The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Wouldn't surprise me at all if he is a starting safety by week 5.
I think Nixon will be our #1 kick returner, so I don't expect to see him as a starting defender, what makes a returner great is fresh legs, wear them down and the drop off can be dramatic
Toure actually had a nice day yesterday, got very open a few times and had a really nice reception on the last play. I think he will still see the field a lot, even if Reed is ahead of him, as seems to be the case.APB wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 16:18Two days in and I think I've seen Toure's name in a two tweets. Reed, otoh, has been mentioned a ton.
Looks the the Rank the Roster crowd who argued Reed over Toure may have nailed it.
Speaking of which, has the WR pecking order been mentioned? Are they all swapping out randomly?
I loved what Tae Adams was able to do, but our receiver situation is vastly better, having 2 receivers that are legitimate #2' guys to couple with a dominate #1 which most of us think Watson can be is so much better then Adams and a bunch of #3 or 4's for depth.APB wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 16:18Two days in and I think I've seen Toure's name in a two tweets. Reed, otoh, has been mentioned a ton.
Looks the the Rank the Roster crowd who argued Reed over Toure may have nailed it.
Speaking of which, has the WR pecking order been mentioned? Are they all swapping out randomly?
Who would have thought the 2nd round pick is better than the 7th. Weird game.APB wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 16:18Two days in and I think I've seen Toure's name in a two tweets. Reed, otoh, has been mentioned a ton.
Looks the the Rank the Roster crowd who argued Reed over Toure may have nailed it.
Speaking of which, has the WR pecking order been mentioned? Are they all swapping out randomly?
lupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 17:46Who would have thought the 2nd round pick is better than the 7th. Weird game.APB wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 16:18Two days in and I think I've seen Toure's name in a two tweets. Reed, otoh, has been mentioned a ton.
Looks the the Rank the Roster crowd who argued Reed over Toure may have nailed it.
Speaking of which, has the WR pecking order been mentioned? Are they all swapping out randomly?
Oddly enough I called that one. Flynn was a winner and Brohm had not a single special attribute.BF004 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 18:06image.pnglupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 17:46Who would have thought the 2nd round pick is better than the 7th. Weird game.APB wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 16:18Two days in and I think I've seen Toure's name in a two tweets. Reed, otoh, has been mentioned a ton.
Looks the the Rank the Roster crowd who argued Reed over Toure may have nailed it.
Speaking of which, has the WR pecking order been mentioned? Are they all swapping out randomly?
Is it frustrating to make a valid point and have anomaly’s mentioned as if they should invalidate your solid take?lupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 19:39Oddly enough I called that one. Flynn was a winner and Brohm had not a single special attribute.BF004 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 18:06image.pnglupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 17:46
Who would have thought the 2nd round pick is better than the 7th. Weird game.
Myers improving over his performance last year would go a long way in improving the depth on the interior offensive line. Don't forget that Tom can line up there if needed as well.
I don't think the Packers have any plans of moving Nixon to safety.
Watson needs to prove he's truly a legit #1 receiver. The same is true for Doubs and Reed as #2s as well. Therefore I don't consider the receiving corps to be any better than it was while Adams was still around at this point.Yoop wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 17:03I loved what Tae Adams was able to do, but our receiver situation is vastly better, having 2 receivers that are legitimate #2' guys to couple with a dominate #1 which most of us think Watson can be is so much better then Adams and a bunch of #3 or 4's for depth.
Watson, Reed, Doubs, Toure, Wicks, even as young as they are we'll probably have the premier receiver group in the North and possible even the NFC
If the discussion in the Rank the Roster thread consisted solely of draft position, it'd be a solid take. It didn't.Drj820 wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 22:27Is it frustrating to make a valid point and have anomaly’s mentioned as if they should invalidate your solid take?lupedafiasco wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 19:39Oddly enough I called that one. Flynn was a winner and Brohm had not a single special attribute.
Watson proved that to me last year, heck so did Doubs.CWIMM wrote: ↑28 Jul 2023 03:08Myers improving over his performance last year would go a long way in improving the depth on the interior offensive line. Don't forget that Tom can line up there if needed as well.
I don't think the Packers have any plans of moving Nixon to safety.
Watson needs to prove he's truly a legit #1 receiver. The same is true for Doubs and Reed as #2s as well. Therefore I don't consider the receiving corps to be any better than it was while Adams was still around at this point.Yoop wrote: ↑27 Jul 2023 17:03I loved what Tae Adams was able to do, but our receiver situation is vastly better, having 2 receivers that are legitimate #2' guys to couple with a dominate #1 which most of us think Watson can be is so much better then Adams and a bunch of #3 or 4's for depth.
Watson, Reed, Doubs, Toure, Wicks, even as young as they are we'll probably have the premier receiver group in the North and possible even the NFC