Re: Rank the Roster 2020: #12
Posted: 14 May 2020 10:59
his name fits him well.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑14 May 2020 08:19Most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. If you think there's a 70% chance a player busts, you don't sign him. You don't give hon guaranteed money at all.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑14 May 2020 01:24I voted for Linsley and it is a no brainer to me.
But now we have a bunch of unproven or partially proven players. Some with a lot of upside. For me the next group is Sternberger, Savage and Lazard.
As for Kirksey, if you look at the way his contract is structured, it appears to me that the Packers view him as a boom or bust in the ratio of about 30-70. That means a 30% chance of being a good player and a 70% chance of being a total bust probably because he will rip his hamstring again and never play again.
Just insane, uninformed pessimism for the beck of it.
KIrksey, It's impossible to say once injured, always injured, and when healthy I think the next best player.
depend who you read but last week I read somewhere that Jenkins only had 11 pressures against him, now McGinn says Linsley lead with 14.5 so who can ya believe, always felt Linsley was a weak point with our run blocking, still he's next and then Savage.