, a TE can line up on the los, and go out for a pass as long as only one other receivers lines up on the LOS.
great play design, great throw and stupendous catch.
these 4 teams seem very evenly matched, I wont bother to predict a outcome, just a guess, the teams that makes the least mistakes will prevail.
KC, been good a long while, minus the luxury of drafting top 10 for like ever, so I want them to beat Cinci who needed that to be who they are.
same with Philly, but I've never liked the Eagles, so I want Purdy to play mistake free and allow the vet talent to get er done
your you tube shows that Kittle was actually eligible, two receivers allowed on the los, and the receivers next to Kittle isn't, a TE can line up on the los, and go out for a pass as long as only one other receivers lines up on the LOS.
great play design, great throw and stupendous catch.
If a player lined up on the line of scrimmage also has a player outside him lined up on the line of scrimmage that player is ineligible. That is what makes Kittle ineligible.
your you tube shows that Kittle was actually eligible, two receivers allowed on the los, and the receivers next to Kittle isn't, a TE can line up on the los, and go out for a pass as long as only one other receivers lines up on the LOS.
great play design, great throw and stupendous catch.
If a player lined up on the line of scrimmage also has a player outside him lined up on the line of scrimmage that player is ineligible. That is what makes Kittle ineligible.
he's not on the LOS.
Kittle explained this on McAffery show and you clip probably shows that Juice isn't on the LOS
He's no more covered then a slot receiver would be, thats not a OL lined up outside of him, it's the FB, as long as 0nly 2 receivers are on the los and there isn't a OL man lined up outside of them also on the los, then both those receivers on the LOS are eligible.
your you tube shows that Kittle was actually eligible, two receivers allowed on the los, and the receivers next to Kittle isn't, a TE can line up on the los, and go out for a pass as long as only one other receivers lines up on the LOS.
great play design, great throw and stupendous catch.
If a player lined up on the line of scrimmage also has a player outside him lined up on the line of scrimmage that player is ineligible. That is what makes Kittle ineligible.
he's not on the LOS.
Kittle explained this on McAffery show and you clip probably shows that Juice isn't on the LOS
If Kittle or even Juszczyk is not on the line of scrimmage then the tackles are not either and it is an illegal formation.
If a player lined up on the line of scrimmage also has a player outside him lined up on the line of scrimmage that player is ineligible. That is what makes Kittle ineligible.
he's not on the LOS.
Kittle explained this on McAffery show and you clip probably shows that Juice isn't on the LOS
If Kittle is not on the line of scrimmage then the tackles are not either and it is an illegal formation.
KITTLE IS ON THE LOS, as is Ayuik, no OL outside of them, and no other receiver on the los, basically Kittle is your slot receiver, perfectly legal, what confused Dallas is so was the FB
just think if we had the experienced skill position players Lafleuer could scheme up this type of deception, sure fooled the hell out of you
Kittle explained this on McAffery show and you clip probably shows that Juice isn't on the LOS
If Kittle is not on the line of scrimmage then the tackles are not either and it is an illegal formation.
KITTLE IS ON THE LOS, as is Ayuik, no OL outside of them, and no other receiver on the los, basically Kittle is your slot receiver, perfectly legal, what confused Dallas is so was the FB
just think if we had the experienced skill position players Lafleuer could scheme up this type of deception, sure fooled the hell out of you
Only 1 of these things can be true:
1. Juszczyk and the tackles are off the line of scrimmage
2. Juszczyk and the tackles are on the line of scrimmage
Both would lead to a penalty on the play. It is either not enough men on the line or Kittle was ineligible.
Kittle says he was not supposed to go out for a pass. Most likely because he was not supposed to be eligible.
Re: The Playoffs
Posted: 29 Jan 2023 13:28
by Yoop
your right, I thought it was only OL man that he had to be outside of, but that FB had to be also.
Re: The Playoffs
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 10:44
by Pckfn23
Re: The Playoffs
Posted: 31 Jan 2023 11:15
by go pak go
Back to the Kittle thing, I am glad this is being discussed because I don't fully understand the rule.
I count 6 players on the LOS if you include the TE and FB. I don't consider the Tackles on the LOS and we can't see the WRs. If we assume at least 1 of the WRs is on the LOS, we then have 7 which is the minimum requirement.
Are we saying because the tackles were so far off and Kittle is on the LOS that this is what makes Kittle ineligible?
Because I see tackles off the line quite a bit in pass sets so I want to understand this more.
Back to the Kittle thing, I am glad this is being discussed because I don't fully understand the rule.
I count 6 players on the LOS if you include the TE and FB. I don't consider the Tackles on the LOS and we can't see the WRs. If we assume at least 1 of the WRs is on the LOS, we then have 7 which is the minimum requirement.
Are we saying because the tackles were so far off and Kittle is on the LOS that this is what makes Kittle ineligible?
Because I see tackles off the line quite a bit in pass sets so I want to understand this more.
If the tackles are not on the LOS then neither is Juszczyk, so it would be only Kittle, 2 Gs, 1 C, and the WR on the line, so 5. Illegal Formation.
If both tackles are on the LOS then Juszczyk is, so Kittle, also being on the line, can not go out for a pass. Ineligible receiver down field. This is due to an eligible number being covered up by another player(Juszczyk) on the LOS outside of him.
General rule of thumb when looking at on or off the LOS for inline players is that they must break the plain of the Cs butt.
