Page 2 of 2

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 02 Oct 2022 12:09
by Trudge
Josh Allen threw an interception the first drive. Baltimore has it first and goal at the 4 yard with they scored a touchdown.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 02 Oct 2022 19:00
by mnpackerbacker
Just saw Vike's Lewis Cine's ankle injury on twitter. Not going to post it. pretty gruesome.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 03 Oct 2022 19:50
by Raptorman
mnpackerbacker wrote:
02 Oct 2022 19:00
Just saw Vike's Lewis Cine's ankle injury on twitter. Not going to post it. pretty gruesome.
Is it ankle or leg? Two sources are saying different things. The coach said leg. The press said ankle. Yeah, it looked bad.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 03 Oct 2022 21:56
by YoHoChecko
so, ummm, is Matt Stafford randomly terrible now?

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 06:19
by BF004
YoHoChecko wrote:
03 Oct 2022 21:56
so, ummm, is Matt Stafford randomly terrible now?
Now?

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 08:34
by YoHoChecko
BF004 wrote:
04 Oct 2022 06:19
YoHoChecko wrote:
03 Oct 2022 21:56
so, ummm, is Matt Stafford randomly terrible now?
Now?
He used to be good statistically, but throw some random bonehead balls... like Kirk Cousins.

But having him on a fantasy team has alerted me to the fact that he is actually not good at anything this season.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 08:38
by Pckfn23
YoHoChecko wrote:
04 Oct 2022 08:34
BF004 wrote:
04 Oct 2022 06:19
YoHoChecko wrote:
03 Oct 2022 21:56
so, ummm, is Matt Stafford randomly terrible now?
Now?
He used to be good statistically, but throw some random bonehead balls... like Kirk Cousins.

But having him on a fantasy team has alerted me to the fact that he is actually not good at anything this season.
He did lead the NFL in INTs last year. I have had him on and off over the years and he really is just a marginal QB who caught lightning in a bottle last year.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 09:49
by NCF
Pckfn23 wrote:
04 Oct 2022 08:38
He did lead the NFL in INTs last year. I have had him on and off over the years and he really is just a marginal QB who caught lightning in a bottle last year.
Hidden by the fact that he probably could have caught lightning in a bottle at other various points during his career, but was burdened by complete garbage teams around him. He wasn't the problem in Detroit, obviously, but at times he wasn't necessarily part of the solution, either.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 09:54
by Pckfn23
NCF wrote:
04 Oct 2022 09:49
Pckfn23 wrote:
04 Oct 2022 08:38
He did lead the NFL in INTs last year. I have had him on and off over the years and he really is just a marginal QB who caught lightning in a bottle last year.
Hidden by the fact that he probably could have caught lightning in a bottle at other various points during his career, but was burdened by complete garbage teams around him. He wasn't the problem in Detroit, obviously, but at times he wasn't necessarily part of the solution, either.
100%

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 09:58
by go pak go
I think Stafford is a highly rated QB and should be. He is probably in that top 5 to top 7 realm the past decade.

However I don't look at him as a premium QB worthy of a SB and I don't and didn't view the Rams as that either. The Packers were the big brother to the Rams just as the 49ers were the big brother to us.

And we proved it twice. The Rams had nothing for us as we completely dominated both games.

It's just the randomness of the NFL playoffs suck. It does kind of crappy to see the Giants and Rams having a combined 3 SBs when the Packers were the superior team in all those seasons.

Re: Week 4 Games

Posted: 04 Oct 2022 10:30
by Yoop
go pak go wrote:
04 Oct 2022 09:58
I think Stafford is a highly rated QB and should be. He is probably in that top 5 to top 7 realm the past decade.

However I don't look at him as a premium QB worthy of a SB and I don't and didn't view the Rams as that either. The Packers were the big brother to the Rams just as the 49ers were the big brother to us.

And we proved it twice. The Rams had nothing for us as we completely dominated both games.

It's just the randomness of the NFL playoffs suck. It does kind of crappy to see the Giants and Rams having a combined 3 SBs when the Packers were the superior team in all those seasons.
to many variables, it's all about how players match up in the play schemes designed per game, the Giants beat us because we showed up for that game far to dependent on a spread vertical pass scheme that required for the QB to hold the ball to long against one of the best pass rushing defenses in the league, if thats not a recipe for disaster I'd like to know what is, we couldn't run against them either and the defense wasn't anywhere near as good as it had been just a year prior, and ST's, we lets not even get into that lol.

just as with this Giants game Sunday, when we scheme to stop the run we can be as good at that as most other teams, but it takes that type of game plan.

Barry as most DC's know, just how much more important it is to stop the pass, it is rare for a team to consistently move the chains running the ball, we get all googly eyed when we do it, when our blocking is getting it done our RB's are two of the best in the league, not many teams can brag like we can about our Rb's