Packers Huddle

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 13:47

Yikes, 173 lbs for Wiggins?

Mitchell Thursday. Cya Friday. The others don't hit gbs target measurements and frankly 170 doesn't get it

Can I pick 'em or what...?




Seriously, though. What the hell happened? Did he not train at all? Was this his expected performance?

All they have there for Ennis is height/weight, broad jump, and 40 yard dash (with 10/20-yard split).

A pretty incomplete picture: no agility drills at all, no vert.

He scores in the red because his weight is very low at 183 lbs., and everything else is just average.

Underwhelming numbers, but nothing that would cause me to take him off the 'board, just move him down.

APB wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 15:23

Can I pick 'em or what...?




Seriously, though. What the hell happened? Did he not train at all? Was this his expected performance?

Idk. He said a few weeks ago he had an injury but damn sit out. He's also smaller then advertised.

It's Mitchell or bust day 1

183, 5' 11", 4.5 40... Pass in first 3 rounds.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 17:03

183, 5' 11", 4.5 40... Pass

There you go, using those rulers again. Are you gonna have enough?

;-)

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 17:04

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 17:03

183, 5' 11", 4.5 40... Pass

There you go, using those rulers again. Are you gonna have enough?

;-)

Unless he really is hurt, there is just no way a guy that small should run that slow as a DB.

Wait...this is one of the top safety prospects? And here I thought Rakestraw under-performed...

If you run a 4.5 plus as a CB, you better dominate at the individual drills, only outstanding technical ability can over come that slow timing, Rakestraw hurt his pocket book yesterday.

same with KInchens, if there is even a smidge of doubt your going to show this poorly, don't even do the combine drills, do the interviews, the medicals and wait for your pro day workouts.

that RB Benson from FS is a big kid and just burned a 4.39 40 waiting to see how he does in the drills, looks like a stud.

Corum ran a 4.53, Estime looked slow at 4.72

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024 13:07

I'm a little freaked out by how old he is, but man did his combine go well! He's another fast guy with low usage in college, but seems to have the bulk to hold up to better usage. He's broken really long TD runs in each of the last three years, but with all that potential and burst, it make me wonder why he wasn't used more.

Totally forgot Guerendo was a badger. Crazy athlete.

Love wright. He's built to play RB. Compact and his game tape he doesn't go down easy

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 17:05

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 17:04

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

01 Mar 2024 17:03

183, 5' 11", 4.5 40... Pass

There you go, using those rulers again. Are you gonna have enough?

;-)

Unless he really is hurt, there is just no way a guy that small should run that slow as a DB.

Details like this are important to note:

APB wrote: ↑

02 Mar 2024 16:14

Details like this are important to note:

Gauntlet one of my secret indicators for NFL success. I have a laughably good history for predicting good and bad WR’s, ncf would vouch, but not trying to toot my horn here.

But guys who ran away from the ball nearly all suck eventually. Guys who will body catch these at all, will suck. Guys who go slow will suck. Coleman did well, passed 1 test. But you can still even find guys who run with their hair on fire and go get the ball or look even smoother.


Should look like this: